COVİD-19 SALGININDA SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARINDA DEPRESYON, ANKSİYETE, STRES, TRAVMA DÜZEYİ VE D TİPİ KİŞİLİK: VAKA - KONTROL ÇALIŞMASI

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı COVİD-19 salgınında sağlık çalışanlarında depresyon, anksiyete, stres, virüs korkusu, travma belirti düzeylerini ve D Tipi kişilik ile ilişkisini değerlendirmektir.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmaya bir Devlet Hastanesi’nde çalışan 50 sağlık çalışanı (22 hemşire, 11 ebe, 4 tıbbi sekreter, 7 sağlık memuru ve 6 doktor) ve kontrol grubu olarak benzer ölçütleri karşılayan, bir özel şirketin müşteri ilişkileri çağrı merkezindeki 89 çalışan dahil edildi. Katılımcılara sosyo-demografik anket formu, Depresyon Anksiyete Stres Ölçeği-21 (DASS-21), D Tipi Kişilik Ölçeği (DKÖ), Olayların Etkisi Gözden Geçirilmiş Formu (OEÖ), Vizüel Analog Skala uygulandı.BULGULAR: Sağlık çalışanı ve kontrol grubu arasında depresyon, anksiyete, stres, travma ve virüs korkusu açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı. Ölçek kesme puanlarına göre sağlık çalışanları grubunda %8 oranında depresyon, %24 oranında anksiyete, %16 oranında stres, %94 oranında travma; kontrol grubunda %20,22 oranında depresyon, %31,46 oranında anksiyete, %22,47 oranında stres, %84,26 oranında travma belirtilerinin olduğu saptandı. D Tipi kişiliği olanlarda olmayanlara göre depresyon, anksiyete, stres ve travma puanları anlamlı olarak daha fazlaydı (sırasıyla p<0,001, p=0,001, p<0,001, p<0,001). Ayrıca D Tipi kişilik puanıyla depresyon, anksiyete, stres, travma arasında ve travma ile depresyon, anksiyete, stres arasında pozitif korelasyon saptandı.SONUÇ: Çalışma sonuçlarımız, hem sağlık çalışanlarında hem de kontrol grubunda belirli düzeyde depresyon, anksiyete, stres ve travma olduğunu, ayrıca D Tipi kişilik özelliklerinin daha yüksek depresyon, anksiyete, stres düzeyi ve travmayla ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir.

DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, STRESS, TRAUMA LEVEL, AND TYPE D PERSONALITY AMONG HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: CASE-CONTROL STUDY

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the depression, anxiety, stress, fear of viruses, trauma symptom levels and their relationship with Type D personality in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 healthcare professionals (22 nurses, 11 midwives, 4 medical secretaries, 7 medical officers and 6 physcians) working at A State Hospital and 89 employees in a customer relations call center of a private company, as the control group, who met similar criteria were included in the study. Socio-demographic questionnaire form, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), Type D Scale (DS14), Impact of Event Scale - Revised Form (IES-R) , and Visual Analogue Scale were applied to the participants.RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the healthcare professionals and the control group in terms of depression, anxiety, stress, trauma and fear of virus. According to the cut-off scores of the scales, in the group of healthcare professionals, 8% had depression, 24% had anxiety, 16% had stress, and 94% had trauma; in the control group, it was found that 20.22% had depression, 31.46% had anxiety, 22.47% suffered from stress, and 84.26% had trauma. In those with Type D personality, depression, anxiety, stress and trauma scores were significantly higher compared to those without Type D personality (p<0.001, p=0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). Also, it was determined that there was a positive correlation between Type D personality score and depression, anxiety, stress and trauma, and between trauma and depression, anxiety, and stress.CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrated that there was a certain level of depression, anxiety, stress and trauma in both healthcare professionals and the control group, and that Type D personality characteristics were associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, stress and trauma.

___

  • 1. Dutheil F, Mondillon L, Navel V. PTSD as the second tsunami of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. Psychol Med. 2021;51(10):1773-4.
  • 2. Torales J, O’Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(4):317-20.
  • 3. Wu KK, Chan SK, Ma TM. Posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). J Trauma Stress. 2005;18(1):39–42.
  • 4. Denollet J. DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(1):89–97.
  • 5. Nydegger R, Nydegger L, Basile F. Post-traumatic stress disorder and coping among career professional firefighters. Am J Health Sci. 2011;2(1):11–20.
  • 6. Miller MW. Personality and the etiology and expression of PTSD: A three‐factor model perspective. Clin Psychol. 2003;10(4):373–93.
  • 7. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335-43.
  • 8. Yılmaz Ö, Boz H, Arslan A. Depresyon Anksiyete Stres Ölçeğinin (Dass 21) Türkçe Kısa Formunun Geçerlilik-Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (FESA). 2017;2(2):78-91.
  • 9. Le TA. Multi-level predictors of psychological problems among methadone maintenance treatment patients in difference types of settings in Vietnam. Subst Abus Treat Prev Policy. 2019;14:39.
  • 10. Alçelik A, Yıldırım O, Canan F, Eroğlu M, Aktaş G, Şavlı H. A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the type D personality construct in Turkish hemodialysis patients. Journal of Mood Disorders. 2012;2(1):1-5.
  • 11. Wilson JP, Keane TM (edited by). Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford Press.1997:399–411.
  • 12. Çorapçıoğlu A, Yargıç İ, Geyran P Kocabaşoğlu N. Olayların Etkisi Ölçeği” (IES-R) Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlilik ve güvenirliği. Yeni Symposium. 2006;44(1):14-22.
  • 13. Creamer M, Bell R, Failla S. Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41:1489–96.
  • 14. Hasson D, Arnetz BB. Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. International Electronic Journal Health Education. 2005;8:178–92.
  • 15. Lenzo V, Quattropani MC, Musetti A, et al. Resilience contributes to low emotional impact of the COVID-19 outbreak among the general population in Italy. Front Psychol. 2020;11:576485.
  • 16. Liu S, Yang LL, Zhang CX, et al. Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):17–18.
  • 17. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, et al. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88: 901–7.
  • 18. Simione L, Gnagnarella C. Differences between health workers and general population in risk perception, behaviors, and psychological distress related to COVID-19 spread in Italy. Front Psychol. 2020;(11):2166.
  • 19. Lee SM, Kang WS, Cho AR, Kim T, Park JK. Psychological impact of the 2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients. Compr Psychiatry. 2018;87:123–7.
  • 20. Chan AO, Huak CY. Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(3):190–6.
  • 21. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.
  • 22. Tekin A, Karadag H, Yayla S. The relationship between burnout symptoms and Type D personality among health care professionals in Turkey. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2017;72(3):173–7.
  • 23. Oginska-Bulik, N. Occupational stress and its consequences in healthcare professionals: the role of type D personality. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2006;19(2):113-22.
  • 24. Tuman TC. (2021). The effect of type D personality on anxiety, depression and fear of COVID-19 disease in healthcare workers. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2021;15:1-8.
  • 25. Marcisz-Dyla E, Dąbek J, Irzyniec T, Marcisz C. Personality Traits, Strategies of Coping with Stress and Psychophysical Wellbeing of Surgical and Non-Surgical Doctors in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1646.
  • 26. Kim YH, Kim SR, Kim YO, Kim JY, Kim HK, Kim HY. Influence of type D personality on job stress and job satisfaction in clinical nurses: the mediating effects of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(4):905–16.
Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-4612
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1999
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

BAŞ VE BOYUN SKUAMÖZ HÜCRELİ KANSERİNDE TÜMÖR VE LENFADENOPATİ BT HİSTOGRAM PARAMETRELERİ İLE TÜMÖR EVRESİ VE HPV DURUMU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Yasin SARIKAYA, Sevtap ARSLAN

AKUT KARIN PATOLOJİLERİ İLE ACİL SERVİSE BAŞVURAN GERİATRİK HASTALARDA PROGNOZU ÖNGÖRMEDE KLİNİK KIRILGANLIK ÖLÇEĞİ'NİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: PROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA

Hatice Şeyma AKÇA, Serdar ÖZDEMİR, Abdullah ALGIN, İbrahim ALTUNOK, Evrim KAR

GLOKOM HASTALARINDA SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAFİ BULGULARI

Azad HEKİMOĞLU, Onur ERGUN, Aysun ŞANAL DOGAN, Şule BERK ERGUN, Mutlu ACAR, Canan GÜRDAL, Baki HEKİMOĞLU

COVİD-19 PANDEMİSİNDE BİR ÜNİVERSİTE HASTANESİNDE DOKTOR VE HEMŞİRELERDE TÜKENMİŞLİK SENDROMU

Cansu KÖSEOĞLU TOKSOY, Gökçe ZEYTİN DEMİRAL, Dr.hayridemirbaş DR.HAYRİ DEMİRBAŞ, Hakan ACAR, Ülkü TÜRK BÖRÜ

ROMATOİD ARTRİTİN KLİNİK TEDAVİSİNDE KULLANILAN DİYET YAKLAŞIMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Merve SARAÇ DENGİZEK, Burcu YEŞİLKAYA

NAZAL CERRAHİLERDE MİNİMAL, DÜŞÜK VE YÜKSEK AKIMLI ANESTEZİNİN VÜCUT SICAKLIĞI VE DOKU OKSİJENLENMESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Gül KESİMAL, Leyla KAZANCIOĞLU, Hizir KAZDAL, Şule BATÇIK, Tolga KOYUNCU

PROFLAKTİK SALPİNGO-OOFOREKTOMİ YAPILAN AİLEVİ MEME VE OVER KANSER SENDROMLU HASTALARDA KLİNİK BULGULAR FARKLI MIDIR ?

Gökşen GÖRGÜLÜ, Muzaffer SANCI

COVİD-19 SALGININDA SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARINDA DEPRESYON, ANKSİYETE, STRES, TRAVMA DÜZEYİ VE D TİPİ KİŞİLİK: VAKA - KONTROL ÇALIŞMASI

Yüksel KIVRAK, Ali İNALTEKİN

SERVİKAL İNTRAEPİTELYAL LEZYONLARDA VE YÜKSEK RİSKLİ HPV TİPLERİNDE SERVİKAL KOLPOSKOPİNİN YERİ

Metin ŞENTÜRK, Vehbi Yavuz TOKGÖZ

TİP 1 TİMPANOPLASTİ SONRASI GECİKMİŞ FASİYAL PARALİZİ

Selçuk KUZU, Çağlar GÜNEBAKAN, Abdulkadir BUCAK, Ömer GÖNEN, Fatmatü TÜRE