___

• Arıoğlu, H.H. 1988. Yerfıstığı Yetiştirme ve Islahı, Bitkisel özellikler. TAB-354 Yağ Bitkileri Cilt I. Soya ve Yerfıstığı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Ders kitabı. No. 35. s. 67-74
• Bell, M.J. and G. Harch, 1999. Effects of photoperiod on reproductive development of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a cool subtropical environment. I. Field studies, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42:1133-1149
• Challinor, A.J., J.M. Slingo, T.R. Wheeler, P.Q. Craufurd, and D.I.F. Grines, 2003. Towards a combined seasonal whether and crop productivity forecasting systems; determination of the spatial correlation scale. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 42:175-192
• Divekar, C.B. 1963. Flowering in groundnut varieties, Indian Oil Seeds. Mysere States.
• Frimpong, A. 2004. Characterization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Northern Gana. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 7(5):838-842
• Gadgil, S., P.R. Seshagiri Rao and K.R. Narahari Rao, 2002. Use of climate information for farm-level decision making; rainfed groundnut in Southern India, Agricultural Systems. 74 (3):431-458
• Gupton, C.L. and D.A. Emery, 1970. Heritability estimates of the maturity of fruit from specific growth periods in Virginia type peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Science. 10:127- 129
• Holbrook, C.C. and H.T. Stalker, 2003. Peanut breeding and genetic resources, Plant Breeding Reviews. Edited by Jules Janick, ISBN 0-471- 21541-4, John Wiley&Song Inc. 22:297-356
• Khalfaoui, J.L. 1990. Study of precocity components in groundnut. Ole’agineux. 45:81-87
• Meinke, H. and G.L. Hammer, 1997. Forecasting regional crop production using SOI phases: on example for the Australian peanut industry. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 48: 789-793
• Mortley, D.G., C.K. Bonsi, P.A. Loreton, W.A. Hill and C.E. Morris, 2000. High relative humidity increases yield, harvest index, flowering, and gynophore growth of hydroponically grown peanut plants. HortScience. 35:46-54
• Önemli, F. 1990. Bazı yerfıstığı çeşitlerinin tarımsal özellikleri üzerinde araştırmalar. Yüksek lisans tezi. Trakya Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 28p.
• Önemli, F. 1995. Döl kontrollü teksel seleksiyon metodu ile erkenci yerfıstığı çeşitlerinin geliştirilmesi. Doktora tezi. Trakya Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 134p.
• Pattee, H.E. and C.T. Young, 1982. Peanut Science and Technology. American Peanut Research and Education Society Inc. Yoakum. Texas. USA. 825p.
• Reddy, T.Y., V.R. Reddy and V. Anbumozhi, 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drough stress and its amelioration; a critical review, 41:75-88
• Rao, N.V., P. Singh, D. Balaguravaiah and J.P. Dimes, 2004. Systems modelling and farmer’s participatory evaluation of cropping options to diversify peanut systems in Anontapur region, India. I: APSIM simulations to analyze constraints and opportunities. 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, September, 2004.
• Sanders, T.H., E.J. Williams, A.M. Schubert and H.E. Pattee, 1980. Peanut maturity method evaluations. T. Southeas. Peanut Science. 7:78- 82
• Vara Prasad, P.V., P.Q. Craufurd and R.J. Summerfield, 1999. Sensitivity of peanut to timing of heat stress during reproductive Winterer, J. and A.E. Weiss, 2004. Stress induced development. Crop Science. 39: 1352-1357
• Vara Prasad, P.V., P.Q. Craufurd, V.G. Kakani, T.R. Wheeler and K.J. Boote, 2000. Influence of high temperature during pre- and post-anthesis stages of floral development on fruit set and pollen germination in peanut. Journal of Plant
• Physiology. 28(3):233-240
• assortative mating and evaluation of stress
• resistance, 7(9):785-793