Zekeriya ÖZÜDOĞRU, Derviş ÖZDEMİR, Bumin Emre TEKE, Mesut KIRBAŞ

A Study on Morphological and Morphometrical Parameters on the Skull of the Konya Merino Sheep

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to determine the craniometric measurements of the skull of the Konya Merino breed and to reveal the differences between it and other sheep breeds. Material-Method: For this study, ten Konya merino heads were used and craniometric measurements were made from 46 points on the skull. Result: In the study, the skull length of the Konya merino was 274.03 ± 5.23, the frontal width (ectorbitale – ectorbitale) which is the widest region of the skull 123.47 ± 2.60, zygomatic width (the distance between two zygomatic arches) 110.30 ± 1.96 and the distance between the foramen supraorbitales 49.06 ± 2.38. has been found to be. It was determined that both the fronto-nasal and palato-maxillar sutures resembled the letter "V" in Konya merino, while the pariato-frontal suture was in the form of a straight line. When the correlation between index values was examined, it was seen that there was a statistically significant strong positive correlation between I1 (Nasal index) and I2 (Facial Index), but the relationship between other examined features was insignificant. When the statistically significant correlation values of the skull measurements are examined, it is seen that there is a strong negative or positive correlation between the features. While the highest positive correlation was between L5 (premolare – prosthion) and L39 (greatest palatal breadth (measured across the outer borders of the alveoli) features (0.943), the highest negative correlation was L33 (greatest neurocranium breadth-greatest breadth of the alveoli)). braincase (euryon - euryon) and L46 (supraorbital foramina distance) features were found to be (-0.908). Conclusion: As a result, in this study, it is thought that the difference in the craniometric values of Konya merino, which is accepted as the native breed of Turkey, with other sheep breeds, depending on the skull morphology, may be caused by the breed of sheep.

Keywords:

Konya merino Sheep, morphology, craniometrics, skull.,

PDF

___

Akcapinar H. Koyun Yetistiriciligi. Medisan Yayinevi, Ankara. Bölüm 5, 1994, S.171-173.
Al-Sagair O, Al-Mougy SS. A comparative morphometric study on the skull of three phenotypes of Camelus dromedaries. J Camel Pract Res. 2006; 9: 73-77.
Barra R, Carvacal AM, Martinez ME. Variability of cranial morphometrical traits in Suffolk Down Sheep. Austral. J Vet Sci. 2020; 52: 25-31.
Cakir A, Yildirim IG, Ekim O. Craniometric measurements and some anatomical characteristics of the cranium in Mediterranean Monk Seal (Monachus monachus. Hermann 1779). Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2012; 59: 155-162.
Dalga S, Aslan K, Akbulut Y. A morphometric study on the skull of the Hemshin sheep. Van Vet J. 2018; 29:125-129.
Getty R. Sisson and Grossman’s: The anatomy of the domestic animals, 2nd (edn.), Vol I, Philadelphia, USA: WB. Saunders Co. 1975.
Gundemir O, Duro S, Jashari T, Kahvecioglu O, Demircioglu I, Mehmeti H. A study on morphology and morphometric parameters on skull of the Bardhoka autochthonous sheep breed in Kosovo. Anat Histol Embryol. 2020; 49: 365–371.
Jashari T, Duro S, Gundemir O, Szara T, Ilieski V, Mamuti D, Choudhary OP. Morphology, morphometry and some aspects of clinical anatomy in the skull and mandible of Sharri sheep. Biologia. 2022; 77:423–433.
Karimi I, Onar V, Pazvant G, Hadipour MM, Mazaheri Y. The Cranial Morphometric and Morphologic Characteristics of Mehraban Sheep in Western Iran. Global Veterinaria. 2011; 6: 111-117.
Konig H.E., Liebich H.G. Veterinary anatomy of domestic animals. Textbook and color atlas, 6th edition. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart- New York. 2014; 53-91.
Marzban Abbasabadi B, Hajian O, Rahmati S. Investigating the Morphometric Characteristics of Male and Female Zell Sheep Skulls for Sexual Dimorphism. ASJ. 2020; 17: 13-20.
Mohamed R, Driscoll M, Mootoo N. Clinical anatomy of the scull of the Barbados Black Belly sheep in Trinidad. Int J Curr Res Med Sci. 2016; 2: 8-19.
Monfared AL. Clinical anatomy of the skull of Iranian Native sheep. Global Veterinaria. 2013; 10 (13): 271- 275.
NAV. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria, International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature. 5th Edn., Pub. by the Ed. Com. Hannover, Columbia, Gent, Sapparo, USA; 2017.
Onar V., Pazvant S. Skull typology of adult male Kangal dogs. Anat Histol Embryol. 2001; 30:41–48.
Ozcan S, Aksoy G, Kurtul I, Aslan K, Ozudogru Z. A comparative morphometric study on the skull of the Tuj and Morkaraman sheep. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 2010; 16: 111–114.
Ozkan E, Siddiq AB, Kahvecioglu KO, Ozturk M, Onar V. Morphometric analysis of the skulls of domestic cattle (Bos taurus L.) and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis L.) in Turkey. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci. 2019; 43: 532–539.
Ozudogru Z, Ozdemir D, Teke, BE. Konya Merinosunun Mandibula’sı Üzerine Morfometrik Bir Çalısma. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 5: 392-395.
Ozudogru Z, Ilgun R, Ozdemir D. A Morphological and Histological Investigation of the Sinus Interdigitalis in Konya Merino Sheep. Turkish J. Agricul-Food Sci. and Techno. 2021; 9: 1509-1513.
Parés-Casanova PM, Kamal S, Jordana J. On biometrical aspects of the cephalic anatomy of Xisqueta sheep (Catalunya, Spain). Int J Morpol. 2010; 28, 347-351.
Sarma K. Morphological and craniometrical studies on the skull of Kagani goat (Capra hircus) of Jammu region. Int J Morphol. 2006; 24: 449–455.
Shehu S, Bello A, Danmaigiro A. et al. Osteometrical study on age related changes of the skull of Yankasa ram. J Human Anat. 2019; 3:136.
Von Den Driesch A. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University;1976.
Wang X, Lıu A, Zhao J, Elshaer FM, Massoud D. Anatomy of the skull of Saanen goat. An anesthesiology and stereology approach. Int. J. Morphol. 2021; 39: 423-429.
Yilmaz B, Demircioglu I. Morphometric Analysis of the Skull in the Awassi Sheep (Ovis aries) FÜ. Sag Bil Vet Derg. 2021; 34, 1-6.