Performance of Legumes-Turnip Mixtures with Different Seed Rates

This study aimed to investigate appropriate seed rates for legume-turnip intercrops under different harvest stages. Turnip (Brassica rapa L. var. rapa) was sown with common vetch (Vicia sativa L.), Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz) and pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L. Poir) in 2014 with four different combinations (100% legume, 75% legume + 25% turnip, 50% legume + 50% turnip, 100% turnip) and catted in two different times when the beginning and end of the flowering of turnip. The study was conducted in Yozgat-Turkey with three replicates. Hay yield, protein yield, ADF, NDF, Ca, Mg, P, K, Land Equivalent Ratio, Competitive Ratio and Aggressivity characteristics were determined in view of the combinations. The results of this study, 50%HV + 50%T and sole pea harvested turnip was at the beginning of flowering stage were the best treatments. On the other hand, when harvest was done at end of the flowering of turnip 50%P + 50%T, 75%P + 25%T and 50%HV + 50%T intercropping were the high yielding treatment.

___

Aasen A, Baron VS, Clayton GW, Dick AC, McCartney DH. 2004. Swath grazing potential of spring cereals, field pea and mixtures with other species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 84, 1051-1058. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P03-143.

Akhter N, Alim AMd, Islam MM, Naher Z, Rehman MA, Iqbal Hossain SM. 2004. Evaluation of mixed and intercropping of lentil and wheat. Journal Agronomy. 3: 48-51.

Anlarsal AE, Yagbasanlar T. l996. Effect on forage production in terms of different ratios mixtures Vetch (Vicia sativa L.) with of some cereal arid conditions in Çukurova. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 20:157-l63.

Anonymous. 1971. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. N.A.S. Washington D.C. 55p.

Atis I, Kokten K, Hatipoglu R, Yılmaz S, Atak M, Can E. 2012. Plant density and mixture ratio effects on the competition between common vetch and wheat. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 6(3): 498‐505.

Avcıoglu R, Hatipoglu R, Karadag Y. 2009. Forage Legumes, skin II. Agriculture and rural ministry directorate general of agricultural production and development. Izmir, p. 402-443.

Aydın İ, Uzun F. 2002. Meadow-pasture management and reformation. Ondokuz Mayıs University No:9, Samsun, 313 p (in Turkish).

Bantie YB, Abera FA, Woldegiorgis TD. 2014. Competition Indices of Intercropped Lupine (Local) and Small Cereals in Additive Series in West Gojam, North Western Ethiopia, American Journal of Plant Sciences, doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.59143.

Bora PC. (1999). Competition studies in intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum), rapeseed (Brassica campestris) and pea (Pisum sativum). Indian Journal Agronomy. 44: 509-513.

Carr PM, Horsley RD, Poland WW. 2004. Barley, oat and cerealpea mixtures as dryland forages in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal. 96: 677- 684.

Copur Dogrusoz M, Mut H, Gulumser E, Basaran U. 2014. Evaluation of Forage Yield and Quality of Forage Turnip x Legume mixtures. Mediterranean seminars. No.9 135-138p. Greece.

Eğritaş Ö, Önal Aşcı Ö. 2015. Determination of some mineral matter contents in common vetch ‐ cereals mixtures. Academic Journal of Agriculture. 4(1):13‐18.

Esmaeili A, Sadeghpourb A, Hosseini SMB, Jahanzad E, Chaichi MR, Hashemi M. 2011. Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata), International Journal of Plant Production. ISSN: 1735-6814 (Print), 1735-8043.

Gülümser E. 2016. Determination of some yield and quality characteristics of silage corn after hungarian vetch + cereals mixtures sowing in Middle Anatolia conditions. Doctorate Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University. The Graudate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Samsun.

Hertrampf JW, Pascual FP. 2000. Handbook on ingredients for aquaculture feeds. Kluwer Academic Publis, Dordrecht, Boston, London. p. 573.

Khan S, Khan MA, Akmal M, Ahmad M, Zafar M, Jabeen A. 2014. Efficiency of Wheat Brassica Mixtures With Different Seed Rates in Rainfed Areas of Potohar-Pakistan. Pakistan Journal Botany. 46(2): 759-766.

Kidambi SP, Matches AG, Griggs TC. 1989. Variability for Ca, Mg, K, Cu, Zn and K/(Ca+Mg) ratio among 3 wheat grassess and sainfoin on the southern high plains. Journal of Range Management. 42: 316‐322.

Kumar N, Prakash V, Mina BL, Gopinath KA, Srivastva AK. 2008. Evaluation of toria (Brassica campestris) and lentil (Lens culinaris) varieties in intercropping system with wheat (Triticum aestivum) under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agron. 53: 47-50.

Lardner HA, Kumar R, Darambazar E, Damiran D, McKinnon JJ. 2016. Comparison of Chemical Composition and Rumen Degradation Kinetics of Three Forages: Whole Plant Barley, Whole Plant Foxtail Millet and Grass-Legume Hay. Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 8, No. 6.

Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD. 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Res., 99: 106–113.

Maynard LA. 1947. Animal nutrition. 2nd edition. McGraw Hill publisher.

McGilchrist CA. 1965. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics, 21: 975–985.

Orak A, Ateş E, Varol F. 2004. Relationships between Some Morphological and Agricultural Properties with Nutritive Value in Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) at Different Growth Stages. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 10 (4) 410-415.

Rankin M. 1989. A Look at Pea and Small Grain Mixtures. (http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/PeaSmallGrainMix.htm). Prakash OM. 1992. Intercropping of potato with mustard is profitable on ravine terraces of Agra. Indian Fmg. 41: 3.

Ross SM, King JR, O’Donovan JT, Spaner D. 2004. Forage Potential of Intercropping Berseem Clover with Barley, Oat, or Triticale. Agronomy Journal. 96:1013–1020.

Singh RK, Kumar H, Singh AK. 2010. Brassica Based Intercropping Systems- A Revıew. Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221 005, India. Page: 253 – 266, ID: ARCC1361.

Smith RG, Atwood LW, Warren ND. 2014. Increased Productivity of a Cover Crop Mixture Is Not Associated with Enhanced Agroecosystem Services. Plos One www.plosone.org. 1-8.

Srivastava RK, Bohra TS. 2006. Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping in relation to row ratio, Indian mustard variety and fertility levels. Indian J. Agron., 51: 107-111.

Tan M, Serin Y. 1996. A study on the determination of optimum mixture rates and cutting stages for different vetch + cereal mixtures. Ataturk University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 27 (4): 475-489.

Willey RW. 1979. Intercropping-Its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts. 32: 1-10.

Willey RW, Rao MR. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture. 16, 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Excretion of Ca, Mg, Zn and Cu Through Excreta of Laying Hens Fed Two Different Levels of Protein with and without Phytase

Skender MUJİ, Alltane KRYEZİU, Muhamet KAMBERİ, Ragip KASTRATİ, Nuridin MESTANİ

Effect of Solid-State Fermentation on Main Nutritional Components, Some Minerals, Condensed Tannin and Phenolic Compounds of Olive Leaves

Aydın ALTOP

Kırsal Bölgelerde Tarımsal Atıkların Kontrolü ve Yenilenebilir Biyokütle Enerji Teknolojileri İle Sera Gazı Emisyonlarının Azaltım Potansiyelinin İncelenmesi

Çağdaş GÖNEN

An Investigation of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activity of Nettle (Urtica dioica L.), Mint (Mentha piperita), Thyme (Thyme serpyllum) and Chenopodium album L. Plants from Yaylacık Plateau, Giresun, Turkey

Duygu KÜLCÜ, Cavidan GÖKIŞIK, Sinem AYDIN

Sera İşletmelerinde Yağmur Sularının Hasadı ve Depolama Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesi

Abdullah BAYTORUN, Zeynep ZAİMOĞLU, Mustafa ÜNLÜ

Fertigasyon ve Mikoriza Uygulamalarının Tarla Koşullarında Biber Bitkisinin (Capsicum annum L.) Verimine ve Besin Elementleri Alımına Etkileri#

Ahmet DEMİRBAŞ, Zülküf KAYA, ÇAĞDAŞ AKPINAR, İBRAHİM ORTAŞ

Comparison of Leavening Ability of Kluyveromyces lactis in Different Bread Dough Formulation

Bekir Gökçen MAZI

İstanbul İlinde En Uygun İçme Süt Tipinin Belirlenmesi

Ahmet Semih Uzundumlu

Comparison of IPARD I and IPARD II Programmes as a Source of Rural Development Financing in Turkey

Ender KAYA, Aykut ÖRS

Determination of Molybdenum Contents and Relation of Some Heavy Metals in the Soil of Meadow-Pasture Terraces Between Kırıkhan-Reyhanlı

Mehmet YALÇIN, KERİM MESUT ÇİMRİN