Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction?

A species is considered to be "rare" if it exhibits any one of the following attributes: (1) naturally occurs in a narrow geographical area, (2) occupies only one or a few specialised habitats, (3) forms only small population(s) in its range. An "endemic" species, however, grows naturally in a single geographical area, the size of which could be either narrow or relatively large. Not all endemic species are rare, just as not all rare species must necessarily be endemic. Many rare and/or endemic species exhibit one or more of the following attributes which make them especially prone to extinction: (1) narrow (and single) geographical range, (2) only one or a few populations, (3) small population size and little genetic variability, (4) over-exploitation by people, (5) declining population sizes, (6) low reproductive potential, (7) the need for specialised ecological niches, (8) growth that requires stable and nearly constant environments. When habitats of a rare and/or endemic species are damaged and/or fragmented by various human activities, the distribution ranges and population sizes of the species will be reduced, leaving them vulnerable to extinction at a much higher rate than other comparable species. Species that experience any of the above attributes must be given priority and monitored and managed carefully in an effort to promote genetic conservation.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Rare species, endemism, extinction, population, conservation biology

Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction?

Keywords:

Key words: Rare species, endemism, extinction, population, conservation biology,

PDF

___

Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z & Adıgüzel N (2000). Red Data Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta). Turkish Association for Conservation of Nature, Ankara & Van Yüzüncü Yıl University (in Turkish).
Frankham R (2005). Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation. 126: 131-140.
Ghimire SK, McKey D & Aumeeruddy-Th omas Y (2005). Conservation of Himalayan medicinal plants: Harvesting patterns and ecology of two threatened species, Nardostachys grandifl ora DC. and Neopicrorhiza scrophulariifl ora (Pennell) Hong. Biological Conservation 124: 463-475.
Groom MJ, Meff e GK & Carroll CR (2006). Principle of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Inc, Sunderland MA.
Heschel MS & Paige KN (1995). Inbreeding depression, environmental stress and population size variation in Scarlett Gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conservation Biology 9: 126-133.
IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Jones HL & Diamond JM (1976). Short-time-base studies of turnover in breeding birds of the California Channel Islands. Condor 76: 526-549.
Kandemir A (2009). Th e Rediscovery of Some Taxa Th ought to Have Been Extinct in Turkey. Turk J Bot 33: 113-122.
Kolb A & Diekmann M (2005). Eff ects of life history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology 19: 929-938.
Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455-1460.
Primack RB (2006). Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Th omas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT & Lawton JH (2004). Comparative losses of British butterfl ies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crises. Science 303: 1879-1881.
Uysal T & Köse, YB (2009). A New Centaurea L. (Asteraceae) Species from Turkey Turk J Bot 33: 41-46.