Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analiz Yöntemi

Bu çalışma tasarım aktivitesi ile ilgili yapılan araştırmalarda son dönemlerde en çok kullanılan yöntem olan protokol analizi yöntemi ile ilgili literatür çalışmasını içermektedir. Tasarım düşüncesini araştırmak ve değerlendirmek için ortaya konulan bu yöntemle ilgili yaklaşım ve analiz yöntemleri incelenmiş, araştırmalar sonucunda tasarım çalışmaları için kullanılabilecek nitelikte bulunan Suwa ve ark. (1998) ile Suwa & Tversky (1997)ye ait çalışmalar değerlendirilerek örnek oluşturabilecek bir kodlama ve protokol yöntemi derlenmiştir. Yapılan araştırmalar ışığında literatürde bu yöntem ve yaklaşımla tasarım araştırmalarında geliştirilmiş deneysel çalışmalara da yer verilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın tasarım düşüncelerini ölçmekle ilgili yapılacak akademik araştırmalar için bir kaynak ve yol gösterici olacağı düşünülmektedir.

RESEARCH ON DESIGN ACTIVITIES: PROTOCOL ANALYZE METHOD

This paper presents the result of a comprehensive literature review on protocol analyze method that recently utilizing in design protocol studies. Approaches and evaluation about protocol analyze which is used for analyzing and evaluating design thinking process, have investigated. As a result of literature review studies, researchs of Suwa et al. (1998) and Suwa & Tversky ( 1997 ) found useful for compiling comprehensive coding schema and segmentation. Furthermore, experimental studies on protocol analysis method have investigated and compiled. This study is supposed to be a guide and source for an experimental study focused on the design protocol studies.

___

Ahmed, S., Wallace K.M., Blessing, L.T. (2003), Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1-11.

Akın, Ö., Akın, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamination (A-h-a!). Design Studies, 17(4), 341-361

Akın Ö., Lin C (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236.

Atman, C.J, Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152.

Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing: An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32-74.

Christiaans H., Dorst C. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial Design Engineering: a protocol study, Design Theory and Methodology - DTM 92 , D.L. Taylor ve D. A. Stauffer (Editörler), Amer Society of Mechanical, New York.

Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. (1990). A Methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25(3), 365-381.

Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-90.

Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J., (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity . Design Studies, 16(2), 261-274.

Dorst, K. (1995). Analyzing Design Activity: new direction in protocol analyze. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.

Dorst, K., Cross, N., (2001). Creativity in the design process: coevolution of problemsolution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.

Eckersley, M. (1988). The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies, 9(2), 86-94.

Gero, J. S., Tang, H. (2001). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22(3), 283-295.

Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143.

Göker, M. H. (1997). The Effects of Experience During Design Problem Solving. Design Studies, 18(4), 405-426.

Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design procees: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.

Kavaklı M., Scrivener S., Ball, L.J. (1999). Structure in Idea Sketching Behavior. Design Studies, 19(4), 485-517.

Kavaklı, M., Gero J.S. ( 2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22(4), 347-364.

Kintsch, W., Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274.

Lundberg, G. (1984). Protocol Analysis and Spatial Behavior. Human Geography, 66(2), 91-97.

Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259. Mandler, M., Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151.

Mc Neill, T., Gero J., Warren, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. 10(3), 129-140.

Önal Ketizmen, G. (2010). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Öğrenciye Ait Kültürel Şemanın Tasarım Sürecindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Stauffer, L.A. , Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental process of mechanical designers based on emprical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.

Suwa, M. ,Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, 18(4), 385-403.

Suwa, M. , Purcell, T., Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455483.

Tang, J.C., Leifer, L.J. (1991). An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design, 2(4), 209-219.

Valkenburg, R. , Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.

Wagner ,D.A, Scurrah M.J., Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 1971:454-478.

Yao, S. (2007). Experimental Approaches for Understanding Conceptual Design Activities, Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCanada: Concordia University, USA.

Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2006, 24-26 July). A new approach for protocol analysis on design activities using axiomatic theory of design modeling. 3rd CDEN/RCCI International Design Conference , Toronto, Canada.

Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2007). Preliminary Study of Cognitive Model of Designer's Creativity by Using Formal Protocol Analysis. F.L.Krause (Editör). The Future of Prodcut Development: : Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Springer -Verlag Berlin, s. 165-174. Internet Kaynakları:

Internet: Cross, N. (1996). Design Cognition: Results From Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity, Knowing and Learning to Design, Web:http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY2013/cs7601_spring/p apers/Cross-DesignCognition.pdf adresinden 12 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.

Internet: Jiang, H. ,Yen, C. (2010). Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review, Web:https://www.academia.edu/5038270/Protocol_Analysis_in_ Design_Research_a_review adresinden 3 Mayıs 2014'de alınmıştır.

Internet: Engineering Design Center, Improving the Design Process, Web: https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/ 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır. Internet: Design Lab, Environment Based Design, Web:http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~design/index.html 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.

Internet: Stanford University, Center for Design Research, Web :http://me.stanford.edu/research/labs-and-centers/center-designresearch 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.

Internet: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition,

Web:http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/1309186?c=people 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.