Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Doğal Seçim, Adaptasyon ve Mutasyon ile İlgili Görüşleri

Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin Evrim konusunun temel dinamiklerinden olan doğal seçilim, adaptasyon ve mutasyon konuları hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmaya 78 Biyoloji Bölümü ve 77 Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği öğrencisi katılmıştır. Öğrencilerin görüşlerinin saptanması için 6 maddeden oluşan çoktan seçmeli bir test (two-tier) kullanılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre üniversite öğrencilerinin doğal seçilim, adaptasyon ve mutasyon konularındaki bilimsel bilgilerinin eksik olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu konulara yönelik yanıtlar, öğrencilerin Lamark’ın evrim görüşü ve Darwin’in evrim teorisi hakkında karmaşık fikirlere sahip olduklarını göstermiştir. Çalışma evrim konusunun doğru olarak öğretimi ile ilgili önerilerle sonuçlandırılmıştır.

University Students' Conceptions About Natural Selection, Adaptation and Mutation

The purpose of this study is to investigate university students’ understanding of the concept of natural selection, adaptation and mutation. 77 third year Biology students and 78 Science Education students participated in this study. To reveal the students understanding 6 item multiple-choice (two-tier) test was used. Results of responses on the two-tier items showed that many students had a lack of understanding these concepts. Students answers of these subjects represented that students had wrong ideas relating to Lamarckian evolution and Darwin’s theory. We concluded this study with suggestions that correct teaching of these subjects.

___

  • Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M. & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (10), 952-78.
  • Bishop, B. A. & Anderson, C. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
  • Blackwell, W. H., Powell,M.J. & Dukes,G.H (2003). The problem of student acceptance of evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 58-67.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bock, W. J. (1980). The definition and recognition of biological adaptation, American Zoology, 20, 217-227.
  • Brumby, M. (1979). Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 13, 119-122.
  • Brumby, M. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493-503.
  • Darwin, C. (2003). Türlerin kökeni. (O. Tuncay, Çev.). İstanbul: Gün Yayıncılık.
  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Deadman, J. A. & Kelly, P. J. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics? Journal of Biological Education, 12, 7-15.
  • Demastes, S. S., Good, R.G. & Peebles, P. (1995). Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79, 637-66.
  • Demastes, S. S., Settlage, J. & Good, R.G. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Case of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 535-550.
  • Demirsoy, A. (1994). Kalıtım ve evrim. Ankara: Meteksan.
  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35, 125-129.
  • Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen, (Ed.), Primary science: Taking the plunge. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
  • Freemann, S. & Herron, J. C. (2002). Evrimsel analiz. (B. Çıplak ve ark., Çev.). Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık.
  • Futuyma, D. J. (1986). Evolutionary biology. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
  • Goud, T. (1982). Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. Science, 216, 380-387.
  • Gould, S. J. (2000). Darwin ve sonrası: Doğa tarihi üzerine incelemeler. (C. Temürcü, Çev.). Ankara: Tübitak.
  • Grene, J. R. & Edgard, D. (1990). The logic of university students’ misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 875-885.
  • Klang, T. (1985). Biological Science :A Molecular Approach. Colorado Spring, CO: The Colorado College Press.
  • Larson, A. & Losos, J. B. (1996). Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation. In M.R. Rose & G. V.
  • Lauder, (Eds.), Adaptation (187-220). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
  • Lawrence, G. H. M. (1968). Taxonomy of vascular plants. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Lawson, A.E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • Lewin, R. (2000). Modern insanın kökeni. (N. Özüaydın, Çev.). Ankara: Tübitak.
  • Milton, R. (2003). Son tartışmalar ışığında darwinizm’in mitleri. (İ. Karaklıkaya, Çev.). İstanbul: Gelenek Yayıncılık.
  • Moorehead, A. (1998). Darwin ve beagle serüveni. (N. Arık, Çev.). Ankara: Tübitak.
  • NRC [National Research Council]. (1996). National science education standarts. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • NRC. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
  • Settlage, Jr. J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449-457.
  • Settlage, J. & Odom, A. L. (1995). “Natural selection conceptions assessment: Development of the two-tier test understanding biological change.” Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.
  • Settlage, J. & Jensen, M. (1996). Investigating the Inconsistencies in College Student Reponses to Natural Selection Test Questions. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 1 (1). Retrieved 17.03.2006.from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/euse/settlage.html.
  • Stern, L. (2004). Effective assessment: probing students’ understanding of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 39 (1), 12-17.
  • Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M. P., & Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students’ beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30 (2), 118-125.
  • Taşkın, Ö. (2006). Fen bilgisi eğitiminde özel öğretim yöntemleri (s.30-37). Samsun: Deniz Kültür Yayınevi.
  • Tatlı, A. (1992). Evrim ve yaradılış. Konya: Damla Matbaacılık.
  • Treagust, D.F. & Halsam, F. (1987).Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21 (3), 203-211.
  • Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (2), 159-169.
  • Vermeij, G. J. (1991). When biotas meet-understanding biotic interchange. Science,253: 1099-1103.