The Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Quality of Ready-to-Cook Meatballs

The effects of gamma irradiation on microbial quality, lipid oxidation, and sensory characteristics of meatballs were studied, and these effects were compared with the effects on ground beef. Meat samples were irradiated at 0, 3, 6, and 9 kGy, then stored at 4 ± 1 ºC for 14 days. Irradiation resulted in greater microbial inactivation, lower lipid oxidation, and less adverse effects on sensory characteristics in meatballs compared to ground beef. Irradiation of meatballs at 3 kGy resulted in about a 4-log reduction in total microbial count without significantly affecting the quality of the product during the first 3 days of storage. Higher doses or longer storage in air resulted in quality degradation, which could be controlled by proper modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). Thus, irradiation doses approved for ground beef can be safely used with meatballs without significant quality degradation. Further studies combining irradiation and MAP are needed to determine the shelf-life of irradiated meatballs.

The Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Quality of Ready-to-Cook Meatballs

The effects of gamma irradiation on microbial quality, lipid oxidation, and sensory characteristics of meatballs were studied, and these effects were compared with the effects on ground beef. Meat samples were irradiated at 0, 3, 6, and 9 kGy, then stored at 4 ± 1 ºC for 14 days. Irradiation resulted in greater microbial inactivation, lower lipid oxidation, and less adverse effects on sensory characteristics in meatballs compared to ground beef. Irradiation of meatballs at 3 kGy resulted in about a 4-log reduction in total microbial count without significantly affecting the quality of the product during the first 3 days of storage. Higher doses or longer storage in air resulted in quality degradation, which could be controlled by proper modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). Thus, irradiation doses approved for ground beef can be safely used with meatballs without significant quality degradation. Further studies combining irradiation and MAP are needed to determine the shelf-life of irradiated meatballs.

___

  • Roessler, E.B., Pangborn, R.M., Sidel, J.L., Stone, H.: Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired preference, paired difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. J. Food Sci., 1978; 43: 940-943.
  • Roberts, W.T., Weese, J.O.: Shelf life of ground beef patties treated by gamma irradiation. J. Food Protect., 1998; 61: 1387- 1389.
  • Ouattara, B., Giroux, M., Yefsah, R., Smoragiewicz, W., Saucier, L., Borsa, J., Lacroix, M.: Microbiological and biochemical characteristics of ground beef as affected by gamma irradiation, food additives and edible coating film. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2002; 63:: 299-304.
  • Grohs, B.M., Kunz, B.: Use of spice mixtures for the stabilisation of fresh portioned pork. Food Control, 2000; 11: 433-436.
  • Kim, Y.H., Nam, K.C., Ahn, D.U.: Volatile profiles, lipid oxidation and sensory characteristics of irradiated meat from different animal species. Meat Sci., 2002; 61: 257-265.
  • Ahn, D.U., Nam, K.C.: Effects of ascorbic acid and antioxidants on color, lipid oxidation and volatiles of irradiated ground beef. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2004; 71: 151-156.
  • Yanishlieva-Maslarova, N.W., Heinonen, I.M.: Sources of natural antioxidants: vegetables, fruits, herbs, spices and teas. In: Pokorni, J., Yanishlieva, N., Gordon, M. Eds. Antioxidants in Food. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2001.
  • Mahrour, A., Lacroix, M., Nketsa-Tabiri, J., Calderon, N., Gagnon, M.: Antioxidant properties of natural substances in irradiated fresh poultry. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1998; 52: 77-80.
  • Ahn, D.U., Jo, C., Du, M., Olson, D.G., Nam, K.C.: Quality characteristics of pork patties irradiated and stored in different packaging and storage conditions. Meat Sci., 2000; 56: 203-209.
  • Lefebvre, N., Thibault, C., Charbonneau, R., Piette, J.P.G.: Improvement of shelf-life and wholesomeness of ground beef by irradiation. 2. Chemical analysis and sensory evaluation. Meat Sci., 1994; 36: 371-380.