Alp ŞENER, Ahmet DEMİRCAN, Ayfer KELEŞ, Fikret BİLDİK, Kanber KARAKURT

Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia and peripheral nerve block:a randomized prospective study in hand lacerations

Background/aim: To compare local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and peripheral nerve block (PNB) in repairing hand lacerations. Materials and methods: This prospective study was designed as a randomized, controlled, unblinded trial. Fifty four patients with hand lacerations were included in the study. While 23 of these patients had LIA, PNB was performed in the remaining 31 patients. Lidocaine hydrochloride 2% and 27 gauge needles were used. Onset time of the anesthesia, response to the injection and suturing procedures, need for additional anesthetic, and patient satisfaction were compared. Results: No significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of response to injection pain and suture pain (Mann-Whitney U; P = 0.220/P = 0.316). There were also no significant differences between the groups when patient satisfaction (chi-square; P = 0.785) and need for additional local anesthetics (Fisher's exact; P = 0.628) were evaluated. The time to loss of pinprick sensation in the local infiltration group was 1.3 min, whereas in the nerve block group it was 2.2 min. The difference was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Despite the fact that performing PNB in emergency departments requires some experience, it still counts as a convenient method comparable to LIA.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Peripheral nerve block, local infiltration anesthesia, hand lacerations, pain, satisfaction

Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia and peripheral nerve block:a randomized prospective study in hand lacerations

Keywords:

Peripheral nerve block, local infiltration anesthesia, hand lacerations, pain, satisfaction,

PDF

___

Hollander JE, Singer AJ. Evaluation of wounds. In: Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS, editors. Emergency Medicine: a Comprehensive Study Guide. 7th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill; 2004. pp. 287–288.
Singer AJ, Hollander JE. Lacerations and Acute Wounds: an Evidence-Based Guide. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Davis Company; 2003. pp 9–63.
Erdine S. Rejyonel anestezi; Tarihsel perspektif. In: Erdine S, editor. Rejyonel Anestezi. 1st ed. İstanbul, Turkey: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2008. pp. 1–5.
Bruce TA, Bowman JM, Brown ST. Factors that influence patient satisfaction in the emergency department. J Nurs Care Qual 1998; 13: 31–37. 5. Ferrera PC, Chandler R. Anesthesia in the emergency setting: Part I. Hand and foot injuries. Am Fam Physician 1994; 50: 569–573.
Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 633–638.
Hill RG Jr, Patterson JW, Parker JC, Bauer J, Wright E, Heller MB. Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 604–607.
Singer AJ, Mach C, Thode HC Jr, Hemachandra S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Patient priorities with traumatic lacerations. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18: 683–686.
Lee EJ, Khandwala M, Jones CA. A randomised controlled trial to compare patient satisfaction with two different types of local anaesthesia in ptosis surgery. Orbit 2009; 28: 388–391.
Liebmann O, Price D, Mills C, Gardner R, Wang R, Wilson S, Gray A. Feasibility of forearm ultrasonography-guided nerve blocks of the radial, ulnar, and median nerves for hand procedures in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48: 558–562.
Garibaldi S, Anamarli N. Dorsal cutaneous branch of ulnar nerve. An appraisal on the anatomy, injuries and application of conduction velocity studies in diagnosis. Arch Neuropsiquiatr 2000; 58: 637–641.