Kışlık ve Yazlık Ekilen Bazı Nohut Çeşitlerine Kimyasal Uygulamaların Etkisi

Bu araştırma Doğu Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsünde 2012 ve 2013 yıllarında yürütülmüştür. Dört nohut çeşidinde (İnci, Hasanbey, Seçkin, Aydın) kimyasal uygulamaların (Thidiazuron, thephon+Cyclanilide+Thidiazuron, Glyphosate, Ethephon+Cyclanilide) ve farklı ekim zamanlarının (kış ve erken ilkbahar) agronomik özellikler verim ve çimlenme üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Kışlık ekimde bitki başına en fazla bakla ve tohum sayısı (sırasıyla 79,78-83,52) Aydın çeşidinin Ethephon+cyclanilide uygulamasında olurken, bitki başına en düşük bakla ve tohum sayısı (47,12 -52,5 ve 47,28-49,5 sırasıyla) Seçkin ve Hasanbey çeşitlerinin kontrol gruplarında bulunmuştur. Dolu bakla sayısı kontrol grubunda (Hasanbey) 41,96 ile Ethephon+siklanilid (Aydın) uygulamasında 68,99 arasında değişmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Nohut, Farklı ekim zamanı, Bitki düzenleyicileri, Agronomik özellikler

The Effects of Chemical Treatments on Chickpea Varieties Sown Winter and Early Spring

This research was carried out in the experimental area of the Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute in 2012 and 2013. In the study, four different chemical applications (Thidiazuron, Ethephon+cyclanilide + Thidiazuron, Glyphosate, Ethephon+cyclanilide) were used in four chickpea cultivars (İnci, Hasanbey, Seçkin and Aydın), in two different sowing times for winter (December), Summer (February) and harvest maturity. It was aimed to determine some agronomic characteristics of the plant, its yield and its effects on the germination of seeds. Average and the standard deviation values of the number of major branches (1.75±0.51), the number of minor branches (6.69±3.95), the total number of pods (60.84±27.83), Number of empty pods (6.57±3.36), number of full pods (54.64±25.75), number of seeds (63.60±30.56), seed yield (23.55±11.31) differed between 4 chickpea varieties in winter sowing. In chickpea cultivars without chemical applications average and the standard deviation values of the number of major branches (1.84±0.42), the number of minor branches (7.54±4.61), the total number of pods (55.19±14.55), the number of empty pods (6.87±3.21), the number of full pods (48.68±12.9), the number of seeds (58.12±15.86), the grain yield (21.03±6.59) varied between the mean and standard deviation values. Average and the standard deviation values of the number of major branches (2.07±0.95), the number of minor branches (11.77±10.13), the total number of pods (52.59±18.06), the number of empty pods 5.72±3.74, number of full pods (47.4±15.25), number of grains (55.14±19.12), grain yield (18.36±6.46) in chickpea varieties with chemical applications exhibited difference among chickpea cultviars during in summer sowing. The number of major branches (1.94±0.91), the number of minor branches (12.83±11.56), the total number of pods (56.27±19.82), the number of empty pods (6.59±4.7) in cultivars , the number of full pods (49.82±17.18), the number of seeds (59.06±20.73), the grain yield (19.88±7.42) varied between the mean and standard deviation values during summer sowing season.

Keywords:

Chickpeas, sowing dates, plant regulators, Agronomic characteristics,

PDF

___

Anonymous, 2010. Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Investment Support and Promotion Agency Turkish Agricultural Sector Report, July.
Çağırgan, MI.,& Toker, C. (2001). Suitable for Winter Cultivation (Cicer arietinum L.) Breeding; II. Cold Tolerant and Anthracnose (Ascochyta Rabiei) Hardiness observations. IV. Field Crops Congress, 17-21 September, Tekirdağ.
Dwivedi, SL., Sahrawat, KL.,Upadhyaya, HD., & Ortiz, R. (2013). Food Nutrition and Agrobiodiversity Under Global Climate Change, Advances In Agronmy,120,1-128.
Friedman, M. (1996). Nutritional value of proteins from different food sources. A review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44, 6±29. Küsmenoğlu, I. (1990). Ascohyta Blight of Chickpea: Inheritance and Relationship to seed size, Morphological Traits and Isozyme Variation. Washington State University Department for the Degree of Master of science In Agronmyusa, 81Pp.
Mart, D. 2004. Evaluation of the Effect of Sowing Times on Yield and Vegetal Characteristics of Some Chickpea (cicer arietinum l.) Varieties in Çukurova Conditions, 5th Seed Congress, 19-23 October 2014, Diyarbakır.
Math, G. (2018). Evaluation of mechanical harvesting efficiency in defoliated mungbean genotypes. Journal of Food Legumes, 31(4), 226-229.
Muehlbauer, F.J.and K.B. Singh, 1987, Genetics of chickpea. P. 99-125.In M.C. Saxena and K.B. Singh (ed) The chickpea, CAB Int, Oxon UK.
Slim, S.N., Saxena. M.C.,1993Adaptation of Spring-Sown chickpea to the Mediterranean Basin.II. Factors ınfluencing Yield under Drought, Field Crops Research, 34, 137-146.
Şehirali, S. (1988). Edible Grain Legumes. Ank. Fame. Zir. Faculty publications: 1089, Ankara, 435s.
Tethowan, RM., Turner,MA., & Chattha,TM., (2010). Breeding Strtegies to Adapt crops to achanging climate, In: Lobell D, Andburke M (EDS) Climate change and food security: Adapting Agriculture to Awarmer World. Springer, Dordrecht, Enetherlands,Pp.154-174.
Thudi M, Bohra A, Nayak SN, Varghese N, Shah TM, Penmetsa RV, Thirunavukkarasu N, Gudipati S, Gaur PM, Kulwal PL, Upadhyaya HD, KaviKishor PB, Winter P, Kahl G, Town CD, Kilian A, Cook DR, Varshney RK (2011) Novel SSR markers from BAC- end sequences, Dart arrays and a comprehensive genetic map with 1,291 marker loci for chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). PLoS One 6(11):1–12
Üstün, A. & Gülümser, A. (2003). Determination of Appropriate Sowing Time for Chickpea in the Central Black Sea Region . Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University (JAFAG), 2003 (2).
Veeranna, G., Rao, P. J. M., & Reddy, P. R. R. (2020). Evaluation of defoliants and detection of its residues as harvesting aids in greengram (Vigna radiata L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(4), 1810-1812.
Yorgancılar, M.,Atalay, E., Bayrak H., Hakkı, EE., Önder, M.,& Babaoğlu, M. (2008). Determination of genetic diversity among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) populations collected from Konya region using Issr markers, Selçuk University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 22(46), 1-5.