Shruthi Hegde, Subhas G Babu, Vidya Ajila, Jasmine Shanti Kamath

Bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Ankiloz, kemik ya da fibröz doku ile eklem yüzünün füzyonudur. Temporomandibular eklem (TME) ankilozu, çiğneme, konuşma, oral hijyen sağlanması ve estetik açıdan şekil bozukluğuna neden olabilir. Bu durum, tek taraflı(unilateral) ya da iki taraflı (bilateral) , tam ya da tam olmayan biçimde olabilir. TME ankilozu, travma, local ya da sistemik enflamatuar durumlar, kanserler ve TME enjeksiyonları gibi birçok nedenden oluşabilir. Biz, forceps uygulaması sonucu iki taraflı (bilateral) TME ankilozunun neden olduğu ağzını açma, yemek yeme, konuşma, oral hijyen sağlama güçlüğü ve fasiyal şekil bozukluğu olan olguyu sunuyoruz. Bu sunum, forcepsle doğum uygulaması sırasında buna benzer komplikasyonları önlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Ankylosis is the fusion of joint surfaces by bone or fibrous tissue. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis maycause difficulty in chewing, speech, oral hygiene maintenance, and esthetic disfigurement. This condition can beunilateral or bilateral, complete or incomplete. TMJ ankylosis may occur due to various factors, such as trauma,local and systemic inflammatory conditions, neoplasms, and TMJ infection. Trauma due to forceps deliverycausing bilateral TMJ ankylosis is rare. We report a case with difficulty in mouth opening, eating, speech, oralhygiene maintenance, facial disfigurement as a result of bilateral TMJ ankylosis caused due to trauma by forcepsdelivery. This report implores upon preventing such disabling complications due to forceps delivery.

PDF

___

1. Vasconcelos BCE, Porto GG, Bessa-Nogueira R V. Temporo mandibular joint ankylosis. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2008;74(1): 34-38.
2. Vasconcelos BCE, Bessa-Nogueira RV, Cypriano RV. Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by gap arthroplasty. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E66-9.
3. Roychoudhury A, Parkash H, Trikha A. Functional restoration by gap arthrosplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a report of 50 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:166-9.
4. Gary L. Clayman, Jerold S. Goldberg . The Incidence of Forceps Delivery among Patients with TMJ Problems, Journal of Craniomandibular Practice 1983; 2: 46-50.
5. Movahed R, Mercuri LG. Management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2015;27(1):27– 35.
6. Germane N, Rubenstein L. The effects of forceps delivery on facial growth. Pediatr Dent 1989; 11(3): 193-97.
7. Arakeri G, Kusanale A, Zaki GA, Brennan PA. Pathogenesis of posttraumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:8-12.
8. Obiechina AE , Arotiba JT, Fasola AO Ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint as a complication of forceps delivery: report of a case. West African Journal of Medicine 1999, 18(2):144-146.
9. Sporniak-Tutak K, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Kowalczyk R. Management of temporomandibular ankylosis– compromise or individualization – a literature review. Med Sci Monit, 2011; 17(5): RA111-116.
10. Sawhney CP: Bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: follow- up of 70 patients treated with arthroplasty and acrylic spacer interposition. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1986; 77: 29–38.
11. Sporniak-Tutak K, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Kowalczyk R. Management of temporomandibular ankylosis – compromise or individualization – a literature review. Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2011;17(5):RA111-RA116.
12. Chidzonga MM. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: review of thirty-two cases. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1999;37: 123–126.