Biotechnology of roses: progress and future prospects

Güller (Rosa spp.) dünyadaki en önemli çiçek ürünlerinden biri olup gerek süs bitkileri sektöründe gerekse parfümeri ve kozmetik sanayinde önemli bir yere sahiptir. Güllerin ıslahı ve ticari üretiminde çok sayıda potansiyel ve pratik uygulamalardan dolayı güllerin biyoteknolojisinde önemli gelişmeler görülmüştür. Doku kültürü yöntemi ile hastalıklardan ari ve hızlı bitki üretimi, ticari gül çeşitlerinin çoğaltılmasında önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Gen transferi, kısırlık, poliplodi, yüksek heterozigot düzeyi ve uzun ıslah süreci gibi klasik ıslah yöntemleri ile ilgili zorlukları ortadan kaldırdığından dolayı gül ıslahında alternatif bir yöntem olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Biyoteknoloji aynı zamanda kimeral dokuların ayrıştırılmasına ve kısırlıktan kaynaklanan zorlukların ıslaha verdiği sıkıntıları embriyo kurtarma ve in vitro’da çimlendirme olanaklarıyla ortadan kaldırılmasına katkıda bulunmuştur. In vitro’da tohum çimlendirme ile diğer yöntemlerle çimlendirilemeyen tohumların çimlendirilebilmesine olanak sağlanmış ve böylece ıslah süresinin kısaltılmasına önemli katkı sağlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, gülün regenerasyonu, in vitro üretimi, gül kimeralarının doku kültürleri yöntemiyle ayrıştırılması, kallus ve protoplast kültürleri, embriyo kurtarma ve in vitro çimlendirme çalışmaları, gen transferi alanındaki gelişmeler ve bu gelişmelerin gül ıslahına etkileri üzerinde bilgiler sunulmuştur.

Gülün Biyoteknolojisi: gelişmeler ve eğilimler

Roses (Rosa spp.) are one of the most important flower crops in the world and have an economic value in ornamental, pharmaceutical and cosmetic trade. Significant progress has been made in biotechnology of roses due to its many potential and practical applications in commercial production and in breeding of roses. Rapid multiplication and production of disease-free plants in vitro have played a vital role in propagation of commercial rose cultivars. Genetic transformation is emerged as an alternative promising tool in rose breeding since it eliminates the difficulties associated with sexual hybridization such as lengthy breeding cycles, sterility, polyploidy and high level of heterozygosity. Biotechnology also allows chimeral segregation and can overcome some of the sterility problems through embryo rescue. In vitro seed germination protocols are ways to shorten breeding cycles and could be used to germinate the seeds that are not possible to germinate by other means. In this present review, the progress in regeneration, in vitro propagation, chimeral segregation, callus and protoplast culture, embryo rescue, in vitro germination, and genetic transformation of roses were discussed and the impact of biotechnology on rose breeding was evaluated.

___

Amorim, H.V., Dougall, D.K., Sharp, W.R., 1977. The effect of carbohydrate and nitrogen concentration on phenol synthesis in ‘Paul's Scarlet' rose cells grown in tissue culture. Physiol. Plant., 39:91-95.

Antonelli, M., Druart, P.H., 1990. The use of a brief 2,4-D treatment to induce leaf regeneration on Prunus canescens. Bois Acta Hortic., 280:45– 50.

Arena, L., Pellegrino, C., Gudin, S., 1993. A comparison of the somaclonal variation level of Rosa hybrida L. cv Meirutral plants regenerated from callus or direct induction from different vegetative and embryonic tissues. Euphytica, 71:83-90.

Arnold, N.P., Michael, R.B., Daniel C.C., Nayana, N.B., Raymond, P. 1995. Auxins, salt concentrations, and their interactions during in vitro rooting of winter hardy and Hybrid tea roses. Hortscience, 30(7):1436-1440.

Arunachalam, V., Kaicker, U.S., 1994. In vitro germination A potential commercial method for roses: 410-412. In Prakash, J. and Bhandry, K.R. (eds). Floriculture, technology, trades and trends Oxford and IBH publishing CO. PVT. LTD. New Delhi.

Asano, G., Tanimoto, S., 2003. Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation and Transgenic Plant Regeneration from Embryogenic Calli Derived from an Immature Seed Produced from Miniature Rose Cultivar 'Shortcake' Plant Biotechnol, 20(4):291-296.

Avramis, T., J. Hugrd, and R. Jonard. 1982. La multiplication in vitro du Rosier porte-greffe. Rosa indica major. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris III. 294: 63-68.

Banthorpe, D.V., Barrow, S.E., 1983. Monoterpene biosynthesis in extracts from cultures of Rosa damascena. Phytochem, 22:2727-2728.

Barve, D.M., Iyer, R.S., Kendurkar, S., Mascarenhas, A.F., 1984. An effective method for rapid propagation of some budded rose varieties. Indian J. Hort., 41:1-7.

Bharadwaj, R., Singh, S.K., Pal, S., Kumar, S., 2006. An improved protocol for micro-propagation of miniature rose (Rosa chinensis Jacq. var. minima) cultivars. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 9(4):238-242.

Bressan, R.H., Kim, Y.J., Hyndman, S.E., Hasegawa, P.M., Bressan, R.A., 1982. Factors affecting in vitro propagation of rose. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 107:979-990.

Burger, D.W., Liu, L., Zary, K.W., Lee, C.I., 1990. Organogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of R. hybrida L. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 21:147-152.

Canlı, F.A., 1997. Separation of Rose Chimeras Into Their (Rosa sp.) Consistent Genotypes in vitro Master Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaigng, USA.

Canlı, F.A., 2003-a. Effects of dark and TDZ on callus formation of rose leaf explants. P. J. of Biol. Sci. 6(19):1672-1674.

Canlı, F.A., 2003-b. A Review on Thornless Roses. P. J. of Biol. Sciences 6(19):1612-1619.

Canlı, F.A., Skirvin, R.M., 2003. Separation of thornless rose chimeras into their (Rosa sp.) consistent genotypes in vitro. P. J. Biol. Sci. 19: 1644-1648

Carelli, B.P., Echeverrigaray, S., 2002. An improved system for the in vitro propagation of rose cultivars. Sci Hortic., 92:69 –74.

Chavan, D.K., Shah, M.K., Mathur, R.C., 2007. In vitro propagation of hybrid tea rose varieties for commercial cultivation. Phytomorphology, 57(1/2):85-90.

Compas, P.S., Pais, M.S.S., 1990. Mass propagation of the dwarf rose cultivar ‘Rosamini’ . Sci. Hort. 43: 321-330.

Condliffe, P.C., Davey, M.R., Brian, PJ., Koehorst-van Putten, H., Visser, P.B., 2003. An Optimised Protocol For Rose Transformation Applicable To Different Cultivars. Acta Hort., 612:115-120.

Cousineau, J.C., Donelly, D.J., 1991. Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants of tissue cultured and green house grown raspberry. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 27:249–55.

Davies, D.R., 1980. Rapid propagation of roses In vitro. Sci. Hortic., 13:385-389.

de Wit, J.C., Esandam, H.F., Honkanen, J.J., Tuominen, U., 1990. Somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of flowering plants in rose. Plant Cell Rep., 9:456-458.

Dohm, A., Ludwig, C., Nehring, K., Debener, T., 2001. Somatic embryogenesis in roses. Acta Hort, 547:341– 7.

Dohm, A., Ludwig, C., Schilling, D., Debener, T., 2002. Transformation of roses with genes for antifungal proteins to reduce their susceptibility to fungal diseases. Acta Hort., 572:105-111.

Douglas, G.C., Rutledge, C.B., Casey, A.D., Richardson, D.H.S., 1989. Micropropagation of floribunda, ground cover and miniature roses. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 19: 55-64.

Druitt, L., Shoup, M., 1991. Thornless Roses. Horticulture, 69.78-82.

Dubois, L.A.M., de Vries, D.P., 1995. Prolongation of vase life of cut roses via introduction of genes coding for antibacterial activity, somatic embryogenesis and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, Acta Hort., 405:205–209.

Dubois, L.A.M., Roggermans, J., Soyeurt, G., Vries, D.P., 1988. Comparison of the growth and development of dwarf rose cultivars propagated in vitro and in vivo by softwood cuttings. SciHort., 35:293-299.

Elliot, R. F., 1970. Axenic culture of meristem tips of Rosa multiflora. Planta, 95:183-186.

Escalettes, V., Dosba, F., In vitro adventitious shoot regeneration from leaves of Prunus spp. Plant Sci., 90:201– 9.

Estabrooks, T., Browne, R., Dong, Z.M., 2007. 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid promotes somatic embryogenesis in the rose cultivar ‘Livin’ Easy’ (Rosa sp.). Plant Cell Rep., 26:153–160

Firoozabady, E., Moy, Y., Courtney-Gutterson, N., Robinson, K. 1994. Regeneration of transgenic rose (Rosa hybrida) plants from embryogenic tissue, Bio/Tech., 12:609–613.

Fletcher, J.S., 1974. Metabolism of glutamate in suspension cultures of ‘Paul's Scarlet' rose cells. Plant Physiology, 54:503-5.

Ganga, M., Irulappan, I., Chezhiyan, N., 1998. Standardisation of chemical environment for multiple shoot induction from axillary buds of the rose (Rosa centifolia Linn). South Indian Hort., 46:161–3.

Hasegawa, P. M., 1979. In vitro propagation of rose. HortScience, 14:610-612.

Hasegawa, P.M., 1980. Factors affecting shoot and root initiation from cultured rose shoot tips. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 105:216-220.

Hill, G. P., 1967. Morphogenesis of shoot primordia in cultured stem tissue of garden rose. Nature 216:596-597.

Horn, W.A.H., 1992. Micropropagation of rose (Rosa L). In: Bajaj YPS, editor. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry Vol 20 High-tech and micropropagation IV. Germany7 Springer, p. 320– 42.

Hsia, C., 1995. Regeneration and genetic transformation of rose and evergreen azalea. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Hsia, C., Korban, S., 1996. Organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in callus cultures of Rosa hybrida and Rosa chinensis minima. Plant cell Tiss. and Org. Culture, 44:1-6.

Ibrahim, A.I., 1994. Effect of gelling agent and activated charcoal on the growth and development of cordyline terminalis cultured in vitro. Proceedings of the first conference of ornamental horticulture, p. 55–67.

Ibrahim, R., Debergh, P.C., 1999. Improvement of adventitious bud formation and plantlet regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of Rosa hybrida L. Biotechn Breed., 4:413.

Jabbarzadeh, Z., Khosh-Khui, M., 2005. Factors effecting tissue culture of Damask rose (Rosa Damascena Mill.). SciHort. 105:475-482.

Jacob, G., Allan, P., Bornman, C.N., 1970. Tissue culture studies on rose: use shoot tip explants: II Cytokinin: gibberellin effects. Agroplantae, 2:25– 8.

Jacobs, G., Bornman, C.H., Allan, P., 1968. Tissue culture studies on rose: use of pith explants. S. Afr. Agric. Sci. 11:673-78.

Joseleau, T.P., Chambat, G., 1984. Structure of the primary cell walls of suspension cultured Rosa glauca cells. I. Polysaccharides associated with cellulose. Plant Physiology, 74:687-693.

Kamo, K., Jones, B., Castillon, J., Bolar, J., Smith, F., 2004. Dispersal and size fractionation of embryogenic callus increases the frequency of embryo maturation and conversion in hybrid tea roses. Plant Cell Rep., 22:787–792.

Khosh-Khui, M., Sink, K.C., 1982-a. Micropropagation of new and old world rose species. J. Hort. Sci., 57:315-319.

Khosh-Khui, M., Sink, K.C., 1982-b. Callus induction and culture or Rosa. Scientia Hort., 17:361-370.

Khosh-Khui, M., Sink, K.C., 1982-c. Rooting enhancement of Rosa hybrida for tissue culture propagation. Sci. Hort., 17: 371-376.

Khosh-Khui, M.; Jabbarzadeh, Z., 2007. Effects of several variables on in vitro culture of damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). Acta Horticulturae, 751:389-393.

Kim, C.K., Chung, J.D., Jee, S.K., Oh, J.Y., 2003-c. Somatic embryogenesis from in vitro grown leaf explants of Rosa hybrida L. J Plant Biotechnol., 5:161–4.

Kim, C.K., Chung, J.D., Park, S.H., Burrell, A.M., Kamo, K.K., Byrne, D.H., 2004-b. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation of Rosa hybrida using the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) Gene. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 78(2):107-111(5).

Kim, C.K., Oh, J.Y., Chung, J.D., Burrell, A.M., Byrne, D.H., 2004-a. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from in-vitro-grown leaf explants of rose. HortScience, 39(6):1378–1380

Kim, S.W., Oh, S.C., In, D.S., Liu, J.R., 2003-a. Plant regeneration of rose (Rosa hybrida) from embryogenic cell-derived protoplasts. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult., 73(1):15–19

Kim, S.W., Oh, S.C., Liu, J.R., 2003-b. Control of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis by exogenous growth regulators in immature zygotic embryo cultures of rose. Plant Cell Tissue

Kintzios, S., Drossopoulos, J.B., Lymperopoulos, C., 2000. Effect of vitamins and inorganic micronutrients on callus growth and somatic embryogenesis from young mature leaves of rose. J Plant Nutr., 23(10):1407–20.

Kozai, T., Kubota, C., Zobayed, S.M.A., Nguyen, T.Q., Afreen-Zobayed, F., Heo, J., 2000. Developing a mass propagation system of woody plants. In: Watanabe K, Komamine A, editors. Challenge of plant and agriculture sciences to the crisis of biosphere on the earth in the 21st century. Georgetown7 Landes Biosphere; p. 293– 306.

Krishnamurthy, K.V., Hendre, R.R., Godbole, D.A., Kulkarni, V.M., Mascarnhas, A.F., Jaganathan, V., 1979. Isolation and regeneration of rose bud callus protoplast (Rosa sp. cv. Soraya). Plant Sci. Lett., 15:135-37.

Kumar, A., Sood, A., Palni, U.T., Gupta, A.K., Palni, L.M.S., 2001. Micropropagation of Rosa damascena Mill from mature bushes using thidiazuron. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 76(1):30 – 4.

Kunitake, H., Imamizo, H., Mii, M., 1993. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature seed-derived calli of rose (Rosa rugosa Thunb). Plant Sci. 90:187-194.

Lammerts, W.E., 1946. Use of embryo culture in rose breeding. Plants and Gardens, 2:111.

Leyhe, U., Horn, W. A., 1994. Contribution to micropropagation of Rosa hybrida. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 59(2):85– 8.

Li, X., Krasnyanski, S., Korban, S.S., 2002-a. Somatic embryogenesis, secondarysomatic embryogenesis, and shoot organogenesis in Rosa, J. Plant Physiol., 159:313-319.

Li, X., Sergei F., Schuyler, K., Korban, S., 2002-b. Optimization of the uidA gene transfer into somatic embryos of rose via Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 40:453–459.

Lloyd, D., Roberts, A.V., Short, K.C., 1988. The induction in vitro adventitious shoots in Rosa. Euphytica, 37:31-36.

Marchant, R., Davey, M.R., Lucas, J.A., Lamb, C.J., Dixon, R.A., Power, J.B., 1998a. Expression of a chitinase transgene in rose (Rosa hybrida L) reduces development of black spot disease (Diplocarpon rosae Wolf), Mol. Breed., 4:187–194.

Marchant, R., Davey, M.R., Lucas, J.A., Power, J.B., 1996. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Floribunda rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cvs. Trumpeter and Glad Tidings. Plant Science, 120:95-105.

Marchant, R., Power, J.B., Lucas, J.A., Davey, M.R., 1998b. Biolistic transformation of rose (Rosa hybrida L.), Ann. Bot., 81:109–114.

Martin, C., Carre, M., Vernoy, R., 1981. La multiplication vegetative in vitro des vegetaux ligneux cultive`s: Cas des Rosier. Comp. Rend Acad. Sci. Paris III 293:175-77.

Matthews, D., Mottley, J., Horan, I., Roberts, A.V., 1991. A protoplast to plant system in roses. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 24:173-80.

McPheeters, K.D., Skirvin, R.M., 1983. Histogenic layer manipulation in chimeral 'Thornless Evergreen' trailing blackberry. Euphytica, 32:351-360.

McPheeters, K.D., Skirvin, R.M., 1989. Somaclonal variation among ex vitro 'Thornless Evergreen' trailing blackberries. Euphytica, 42:155-162.

Mederos, S., Enriquez-Rodriguez, M.J., 1987. In vitro propagation of ‘Golden Times’roses, factors affecting shoot tips and axillary buds growth and morphologenesis. Acta Hort., 212:619-624.

Mollard, A., Robert, D., 1984. Etude de la lignine parietale et exracellularie des suspensions cellulaires de Rosa galuca. Physiol. Veg., 22:3-17.

Morey, D., 1969. Selection criteria for breeding: 278-290. In: Roses. Mastalerz, J.W. and Langhans, R.W. (eds). Pennsylvania flower growers. New York State flower grower association Inc.

Muhitch, M.J., Fletcher, J.S., 1985. Influence of culture age and spermidine treatment on accumulation of phenolic compounds in suspension cultures. Plant Physiol., 78:25-28.

Murali, S., Sreedhar, D., Lokeswari, T.S., 1996. Regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from petal-derived calli of Rosa hybrida L. cv. Arizona (hybrid tea). Euphytica, 91:271–275.

Murashige, T., Skoog, F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physio. Planta., 15:473-97.

Murphy, T.M., 1984. Effect of sulhydryl reagents on K+ efflux from rose cels. Plant Physiol., 75:138-141.

Murphy, T.M., Matson, G.B., Morrison, S.L., 1983. Ultraviolet-stimulated KHCO3 efflux from rose cells. Plant Physiol., 73:20-24.

Nesius, K.K., Fletcher, T.S., 1973. Carbon dioxide and pH hydrogen ion concentration requirements of non-photosynthetic cultures cells. Physiol. Plant., 28:259-63.

Nesius, K.K., Uchytil, L.E., Fletcher, T.S., 1972. Minimal organic medium for suspension cultures of ‘Paul’s Scarlet’ rose. Planta, 106:173-176.

Nobbs, K.J., 1984. Breeding thornless roses. American Rose Annual 1984. The American Rose Society, Shreveport, LA. pp 37-43.

Noriega, C., Sondahl, M.R., 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in hybrid tea roses. Bio-Technology, 9:991-93.

Oliver, W.G., 1986. A précis of thornless development. The rose. The Royal National Rose Society. 80. (3). Org Cult., 74(1):61–66

OngChia, M., AungShuh, W., Sinniah, U., Xavier, R., Subramaniam, S., 2007. Cysteine and acetosyringone are the two important parameters in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rose hybrid (Rosa hybrida L.) cv. Nikita. Journal of Plant Sciences 2(4):387-397.

Pati, P.K., 2002. Tissue, cell and protoplast culture studies in Rosa damascena Mill. and Rosa bourboniana Desp. PhD thesis. Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, India.

Pati, P.K., Sharma, M., Ahuja, P.S., 2001. Micropropagation, protoplast culture and its implications in the improvement of scented rose. Acta Hortic., 547:147–58.

Pati, P.K., Sharma, M., Sood, A., Ahuja, P.S., 2004. Direct shoot regeneration from leaf explants of R. damascena Mill. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant, 40(2):192– 5.

Pearce, R.S., Cocking, E.C., 1973. Behavior in culture of isolated protoplast from Paul's Scarlet' rose suspension culture cells. Protoplasma, 77:165-180.

Pittet, H., Moncousin, C., 1982. Rose in vitro micropropagation. Rev Hortic Suisse, 55(3):67– 9.

Rosu, A., Skirvin, R.M., Bein, A., Norton, M.A., Kushad, M., 1995. The development of putative adventitious shoots from a chimeral thornless rose (Rosa multiflora Thunb. ex J. Murr.) in vitro. J. Hort. Sci.,70:901-907.

Rout, G.R., Debata, B.K., Das, P., 1990. In vitro clonal multiplication of roses. Proc Natl Acad Sci India, 60:311 – 8.

Rout, G.R., Debata, B.K., Das, P., 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in callus culture of Rosa hybrida L. cv. Landora. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 27:65-9.

Rout, G.R., Samantaray, S., Mottey, J., Das, P., 1999. Biotechnology of the rose: a review of recent progress, Sci. Hort., 81:201–228.

Sarasan, V., Roberts, A.V., Rout, G.R., 2001. Methyl laurate and 6-benzyladenine promote the germination of somatic embryos of a hybrid rose. Plant Cell Rep 20:183–186.

Sato, S.S., Mori, H., 2001. Control of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Plant Physiol., 127:405–1413.

Schenk, R.U., Hildebrandt, A.C., 1972. Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Canadian Journal of Botany, 50: 199-204.

Schum, A., Hofmann, K., Ghalib, N., Tawfik, A., 2001. Factors affecting protoplast isolation and plant regeneration in Rosa spp. Gartenbauwiss, 66:115–122

Semeniuk, P., 1969. Specialized techniques for breeding: 267-277. In: Roses. Mastalerz, J.W. and Langhans, R.W. (eds). Pennsylvania flower growers. New York State Flower Grower Association Inc.

Singh, A.K., Dubey, A.K., 2003. In vitro regeneration of miniature rose (Rosa chinensis) cultivar Rosamini. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture (New Series), 6(3):234-238.

Singh, S.K., Syamal, M.M., 1999. Critical studies on the effect of growth regulators on in vivo shoot proliferation in Rosa hybrida L cv Sonia for micropropagation. J Appl Hortic Lucknow 1:91– 3.

Skirvin, R.M. ,1978. Natural and induced variation in tissue culture. Euphytica, 27:241-66.

Skirvin, R.M., Chu, M.C., 1979. In vitro culture of 'Forever Yours' rose. HortScience, 14:608-610.

Skirvin, R.M., Chu, M.C., 1984. The effect of light quality on root development on in vitro grown miniature roses. Hortic Sci., 19:575.

Skirvin, R.M., Chu, M.C., Young, H.J., 1990. Rose: 716-743. In: Ammirato, P.V., D.A. Evans, W.R. Sharp and Y.P.S. Bajaj (eds). Handbook of plant cell culture. Volume 5. Ornamental Species. McGraw Hill Publishing Co., New York.

Skirvin, R.M., McPheeters, K.D., Norton, M., 1994. Source and frequency of somaclonal variation. HortScience, 29(11):1232-1236.

Souq, F., Coutos-Thevenot, P., Yean, H., Delbard, G., Maziere, Y., Barbe, J.P., Boulay, M., 1996. Genetic transformation of roses, 2 examples: one on morphogenesis, the other on anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway. Acta Hort., 424:381-388.

Stratuss, A., Potrykus, I., 1980. Callus formation from protoplast of cell suspension cultures of rose ‘Paul's Scarlet'. Physiol. Plantha, 48:15-20.

Tian, C., Ying, Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Zhao, L., 2008. Plant regeneration through protocorm-like bodies induced from rhizoids using leaf explants of Rosa spp. Plant Cell Rep DOI 10.1007/s00299-007-0504-7 (in press).

Tweddle, D., Roberts, A.V., Short, K.C., 1984. In vitro culture of roses: 529-530. In Novak, F.J., L. Havel, and J. Dolezel (eds) Plant Tissue and Cell Culture Application to Crop Improvement. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.

XuJuan, L., Zhen, F., LanYong, Z., LiGuo, F., ShouChao, Y., 2007. The effect of polyphenol content and polyphenol oxidase activity on in vitro rooting of Pingyin rose cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 34(3): 695-698.

van der Salm, T.P.M., Bouwer, R., van Dijk, A.J., Keizer, L.C.P., Hanish Ten Cate, C.H., van der Plas, L.H.W., Dons, J.J.M., 1998. Stimulation of scion bud release by rol gene transformed rootstocks of Rosa hybrida L, J. Exp. Bot., 49:847–852.

van der Salm, T.P.M., van der Toorn, C.J.G., Bouwer, R., Don, H.J.M., 1997. Production of Rol gene transformed plants of Rosa hybrida L. and characterization of their rooting ability, Mol. Breed., 3:39–47.

van der Salm, T.P.M., van der Toorn, C.J.G., Hanisch Ten Cate, C.H., Dubois, L.A.M., de Vries, D.P., Dons, H.J.M., 1996. Somatic embryogenesis and shoot regeneration from excised adventitious roots of the rootstock Rosa hybrida L, MoneywayT. Plant Cell Rep, 15:522– 6.

Vijaya, N., Satyanarayana, G., 1991. Effect of culture and growth regulators on in vitro propagation of rose. 209-214 In: Prakash J. Pierik R.L.M. (eds) Horticulture- New tecnologies and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nederlands.

Visessuwan, R., Kawai, T., Mii, M., 1997. Plant regeneration systems from leaf segment culture through embryogenic callus formation of Rosa hybrida and R. canina. Breed Sci., 47:217–222

von Abraham, G.J., Hand, M.E., 1956. Seed dormancy in Rosa as a function of climate. Amer. J. Bot., 4:37-12.

Wegg, S.M., Townsley, P.M., 1983. Ascorbic acid in cultured tissue of briar rose, R. rugosa Thunb. Plant Cell Rep., 2:78-81.

Werner, E.M., Boe, A.A., 1980. In vitro propagation of ‘Malling 7’ apple rootstock. HortScience, 15:509-510.

Wulster, G., Sacalis, J., 1980. Effects of auxin and cytokinins on ethylene evolution and growth of rose callus tissue in sealed vessels. HortScience, 15:736-37.
Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-7085
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2000