Development of a tractor dynamic stability index calculator utilizing some tractor specifications

To examine the effects of different geometries and mass specifications of a tractor operating across irregular sloping grounds on the lateral stability of this machine, a dynamic model was developed. In the proposed model, overturn and skid instabilities were studied and the tractor stability indexes were formulated (i.e. TSIoverturn and TSIskid). Using a modified Excel spreadsheet package employing the parameters of the model, the TSIs were then determined. Finally, the effects of variation in the parameters of the model on TSIs were evaluated. The results of the analyses indicate that changing the tractor mass moment of inertias about the x- and y-axes had no influence on TSIskid, whereas increasing the tractor mass moment of inertias about the x-axis by 71% led to a 2.5% reduction of TSIoverturn and increasing the tractor mass moment of inertias about the y-axis by 71% led to a 1.8% reduction of TSIoverturn. However, increasing the wheel-ground coefficient of friction from 0.34 to 0.84 improved TSIskid by up to 27%. Moreover, the effect of tractor wheel track width and the height of its center of gravity on TSIoverturn was greater than the effect of the tractor wheel base on this stability index. Therefore, the best strategy for stabilizing a tractor against overturn is to lower the tractor's center of gravity and increase the tractor's wheel track width simultaneously.

Development of a tractor dynamic stability index calculator utilizing some tractor specifications

To examine the effects of different geometries and mass specifications of a tractor operating across irregular sloping grounds on the lateral stability of this machine, a dynamic model was developed. In the proposed model, overturn and skid instabilities were studied and the tractor stability indexes were formulated (i.e. TSIoverturn and TSIskid). Using a modified Excel spreadsheet package employing the parameters of the model, the TSIs were then determined. Finally, the effects of variation in the parameters of the model on TSIs were evaluated. The results of the analyses indicate that changing the tractor mass moment of inertias about the x- and y-axes had no influence on TSIskid, whereas increasing the tractor mass moment of inertias about the x-axis by 71% led to a 2.5% reduction of TSIoverturn and increasing the tractor mass moment of inertias about the y-axis by 71% led to a 1.8% reduction of TSIoverturn. However, increasing the wheel-ground coefficient of friction from 0.34 to 0.84 improved TSIskid by up to 27%. Moreover, the effect of tractor wheel track width and the height of its center of gravity on TSIoverturn was greater than the effect of the tractor wheel base on this stability index. Therefore, the best strategy for stabilizing a tractor against overturn is to lower the tractor's center of gravity and increase the tractor's wheel track width simultaneously.

___

  • Abubakar MS, Ahmad D, Akande FB (2010) A review of farm tractor overturning accident and safety. Pertanika J Sci Technol 18: 377–385.
  • Abu-Hamdeh NH, Al-Jalil HF (2004) Computer simulation of stability and control of tractor-trailed implement combinations under different operating conditions. Bragantia Camp 63: 149– 1
  • Ahmadi I (2011) Dynamics of tractor lateral overturn on slopes under the influence of position disturbance (model development). J Terramechanics 48: 339–346.
  • Goldenhar LM, Schulte PA (1996) Methodological issues for intervention research in occupational health and safety. Am J Ind Med 29: 289–294.
  • Kise M, Zhang Q (2006) Sensor-in-the-loop tractor stability control: look-ahead attitude prediction and field tests. Comput Electron Agr 52: 107–118.
  • Mashadi B, Nasrolahi H (2009) Automatic control of a modified tractor to work on steep side slopes. J Terramechanics 46: 299–311.
  • Myers ML (2008) Continuous overturn control of compactors/ rollers by rollover protective structures. Int J Veh Saf 3: 45−59.
  • Myers ML, Cole HP, Westneat SC (2006) Seat belt use during tractor overturns. J Agric Saf Health 12: 43−49.
  • National Safety Council. Accident Facts - 2001 Edition. National Safety Council, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Purschwitz MA (1992) Farm and agricultural injury statistics. In: Safety and Health for Production Agriculture (Ed. DJ Murphy). ASABE, St. Joseph, MI, USA, p. 253.
  • Silleli H, Dayıoğlu MA, Gültekin A, Ekmekçi K, Yıldız MA, Akay E, Saranlı G (2007) Anchor mechanism to increase the operator clearance zone on narrow-track wheeled agricultural tractors: prototype and first tests. Biosyst Eng 97: 153–161.
  • Spencer HB (1978) Stability and control of two-wheel drive tractors and machinery on sloping ground. J Agric Eng Res 23: 169– 1
  • Vitas N, Torisu R, Takeda J (1988) Determining inertia tensor of farm tractors. J Fac Agr Iwate Univ 19: 37–54.
  • Yoder AM, Murphy DJ (2000) Evaluation of the farm and agricultural injury classification code and follow-up questionnaire. J Agric Saf Health 6: 71–80.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK