Aladdin HW2.0 Optik Düşük Koherens İnterferometre ile Oküler Biyometri ve Pupillometrinin Yeniden Üretilebilirliği

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı kataraktlı hastalarda ve sağlıklı bireylerde Aladdin HW2.0 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) ile oküler biyometri ve pupillometrinin yeniden üretilebilirliğini değerlendirmekti.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Biyometri, interferometri, optik cihazlar, pupillometri

Reproducibility of Ocular Biometry and Pupillometry with the Aladdin HW2.0 Optical Low-Coherence Interferometer

Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the reproducibility of ocular biometry and pupillometry with the Aladdin HW2.0 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) in patients with cataracts and healthy subjects.

Keywords:

Biometry, interferometry, optical devices, pupillometry,

PDF

___

Turczynowska M, Koźlik-Nowakowska K, Gaca-Wysocka M, Grzybowski A. Effective ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Eur Ophthalmic Rev. 2016;10(2):94–100. doi:10.17925/EOR.2016.10.02.94
Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. J Cataract and Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2233-2241. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.062
Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Barboni P, et al. Correction: Accuracy of optical biometry combined with placido disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0175145. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175145
Mandal P, Berrow EJ, Naroo SA, et al. Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer. B J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(2):256-258. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304002
Optical biometry & topography system Aladdin series. Available at:http://www.topcon.com.hr/pdf/topcon-aladdin-brochure-EN.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2015.
Kaya F, Kocak I, Aydin A, Baybora H, Karabela Y. Comparison of different formulas for intraocular lens power calculation using a new optical biometer. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2015;38(8):717-722. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2015.03.006
Garza-Leon M, Fuentes-de la Fuente HA, García-Treviño AV. Comparison of ocular biometry using the new SC-OCT-based optical biometer and OLCI in patients with clear lens. Vis. Pan-Am. 2016;15(3):75-79.
McAlinden C, Gao R, Yu A, et al. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar. B J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(9):1223-1229. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309365
Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):62-67. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.041
Sabatino F, Findl O, Maurino V. Comparative analysis of optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(5):685-693. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.051
Tang M, Chen A, Li Y, Huang D. Corneal power measurement with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2115-2122. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.018
Dharwadkar S, Nayak B K. Corneal topography and tomography. J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2015;3(1):45-62. doi:10.4103/2320-3897.149379
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
Currie LA. and Svehla G. Nomenclature for the presentation of results of chemical analysis (IUPAC Recommendations 1994). Pure Appl. Chem. 1994;66:595-608. doi:10.1351/pac199466030595
Milka M, Wylegala E, Nowinska A, Janiszewska D, Weglarz B. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using IOL Master and ALADDIN systems. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:S252. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2013.4451.x
Sorkin N, Rosenblatt A, Barequet IS. Predictability of biometry in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(12):1545-1551. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000990
Huang Y, Tang X, Deng J. Comparison of biometric measurements of ALADDIN versus IOL Master 500 in cataract patients. J Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;23:21-23.
McAlinden C, Wang Q, Gao R, et al. Axial length measurement failure rates with biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to partial-coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence interferometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;173:64-69. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.019
Ortiz A, Galvis V, Tello A, et al. Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(8):1809-1818. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-1006-z
Ceran BB, Hashas Karatepe AS, Tasindi E. Can we use anterior segment parameters of an optical biometer and a combined topography system interchangeably? Glo-Kat. 2020;15(1)):38-44. doi:10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.8
Kanclerz P, Przewłócka K, Wang X. Inter-device measurement variability of vital data parameters for keratorefractive and cataract refractive surgery. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021;13. doi:10.1177/25158414211045750
Rosen E. The Pupil and refractive surgery. In: Kohnen T, Koch DD, eds. Cataract and refractive surgery. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2005;289-302. doi:10.1007/3-540-26678-X_18
Md-Muziman-Syah MM, Suhaimi MA, Sulaiman UH, et al. Mesopic pupillometry in pre-LASIK patients by a Placido-disc topographer and Hartmann-shack aberrometer. Mal J Med Health Sci. 2021;17(2):197-202.
Espinosa J, Roig AB, Pérez J, Mas D. A high-resolution binocular video-oculography system: assessment of pupillary light reflex and detection of an early incomplete blink and an upward eye movement. Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14(1):1-12. doi:10.1186/s12938-015-0016-6
Kiziltoprak H, Tekin K, Yetkin E, Sekeroglu MA. Static and dynamic pupil characteristics in myopic anisometropic amblyopia. Beyoglu Eye J. 2020;5(2):86-92. doi:10.14744/bej.2020.08760