Assessment of fruit characteristics and genetic variation among naturally growingwild fruit Elaeagnus angustifolia accessions
Elaeagnus angustifolia L. is a deciduous wild-growing fruit species that plays significant roles in maintaining ecosystem functions in arid regions. In the present study, the fruit characteristics and genetic variations among 56 E. angustifolia accessions collected from the Central Anatolian region of Turkey were determined. The majority of the variations were observed in fruit characteristics. Results revealed that fruit weights varied between 0.59 g and 2.56 g, fruit lengths between 1.13 cm and 2.58 cm, fruit widths between 0.86 cm and 1.67 cm, fruit shape indexes between 0.52 and 0.92, and pedicle lengths between 1.95 mm and 7.74 mm. The seed lengths and widths varied respectively between 1.02 cm and 2.44 cm and 0.44 cm and 0.62 cm. Seven RAPD and 15 ISSR primers were used for genetic analysis and the genetic distance among the genotypes was between 0.00 and 0.34. All genotypes except two were distinguished, and relatively high-level genetic diversity was investigated. This study offers significant information for the evaluation and conservation of the genetic resources of E. angustifolia. Conservation procedures should be designed and implemented because of the loss of genotypes by anthropogenic impacts.
Assessment of fruit characteristics and genetic variation among naturally growingwild fruit Elaeagnus angustifolia accessions
Elaeagnus angustifolia L. is a deciduous wild-growing fruit species that plays significant roles in maintaining ecosystem functions in arid regions. In the present study, the fruit characteristics and genetic variations among 56 E. angustifolia accessions collected from the Central Anatolian region of Turkey were determined. The majority of the variations were observed in fruit characteristics. Results revealed that fruit weights varied between 0.59 g and 2.56 g, fruit lengths between 1.13 cm and 2.58 cm, fruit widths between 0.86 cm and 1.67 cm, fruit shape indexes between 0.52 and 0.92, and pedicle lengths between 1.95 mm and 7.74 mm. The seed lengths and widths varied respectively between 1.02 cm and 2.44 cm and 0.44 cm and 0.62 cm. Seven RAPD and 15 ISSR primers were used for genetic analysis and the genetic distance among the genotypes was between 0.00 and 0.34. All genotypes except two were distinguished, and relatively high-level genetic diversity was investigated. This study offers significant information for the evaluation and conservation of the genetic resources of E. angustifolia. Conservation procedures should be designed and implemented because of the loss of genotypes by anthropogenic impacts.
___
- Akbolat D, Ertekin C, Menges HO, Guzel E, Ekinci K (2008). Physical and nutritional properties of oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) growing in Turkey. Asian J Chem 20: 2358–2366.
- Asadiar LS, Rahmani F, Siami A (2012). Assessment of genetic diversity in the Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) based on ISSR genetic markers. Rev Cienc Agron 44: 310–316.
- Ayaz FA, Kadıoğlu A, Doğru A (1999). Soluble sugar composition of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. var. orientalis (L.) Kuntze (Russian olive) fruits. Turk J Bot 23: 349–354.
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–15.
- Ercisli S (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet Resour Crop Ev 51: 419–435.
- Ersoy N, Kalyoncu IH, Elidemir AY, Tolay I (2013). Some physico- chemical and nutritional properties of Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) fruit grown in Turkey. International Journal of Biological, Veterinary, Agricultural and Food Engineering 7: 179–181.
- Garkava-Gustavsson L, Persson HA, Nybom H, Rumpunen K (2005). RAPD-based analysis of genetic diversity and selection of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) material for ex situ conservation. Genet Resour Crop Ev 52: 723–735.
- Gilman EF, Watson DG (1993). Elaeagnus angustifolia Russian Olive. Fact Sheet ST-233. Gainesville, FL, USA: Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
- Hu YP, Wang L, Xie XL, Yang J, Li L, Zhang HG (2010). Genetic diversity of wild populations of Rheum tanguticum endemic to China as revealed by ISSR analysis. Biochem Syst Ecol 38: 264–274.
- Mohammed FI, Al-Essam K, Shafagojy A, Afifi FU (2006). Investigation of the direct effects of the alcoholic extract of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Elaeagnaceae) on dispersed intestinal smooth muscle cells of guinea pig. Sci Pharm 74: 21–30.
- Rohlf FJ (2000). NTSYS-pc, Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.11. Setauket, NY, USA: Exeter.
- Stannard M, Ogle D, Holzworth L, Scianna J, Sunleaf E (2002). History, biology, ecology, suppression, and revegetation of Russian olive sites (Elaeagnus angustifolia, L.). Plant Materials Technical Note No. MT-43. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture.
- Uzun A, Gulsen O, Kafa G, Seday U (2009). Field performance and molecular diversification of lemon selections. Sci Hortic 120: 473–478.
- Wang Q, Ruan X, Huang J, Xu N, Yan Q (2006) Intra-specific genetic relationship analyses of Elaeagnus angustifolia based on RP- HPLC biochemical markers. J Zhejiang Univ-SC B 7: 272–278.
- Wang Y, Qin Y, Du Z, Yan G (2012). Genetic diversity and differentiation of the endangered tree Elaeagnus mollis Diels (Elaeagnus L.) as revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 40: 25–33.