Ekmeklik Buğday ve Mısırda Üst Gübre Olarak Azot Stabilizatörlü ÜreKullanımının Bazı Verim ve Kalite Kriterleri Üzerine EtkilerininDeğerlendirilmesi

Bu araştırmada; üst gübre olarak Üre ve azot stabilizatörü olan “Nutrisphere-N’li Üre” gübresi kullanımının ekmeklik buğdayın ve mısırın bazı verim ve kalite kriterleri üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Denemeler, Doğu Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü arazilerinde, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre dört tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. Buğday denemesinde; kontrol (gübresiz), geleneksel-DAP (15 kg/da) + Üre (29 kg/da), DAP (15 kg/da) + Nutrisphere-N-Üre (15 kg/da) ve DAP (15 kg/da) +Nutrisphere-N-Üre (29 kg/da) olmak üzere 4 konu çalışılmıştır. Mısır denemesinde ise; 25 kg DAP/da+üst gübresiz; 25 kg DAP/da + 60 kg Üre/da ve 25 kg DAP/da+60 kg NutrisphereN-Üre/da konuları araştırmaya konu olmuştur. Alınan gözlemler ve yapılan varyans analizleri sonucunda, klasik üst gübre (Üre) uygulamasına karşın “Nutrisphere-N-Üre” kullanımının buğdayda incelenen tüm verim ve verim kriterleri üzerine etkisi istatistiki açıdan önemli bulunmuştur. Geleneksel uygulamada dekara verim 326,88 kg olurken Nutrisphere-N (15 kg/da)’nin kullanıldığı konuda dekara verim 388,46 kg olarak tespit edilmiştir. Mısır denemesinde; “Nutrisphere-N-Üre” kullanımının kontrol konusuna göre bitki boyu, ilk koçan yüksekliği ve hektolitre ağırlığı üzerine etkisi istatistiki olarak önemsiz bulunurken sap çapı ve verim değerleri üzerinde ise istatistiki olarak önemli farklılıklara neden olduğu görülmüştür. En yüksek verim (1774,31 kg/da) ile yüksek ham protein (%8,95) ve bunun yanında düşük nişasta oranı (%67,73) “25 kg DAP/da+60 kg NutrisphereN-Üre/da” uygulamasından elde edilmiştir.

The Effects of Using Urea with Nitrogen Stabilizer as Top Fertilizer on Some Yield and Quality Criteria in Bread Wheat and Corn

In this study; The effects of using urea as top fertilizer and “Nutrisphere-N-Urea” fertilizer, which is a nitrogen stabilizer, on some yield and quality criteria of bread wheat and corn were investigated. Experiments were carried out in the fields of the Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute according to a randomized block design with four replications. In the wheat trial; control (no fertilizer), conventional-DAP (15 kg/da)+Urea (29 kg/da), DAP (15 kg/da)+Nutrisphere-N-Urea (15 kg/da) and DAP (15 kg/da)+Nutrisphere-N-Urea (29 kg/da) subjects including were studied. In the corn trial; 25 kg DAP/da+without top fertilizer; 25 kg DAP/da+60 kg Urea/da and 25 kg DAP/da+60 kg Nutrisphere-N-Urea/da were the subject of the research. As a result of the observations and analysis of variance, the effect of the use of “Nutrisphere-N-Urea” on yield and yield criteria in wheat, despite the classical top fertilizer (Urea) application, was found to be statistically significant. While the yield per decare was 326.88 kg in the traditional application, it was found to be 388.46 kg when Nutrisphere-N-Urea (15 kg/da) was used. In the corn trial; While the effect of the use of “NutrisphereN-Urea” on plant height, first ear height and hectoliter weight was found to be statistically insignificant compared to the control subject, it was seen that it caused statistically significant differences on stem diameter and yield values. The highest yield (1774.31 kg/da) and crude protein (8.95%) and low starch ratio (67.73%) were obtained from the “25 kg DAP/da+60 kg NutrisphereN-Urea/da” application

___

  • Alam SM, Azam S, Ali S, Iqbal M. 2003. Wheat yield and P fertilizer efficiency as influenced by rate and integrated use of chemical and organic fertilizers. Pak. J. Soil Sci. 22(2):72-76.
  • Allison LE, Moodie CD. 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9:13791400. Am. Soc. Of Agron. Inc. Madison. Wisconsin. U.S.A.
  • Anonim 2019. World Agricultural Production. United States Department of Agriculture, Circular Series, WAP 8-19 August 2019.
  • Atak M, Kaya M, Çiftçi CY. 2005. Kızıltan-91 makarnalık buğday çeşidinde farklı azotlu gübreler ile uygulama şekillerinin verim ve bazı verim özelliklerine etkileri. Türkiye VI. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, Antalya. 5-9 Eylül 2005, Cilt I: 121-126s.
  • Barlog P, Grzebisz W. 2004. Effect of timing and nitrogen fertilizer application on winter oilseed rape, II. Nitrogen uptake dynamics and fertilizer efficiency. J Agron Crop Sci. 190:314- 323.
  • Blagoveshchenskaya G, Burlakova G, L Yu, Zavalin AA, Zyabkina GA, Merzlaya GE, Dyshko VI. 2005. Stability of Agrocenoses during Long-Term Use of Organic and Mineral Fertilizers, Russian Agricultural Sciences Journal, 12, 14–17.
  • Blanco M. 2011. Supply of and access to key nutrients NPK for fertilizers for feeding the world in 2050. UPM, Madrit.
  • Bouyoucous GD. 1951. A recablibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanic analysis of the soil. Agronomy Journal 43:434-438.
  • Brentrup F, Palliere B. 2011. “Nitrogen use efficiency as an agroenvironmental indicator”, Yara International Research Centre.
  • Cahill S, Osmond D, Weisz R, Heiniger R. 2010. Evaluation of alternative nitrogen fertilizers for corn and winter wheat production. Agron J, 102: 12261236. doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0095
  • Carson PL. 1980. Recommended potassium test. P. 20-21. In: Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Central REgion. Rev. Ed. North Central. Regional Publicaton no. 221. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. North Dakota State University, FArgo USA.
  • Chien SH, Edmeades D, McBride R, Sahrawat KL. 2014. Review of maleic–itaconic acid copolymer purported as urease inhibitor and phosphorus enhancer in soils. Agron J, 106: 423– 430
  • Coppola E, Nuzzo S, Liccardo G. 2006. Organo-Mineral Fertigation in Campania: Effects on TheGross Salable Production of Lettuce and Aubergine, Informatore Agrario Journal, 62(25): 42–44.
  • Dobermann A, Cassman KG. 2005. Cereal area and nitrogen use efficiency are drivers of future nitrogen fertilizer consumption. Sci. China Ser. 48:745758.
  • Durmaz AH, Öner N. 2018. Yavaş Ayrışan Gübre ve Yaprak Gübresi Uygulamasının Ayçiçeği Bitkisinin Verim ve Yağ Kalitesi Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 15: 17-19.
  • Eickhout B, Bouwman AF, Van Zeijts H. 2006. The role of nitrogen in world food production and environmental sustainability. Agr. Ecosystems and Environ. 116:4-14.
  • Ernanı PR. 2003. Disponibilidade de nitrogênio e adubação nitrogenada para macieira. Lages: Graphel, 2003. 76p)
  • Ev O. 2006. Konya Koşullarında Bazı Ekmeklik ve Makarnalık Buğday Çeşitlerinde Azotlu Gübrelerin Verim ve Kalite Üzerine Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tekirdağ, 114 s.
  • Eyüpoğlu F. 2002. Türkiye gübre gereksinimi, tüketimi ve geleceği. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü İşletme Müdürlüğü Yayınları, No: 2, Ankara.
  • Franzen D, Goos RJ, Norman RJ, Walker TW, Roberts T, Slaton NA, Lukach J. 2011. Field and laboratory studies comparing nutrisphere-nitrogen urea with urea in North Dakota, Arkansas, and Mississippi. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34(8): 1198-1222.
  • Gerendas J, Abbadi J, Sattelmacher B. 2008. Potassium efficiency of safflower and sunflower. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171:431-439.
  • Gökmen F, Zengin M, Gezgin S, Arısoy RZ, Çakmak İ, Taner S. 2008. Amonyum Nitrat ve Entec Gübrelerinin Çinkosuz ve Çinkolu Bloklarda Yetiştirilen Makarnalık Buğdayın Verim ve Verim Unsurlarına Etkileri. Ülkesel Tahıl Sempozyumu, 2-5 Haziran.
  • Gordon WB. 2008. Nitrogen management for notillage corn and grain sorghum production. International Plant Nutrient Institute.
  • Gordon WB. 2014. Management of urea-containing fertilizers for no-tillage corn using nitrogen stabilizers and coated-granule technology. J. Plant Nutr. 37: 87–94.
  • Gyaneshwar P, Kumar GN, Parekh LJ, Poole PS. 2002. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil, 245:83-93.
  • Harty MA, McGeough KL, Carolan R, Müller C, Laughlin RJ, Lanigan GJ, Watson CJ. 2017. Gross nitrogen transformations in grassland soil react differently to urea stabilisers under laboratory and field conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 109: 23-34.
  • Hendrickson LL. 1992. Corn yield response to the urease inhibitor NBPT: five-year summary. J. Prod. Agric. 5: 131–137. Hubbard RK, Sheridan JM, Lowrance R, Bosch DD, Vellidis GEORGE. 2004. Fate of nitrogen from agriculture in the southeastern Coastal Plain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 59(2): 72-86.
  • Hunter Frame W, Alley MM, Thomason W, Whitehurst G, Whitehurst B, Campbell R. 2013. Agronomic Evaluation of Coated Urea to Reduce Ammonia Volatilization from Side‐ dress Applications to Corn. Crop Management, 12(1): 1-13.
  • Ibrikci H, Cetin M, Karnez E, Kirda C, Topcu S, Ryan J, Oztekin E, Dingil M, Korkmaz K, Oguz H. 2012. Spatial and temporal variability of groundwater nitrate concentrations in irrigated Mediterranean agriculture. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43: 47–59.
  • İpek VA, Çokuysal B. 2018. NBPT kaplamalı ürenin buğday ve mısırda etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak.
  • Derg., 2018, 55(4):407-412. doi: 10.20289/zfdergi.413711 Jackson ML. 1959. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey.
  • Karaman MR, Brohi AR, Müftüoğlu NM, Öztaş T, Zengin M. 2007. Sürdürülebilir Toprak Verimliliği. ISBN: 978-975- 8629-49-7, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Karaman MR, Turan M. 2012. Bitki Beslemede Sürdürülebilir Yönetim Stratejisi ve Gübre Etkinlik Parametreleri, Toprak Su Dergisi, 2012; 1(1): 15-21.
  • Karaşahin M. 2014. The effects of different irrigation methods and plant densities on nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency in silage corn production, Crop Research-Hisar. 47(1,2 and 3): 3339.
  • Kaur G, Zurweller BA, Nelson KA, Motavalli PP, Dudenhoeffer CJ. 2017. Soil waterlogging and nitrogen fertilizer management effects on corn and soybean yields. Agron. J. 109: 97–106.
  • Kissel DE, Cabrera ML, Paramasivam S. 2008. Ammonium, ammonia and urea reactions in soils. p. 101-156. In Nitrogen in Agricultural Systems. Agronomy Monograph No. 49. JS. Schepers and WR. Raun, eds. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madision, WI.
  • Korkmaz K, Ibrikci H, Karnez E, Buyuk G, Ryan J, Ulger AC, Oguz H. 2009. Phosphorus use efficiency of wheat genotypes grown in calcareous soils, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32:12: 2094-2106,
  • Korkmaz K, Ibrikci H, Ryan J, Buyuk G, Guzel N, Karnez E, Yagbasanlar T. 2008. Optimizing nitrojen fertilizer–use recommendations for winter wheat in a mediterranean-type environment using tissue nitrate testing. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39: 1352-1366.
  • Liao Z. 1989. A New Organic-Inorganic Fertilizer Made from Industrial Wastes, Proceedings of Fertilizer Asia Conference and Exhibition, Philippines, pp: 253–257
  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc. iron. manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42:421-428.
  • Ma J, Li XL, Xu H, Han Y, Cai ZC, Yagi K. 2007. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and wheat straw application on CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy rice field. Australian J. of Soil Research, 45:359-367.
  • Man JG, Zhou J, Wang D, Yu ZW, Zhang M, Hu ZY, Hou XT. 2011. Effects of sulfur plus resin-coated controlled release urea fertilizer on winter wheat dry matter accumulation and allocation and grain yield. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology, 22(5): 1175-1182.
  • Martins MR, Sant’Anna SAC, Zaman M, Santos RC, Monteiro RC, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S. 2017. Strategies for the use of urease and nitrification inhibitors with urea: Impact on N2O and NH3 emissions, fertilizer-15N recovery and maize yield in a tropical soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 247: 54-62.
  • Moro SK, Sullivan DM, Horneck DA. 2017. Ammonia volatilization from broadcast urea and alternative dry nitrogen fertilizers. Soil Sci. Soc Am. J. 81: 1629–1639.
  • Mukherjee A, Sinha I, Das R. 2015. Application of Nanotechnology in Agriculture: Future Prospects. Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers (OYCE) Conference, March 13-14, DJ Sanghvi College of Engineering, Mumbai, India.
  • Muurinen S. 2007. Nitrogen dynamics and nitrogen use efficiency of spring cereals under Finnish growing conditions. Yliopistopaino, 29: 1-38. http://urn.fi/URN: ISBN:978-952-10-3465-7.
  • Ni BL, Liu MZ, Lu SY, Xie LHYF, Wang YF. 2011. Environmentally friendly slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. J. Agric. Food Chem., 59: 1016910175. doi: 10.1021/jf202131z
  • Ni BL, Liu MZ, Lu SY. 2009. Multifunctional slow-release urea fertilizer from ethylcellulose and superabsorbent coated formulations. Chem. Eng. J, 155: 892-898. doi: 10.1016/j.cej. 2009.08.025
  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 939. U.S. Cov. Print Office. Washington D.C.
  • Pawel W. 2014. Evaluatıon Of Nıtrogen Applıcatıon Methods And Rates Wıth Nutrısphere-N On Corn In Southeastern Coastal Plaıns. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 (1): 109-118, 2014
  • Richards JE, Daigle JY, LeBlanc P, Paulin R, Ghanem I. 1993. Nitrogen Availability and Nitrate Leaching from Organomineral Fertilizers, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 73(2): 197–208.
  • Shaviv A. 2005. Environmental friendly nitrogen fertilization. Sci. China Series C-Life Sci., 48: 937947. doi: 10.1360/ 062005-285.
  • Silva AGB, Sequeira CH, Sermarini RA, Otto R. 2017. Urease inhibitor NBPT on ammonia volatilization and crop productivity: A meta-analysis. Agron. J. 109: 1–13.
  • Stagnari F, Pisante M. 2012. Slow release and conventional N fertilizers for nutrition of bell pepper. Plant Soil Environ., 58: 268-274.
  • Tian Z, Wang JJ, Liu S, Zhang Z, Dodla SK, Myers G. 2015. Application effects of coated urea and urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical cotton field of the Mississippi delta region. Science of the Total Environment, 533: 329-338.
  • US Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and İmprovement of. Saline and Alkaline Soils (Ed L. A. Richards). USDA Agriculture Handbook B. No: 60. U. S. Gov. Printing Office. Washington. 160 P.
  • Yılmaz N, Şimşek S. 2012. Sivas ekolojik koşullarında ekmeklik buğdayda (Triticum aestivum L.) üst gübrelemede kullanılacak azotlu gübre form ve miktarının belirlenmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 1: 91-96
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)