Molecular phylogeny of Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) of Anatolia inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA regions

Anatolia hosts 14 of the 22 taxa of genus Galanthus L. The phylogenetic relationships of Galanthus species were explored using DNA sequence data from both nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 70 specimens covering all subdivisions of Galanthus present in Turkey. Our data showed that species of the same geography clustered together phylogenetically, in contrast to the presently recognized taxonomy based on morphological characters. The 5.8S rRNA sequence data by itself is sufficiently informative for constructing phylogenetic trees. Our data confirm the identity of Galanthus koenenianus as a new taxon, well separated from G. alpinus; both are clustered within subseries Viridifolii, rather than within subseries Glaucaefolii in contrast to previous suggestions, but in accordance with their geographical occurrence. G. trojanus also forms a distinct branch within subseries Glaucaefolii. G. krasnovii diverged out of all other Galanthus taxa as a separate branch in all phylogenetic trees. Samples collected based on morphological characters as G. nivalis were clearly different from G. nivalis based on the sequence data in GenBank. Sequencing data also revealed that the G. xvalentinei from locus classicus (ISTF; SYZB 3008) significantly differed from all other Galanthus specimens distributed in Thrace known as G. xvalentinei.

Molecular phylogeny of Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) of Anatolia inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA regions

Anatolia hosts 14 of the 22 taxa of genus Galanthus L. The phylogenetic relationships of Galanthus species were explored using DNA sequence data from both nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 70 specimens covering all subdivisions of Galanthus present in Turkey. Our data showed that species of the same geography clustered together phylogenetically, in contrast to the presently recognized taxonomy based on morphological characters. The 5.8S rRNA sequence data by itself is sufficiently informative for constructing phylogenetic trees. Our data confirm the identity of Galanthus koenenianus as a new taxon, well separated from G. alpinus; both are clustered within subseries Viridifolii, rather than within subseries Glaucaefolii in contrast to previous suggestions, but in accordance with their geographical occurrence. G. trojanus also forms a distinct branch within subseries Glaucaefolii. G. krasnovii diverged out of all other Galanthus taxa as a separate branch in all phylogenetic trees. Samples collected based on morphological characters as G. nivalis were clearly different from G. nivalis based on the sequence data in GenBank. Sequencing data also revealed that the G. xvalentinei from locus classicus (ISTF; SYZB 3008) significantly differed from all other Galanthus specimens distributed in Thrace known as G. xvalentinei.

___

  • Alvarez I, Wendel JF (2003). Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29: 417–434. Artjushenko ZT (1967). Taxonomy of the genus Galanthus L. In: The Daffodil and Tulip Year Book, Vol. 32. London, UK: Royal Horticultural Society, pp. 62–82.
  • Bakış Y, Otu HH, Taşçı N, Meydan C, Bilgin N, Yüzbaşıoğlu S, Sezerman OU (2013). Testing robustness of relative complexity measure method constructing robust phylogenetic trees for Galanthus L. using the relative complexity measure. BMC Bioinformatics 14: 20–31.
  • Baldwin BG, Campbell CS, Porter JM, Sanderson MJ, Wojciechowski MF, Donoghue MJ (1995). Utility of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences in phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82: 247–277.
  • Bishop M, Davis AP, Grimshaw J (2001). Snowdrops: A Monograph of Cultivated Galanthus. Salisbury, Australia: The Griffin Press.
  • Friesen N, Fritsch RM, Blattner FR (2006). Phylogeny and new infrageneric classification of Allium L. (Alliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Aliso 22: 372–395. Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Garnatje T, Vilatersana R (2001). Generic delimitation and phylogeny of the subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae): a combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Bot-London 87: 503–515.
  • Gielly L, Taberlet P (1994). The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenesis: noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Mol Biol Evol 11: 769–777.
  • Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis. Program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucl Acid S 41: 95–98.
  • Mai JC, Coleman AW (1996). The internal transcribed spacer 2 exhibits a common secondary structure in green algae and flowering plants. J Mol Evol 44: 258–271.
  • Jobes DV, Thien LB (1997). A conserved motif in the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is a useful diagnostic marker for plant internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15: 326–334.
  • Kemularia-Nathadze LM (1947). A study of the Caucasian representatives of the genus Galanthus L. Trudy. Tbilisk Botanical Institute Series 2, 11: 165–190.
  • Kimura M (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120.
  • Koch M, Haubold B, Mitchell-Olds T (2001). Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences. Am J Bot 88: 534–544.
  • Lledo MD, Davis AP, Crespo MB, Chase MW, Fay MF (2004). Phylogenetic analysis of Leucojum and Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) based on plastid matK and nuclear ribosomal spacer ITS DNA sequences and morphology. Plant Syst Evol 246: 223–243.
  • Musters W, Boon K, van der Sande CAFM, van Heerikhuizen H, Planta RJ (1990).
  • Functional analysis of transcribed spacers of yeast ribosomal DNA. EMBO J 9: 3989–3996.
  • Muthama Muasya A, Simpson DA, Chase MW (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in Cyperus L. s.l. (Cyperaceae) inferred from plastid DNA sequence data. Bot J Linn Soc 137: 145–153. Nei M, Kumar S (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Agrophysiological and biochemical properties associated with adaptation of Medicago sativa populations to water deficit

Mohamed FARISSI, Abdelaziz BOUIZGAREN, Mustapha FAGHIRE, Adnane BARGAZ, Cherki GHOULAM

Classification of Camellia species from 3 sections using leaf anatomical data with back-propagation neural networks and support vector machines

Wu JIANG, Billur Barshan ÖZAKTAŞ, Nitin MANTRI, Zhengming TAO, Hongfei LU

Shortcut to long-distance developing of a tissue culture medium: micropropagation of mature almond cultivars as a case study

Mehmet Nuri NAS, Yüksel BÖLEK, Nevzat SEVGİN

The revision of genus Seseli (Umbelliferae) in Turkey

Ebru Doğan GÜNER, Hayri DUMAN

Genetic fidelity assessment of encapsulated in vitro tissues of Bacopa monnieri after 6 months of storage by using ISSR and RAPD markers

Joe Virgin Largia MUTHIAH, Karutha Pandian SHUNMUGIAH, Ramesh MANIKANDAN

A phylogenetic analysis of genus Onobrychis and its relationships within the tribe Hedysareae (Fabaceae)

Nadeesha Lewke BANDARA, Alessio PAPINI, Stefano MOSTI, Terence BROWN, Lydia Mary Josephine SMITH

Pollenmorphology of Hymenosphace and Aethiopis sections of the genus(Lamiaceae) in Turkey Salvia

Musa DOĞAN, Ahmet KAHRAMAN, Birol BAŞER, Hülya ÖZLER, Ahter FİŞNE YAVRU, Sevil PEHLİVAN, Ferhat CELEP, Safi BAGHERPOUR

Monitoring of vascular plant diversity in a changing climate in the alpine zone of the Central Greater Caucasus

Khatuna GIGAURI, Maia AKHALKATSI, George NAKHUTSRISHVILI, Otar ABDALADZE

Callogenesis and production of anthocyanin and chlorophyll in callus cultures of vegetative and floral explants in Rosa gallica and Rosa hybrida (Rosaceae)

Roshanak TARRAHI, Farkhondeh REZANEJAD

Morphological and ecological evidence for a new infraspecific taxon of the wallflower Erysimum cheiri (Brassicaceae) as an indigenous endemism of the southwestern Mediterranean

Samira OUARMIM, Chloé DUBSET, Errol VELA