Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy in Three fraction Single-isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases
Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy in Three fraction Single-isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to compare single-isocenter volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) techniques in patients who received multifraction stereo tactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases. METHODS Twenty-one patients who were treated with a radiation dose of 27 Gy in three fractions were replanned. Both VMAT and DCAT plans with single isocenter were obtained for each patient. Plan quality indices, cumulative monitor unit (MU) values, maximum dose for organs at risk, and mean dose, V19.6Gy, and V23.1Gy for healthy brain tissue were compared. RESULTS The conformity index (p=0.0002), gradient index (p=0.003), maximum dose for brainstem (p=0.016) and mean dose (p=0.00007), V19.6Gy (p=0.00006), and V23.1Gy (p=0.00006) values for healthy brain tissue were significantly superior in the VMAT technique, compared to DCAT technique. In addition, a trend toward significance for achieving lower maximum dose value to the optic nerves and/or path way was observed with VMAT (p=0.073). DCAT provided significantly lower MU values (3097.44 vs. 1479.09; p=0.00006). CONCLUSION VMAT was able to provide better target conformity and lower risk of brain radionecrosis at least dosi metrically in multifraction SRS for patients with multiple brain metastases. DCAT may be chosen in patients with relatively poor performance status or low tolerance to long-lasting radiotherapy sessions.
___
- 1. Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T, Akabane A, Higuchi Y, Kawagishi J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pa tients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): A multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(4):387–95.
- 2. Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, Baumert B, Combs SE, Kin hult S, Kros JM, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases from solid tumors: Guidelines from the european association of neuro-oncology (EANO). Neuro Oncol 2017;19(2):162–74.
- 3. Yamamoto M, Kawabe T, Sato Y, Higuchi Y, Nariai T, Watanabe S, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: A case matched study comparing treatment results for pa tients with 2-9 versus 10 or more tumors. J Neuro surg 2014;121:16–25.
- 4. Blonigen BJ, Steinmetz RD, Levin L, Lamba MA, War nick RE, Breneman JC. Irradiated volume as a pre dictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77(4):996–1001.
- 5. Minniti G, Clarke E, Lanzetta G, Osti MF, Trasimeni G, Bozzao A, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Analysis of outcome and risk of brain ra dionecrosis. Radiat Oncol 2011;6:48.
- 6. Putz F, Weissmann T, Oft D, Schmidt MA, Roesch J, Si avooshhaghighi H, et al. FSRT vs. SRS in brain metas tases-differences in local control and radiation necro sis-a volumetric study. Front Oncol 2020;10:559193.
- 7. Remick JS, Kowalski E, Khairnar R, Sun K, Morse E, Cherng HR, et al. A multi-center analysis of single fraction versus hypofractionated stereotactic radio surgery for the treatment of brain metastasis. Radiat Oncol 2020;15(1):128.
- 8. Milano MT, Grimm J, Niemierko A, Soltys SG, Moiseenko V, Redmond KJ, et al. Single-and multi fraction stereotactic radiosurgery dose/volume tol erances of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;110:68–86.
- 9. Hofmaier J, Bodensohn R, Garny S, Hadi I, Fleis chmann DF, Eder M, et al. Single isocenter stereo tactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: Dosimetric comparison of VMAT and a dedicated DCAT planning tool. Radiat Oncol 2019;14(1):103.
- 10.Moon YM, Jeon W, Yu T, Bae SI, Kim JY, Kang JK, et al. Which is better for liver SBRT: Dosimetric compari son between DCAT and VMAT for liver tumors. Front Oncol 2020;10:1170.
- 11.Clements M, Schupp N, Tattersall M, Brown A, Larson R. Monaco treatment planning system tools and opti mization processes. Med Dosim 2018;43(2):106–17.
- 12.Bodensohn R, Kaempfel AL, Fleischmann DF, Hadi I, Hofmaier J, Garny S, et al. Simultaneous stereotac tic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy: A prospective monocentric registry trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2021;197(7):601–13.
- 13.Eekers DB, In’t Ven L, Roelofs E, Postma A, Alapetite C, Burnet NG, et al. The EPTN consensus-based atlas for CT-and MR-based contouring in neuro-oncology. Radiother Oncol 2018;128(1):37–43.
- 14.Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hin son W, Kavanagh B, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM task group 101. Med Phys 2010;37(8):4078-101.
- 15.Paddick I, Lippitz B. A simple dose gradient measure ment tool to complement the conformity index. J Neu rosurg 2006;105:194–201.
- 16.Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, Souhami L, Hirschfeld A, Dinapoli R, et al. Radiation therapy oncology group: Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27(5):1231–9.
- 17.Audet C, Poffenbarger BA, Chang P, Jackson PS, Lun dahl RE, Ryu SI, et al. Evaluation of volumetric modu lated arc therapy for cranial radiosurgery using multi ple noncoplanar arcs. Med Phys 2011;38(11):5863–72.
- 18.Molinier J, Kerr C, Simeon S, Ailleres N, Charissoux M, Azria D, et al. Comparison of volumetric-modu lated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc treat ment planning for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016;17(1):92–101.
- 19.Salkeld AL, Unicomb K, Hayden AJ, van Tilburg K, Yau S, Tiver K. Dosimetric comparison of volu metric modulated arc therapy and linear accelera tor-based radiosurgery for the treatment of one to four brain metastases. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014;58(6):722–8.
- 20.Huang C, Ren L, Kirkpatrick J, Wang Z. SU-E-T-645: Treatment of multiple brain metastases using stereo tactic radiosurgery with single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy: Comparison with conven tional dynamic conformal arc and static beam stereo tactic radiosurgery. Med Phys 2012;39(20):3854.
- 21.Badkul RK, Jiang H, Saleh H, Chen AM, Wang F. Dosi metric evaluation of automated single-isocenteric vs. conventional multi-isocenteric SRS technique using dynamic conformal arcs for the treatment of mul tiple brain metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018;102(3):e506–7.