Lüpende (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet.) protoplast izolasyonu: Optimum eksplant kaynağı ve izolasyon şartlarının tespiti

Effects of cultural factors on the yield, viability and division of protoplasts were investigated in Lupinus mutabilis Sweet containing a high protein content as well as a reasonable oil content which may make this species an alternative crop to soybean in Turkey. Explants from different in vitro seedling parts were evaluated on the suitability of protoplast isolation and viability. Leaf mesophyll was the most suitable tissue as a protoplast source. Pectinases as well as cellulases were essential for the isolation of protoplasts. Nine percent (w/v) mannitol was suitable to stabilise osmotic pressure together with low salt concentrations in washing and isolation solutions while 9% (w/v) glucose gave better results in culture medium. Shoot tip protoplasts exhibited a higher viability than other protoplast sources. Prolonged viability was observed when protoplasts were cultured in low density media. Techniques such as nurse cultures and electro-stimulation were ineffective. Sustained division of protoplasts in lupin (all sources) was not possible. However, techniques applied in this study may help other researchers, especially those studying protoplast culture of recalcitrant plant species, as well as further studies on this species.

Protoplast isolation in lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet): Determination of optimum explant sources and isolation conditions

Effects of cultural factors on the yield, viability and division of protoplasts were investigated in Lupinus mutabilis Sweet containing a high protein content as well as a reasonable oil content which may make this species an alternative crop to soybean in Turkey. Explants from different in vitro seedling parts were evaluated on the suitability of protoplast isolation and viability. Leaf mesophyll was the most suitable tissue as a protoplast source. Pectinases as well as cellulases were essential for the isolation of protoplasts. Nine percent (w/v) mannitol was suitable to stabilise osmotic pressure together with low salt concentrations in washing and isolation solutions while 9% (w/v) glucose gave better results in culture medium. Shoot tip protoplasts exhibited a higher viability than other protoplast sources. Prolonged viability was observed when protoplasts were cultured in low density media. Techniques such as nurse cultures and electro-stimulation were ineffective. Sustained division of protoplasts in lupin (all sources) was not possible. However, techniques applied in this study may help other researchers, especially those studying protoplast culture of recalcitrant plant species, as well as further studies on this species.

___

  • 1.Sator, C., In vitrobreeding of lupins. Perspectives for peas andlupins as protein crops. (R Thomson and R Casey, eds.) In: Proc.Int. Symp. Protein Production from Legumes in Europe, Sorrento,Italy, pp. 79-87 (1982).
  • 2.Hondelmann, W., The lupin - ancient and modern crop. TheorApp Genet. 68:1-8 (1984).
  • 3.Özkaynak, ‹., Mülayim, M., Tamkoç, A., Babao¤lu, M., Topal A.,Konya flartlar›nda yetifltirilen yerel lüpenle yabanc› kökenli ac› vetatl› lüpenlerin karfl›laflt›r›lmas›. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, Çay›r-Mera ve Yem Bitkileri Bildirileri, Cilt 3, s. 32-35, Bornova,‹zmir.
  • 4.Williams, W., The current status of the crop lupins. In: Proc. IVthInt. Lupin Conf., Geraldton, Western Australia pp. 1-13 (1986).
  • 5.Vuillaume, E., Verchere, J., Hoff, T.. In vitroculture of lupins. InProc IVth Int Lupin Conf., Geraldton, Australia p. 287 (1986).
  • 6.Schafer-Menuhr, A., Isolation and Kultur vonLupinenprotoplasten I. Protoplasten aus Blattern von LupinusangustifoliusSorte Kubesa. Landbauforschung Volkenrode37(3):117-120 (1987).
  • 7.Binding, H., Hehls, R., Kock, R., Finger, J., Mordhorst, G.,Comparative studies on protoplast regeneration in herbaceousspecies and Dicotyledoneae class. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 101:119-130 (1981).
  • 8.Böhmer, P., Meyer, B., Jacobsen, H-J., Thidiazuron-inducedhigh frequency of shoot induction and plant regeneration inprotoplast derived pea callus. Plant Cell Rep. 15:26-29 (1995).
  • 9.Hammatt, N., Jones, B., Davey, M.R., Plant regeneration fromseedling explants and cotyledon protoplasts of Glycine argyreaTind. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 25:669-672 (1989).
  • 10.Tegeder, M., Schieder, O., Pickardt, T., Breakthrough in the plantregeneration from protoplasts (Vicia fabaand V. narbonensis). In:Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology (M. Terzi etal., eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 85-90(1995).
  • 11.Murashige, T., Skoog, F., A revised medium for rapid growth andbioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497 (1962).
  • 12.Frearson, E.M., Power, J.B., Cocking, E.C., The isolation, cultureand regeneration of Petunialeaf protoplasts. Dev. Biol. 33:130-137 (1973).
  • 13.Power, J.B., Frearson, E.M., George, D., Evans, P.K., Berry, S.F.,Haywood, C., Cocking, E.C., The isolation, culture andregeneration of leaf protoplasts in the genus Petunia. Plant Sci.Lett. 7:51-55 (1976).
  • 14.Kao, K.N., Michayluk, M.R., Nutritional requirements for growthof Vicia hajastanacells and protoplasts at a very low populationdensity in liquid media. Planta 126:105-110 (1975).
  • 15.Kao, K.N., Chromosomal behaviour in somatic hybrids ofsoybean-Nicotiana glauca. Mol. Gen. Genet. 150:225-230(1977).
  • 16.Chu, C.C., Wang, C.C., Sun, C.S., Su, C.H., Yin, K.C., Chu, C.Y.,Bi, Y.F., Establishment of an efficient medium for anther cultureof rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources.Sci. Sinica 18: 659-668 (1975).
  • 17.Jones, B., Lynch, P.T., Handley, G.J., Malure, R.S., Blackhall,N.W., Hammat, N., Power, J.B., Cocking, E.C., Davey, M.R.,Equipment for the large-scale electromanipulation of plantprotoplasts. BioTechniques, 16:312-321 (1994).
  • 18.Ochatt, S.J., Power, J.B., Plant regeneration from culturedprotoplasts of higher plants. In: Plant Biotechnology:Comprehensive Biotechnology, Second Supplement (MW Fowler,GS Warren and M Moo-Young, eds.). Pergamon Press, pp. 99-127 (1992).
  • 19.Ge, K., Wang, Y., Yuan, X., Huang, P., Yang, J., Huangv, J.Q.,Tan, C.C., Lee, N., Testa, D., Regeneration of plants fromprotoplasts of Adzuki Bean (Phaseolus angularis Wright) In:Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 23. PlantProtoplasts and Genetic Engineering IV, (YPS Bajaj, ed.) Springer-Verlag, pp. 71-77 (1989).
  • 20.Lockshin, R.A., Zakeri, Z., Programmed cell death and apoptosis.In: Apoptosis: The molecular basis of cell death. Cold SpringHarbor Laboratory Press, pp. 47-59 (1991).
  • 21.Feher, A., Dudits, D., Plant protoplasts for cell fusion and directDNA uptake: culture and regeneration systems. In: Plant Cell andTissue Culture. (K. Vasil and Trevor A. Thorpe, eds.). KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 71-118(1994).
  • 22.Anthony, P., Davey, M.R., Power, J.B., Washington, C., Lowe,K.C., Synergistic enhancement of protoplast growth byoxygenated perfluorocarbon and Pluronic F68. Plant Cell Rep.13:251-255 (1994).
  • 23.Warren, G.S., The cell biology of plant cell culture systems. In:Plant Biotechnology: Comprehensive Biotechnology. SecondSupplement (MW Fowler, GS Warren and M Moo-Young, eds.).Pergamon Press, pp. 1-17 (1992).
  • 24.Wink, M., Plant breeding: importance of plant secondarymetabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivores.Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:225-233 (1988).
  • 25.Ferrer, M.A., Pedreno, M.A., Calderon, A.A., Munoz, R., Barcelo,A.R., Distribution of isoflavones in lupin hypocotyls. Possiblecontrol of cell wall peroxidase activity involved in lignification.Physiol. Plant. 79:610-616 (1990).
  • 26.Phansiri, S., Miyake, H., Maeda, E., Taniguchi, T., Effects ofelectro- and chemical fusion treatment on cell wall formation andcell division of plant protoplasts. Jpn. J. Crop. Sci. 63(4):706-713 (1994