LPS and Flagellin-based models for serological screening and confirmation of Salmonella infections in chickens

Salmonella B ve D serogruplarına ait kanatlı salmonellosis’i halk sağlığı yönünden ve kanatlı endüstrisindeki ekonomik kayıplar nedeniyle büyük öneme sahiptir. Kanatlı salmonellozisinin etkin tanısı amacıyla, SE lipopolisakkarid (LPS) ve saflaştırılmış flagellin (Flg) tanı antijenlerine dayalı iki indirekt ELISA modeli geliştirilmesinde ticari Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) ELISA kiti ile değerlendirilmiş toplam 126 tavuk serumu kullanıldı. Optimizasyon sonrası, 154 serum indirekt LPS-ELISA ve 263 serum Flg-ELISA ile test edildi. Ticari LPS-ELISA kiti ile karşılaştırıldığında, indirekt LPS- ve Flg-ELISA’ların anti-Salmonella antikor tespit performansları yüksek ve benzer bulundu. Bununla birlikte, sınırlı sayıda serumun Flg- ve LPS-ELISA’da farklılık gösterdiği belirlendi. Bu uyumsuz serumların SE bakteri lizatı ile reaktif olduğu, buna karşın yalnızca LPS veya Flg antijenini tanıdıkları Western Blot analiziyle gösterildi. Bu çalışmadan, LPS- ve Flg-ELISA’nın eşzamanlı kullanımıyla kanatlılara özgü salmonellozisin flagellalı bakteri kökenli zoonotik Salmonella enfeksiyonlarından ayırıcı tanısının yapılabileceği ve Western blot modellerinin doğrulayıcı serolojik test olarak kullanılabileceği sonucuna varıldı.

Tavuklarda Salmonella enfeksiyonlarının serolojik tanısı ve doğrulanmasına yönelik LPS ve flagelline dayalı modeller

Avian salmonellosis due to Salmonella B and D serogroups has a great importance because of the public health and the economical losses in poultry industry. For accurate diagnosis of avian salmonellosis, a total of 126 chicken sera evaluated with a commercial Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) ELISA kit have been used to develop two indirect ELISA models using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and purified flagellin (Flg) of SE as diagnostic antigens. After optimization, 154 and 263 sera were tested with indirect LPS- and Flg-ELISA, respectively. The performance of both indirect LPS- and Flg-ELISA was found high and similar for detecting anti-Salmonella antibody in comparison with a commercial LPS-ELISA kit. Nevertheless, a limited number of chicken sera were found discordant between Flg- and LPS-ELISAs. Western-blot analyses of the discordant sera demonstrated that they were found reactive with bacterial lysate of SE but only recognized LPS or Flg antigen. It was concluded from this study that the simultaneous use of both LPS- and Flg-ELISAs would allow differential diagnosis of avian specific salmonellosis from zoonotic Salmonella infections due to flagellated bacteria and Western blot models can be used as confirmatory serological test.

___

  • 1.Baay MF, Huis in’t Veld JH: Alternative antigens reduce cross-reactions in an ELISA for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry. J Appl Bacteriol, 74, 243-247, 1993.
  • 2.Williams JE: Observations on Salmonella thompson as poultry pathogen. Avian Pathol, 1, 69-73, 1972.
  • 3.Van Zijderveld FG, Van Zijderveld-Van Bemmel AM, Anakotta J: Comparison of four different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serological diagnosis of Salmonella enteritidis infections in experimentally infected chickens. J Clin Microbiol, 30, 2560-2566, 1992.
  • 4.Mirhosseini SZ, Seidavi AR, Shivazad M, Chamani M, Sadeghi AA, Pourseify R: Detection of Salmonella spp. in gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens by polymerase chain reaction. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15, 965-970, 2009.
  • 5.Timoney JF, Sikora N, Shivaprasad HL, Opitz M: Detection of antibody to Salmonella enteritidis by a g, m flagellin-based ELISA. Vet Rec, 127,168-169, 1990.
  • 6.Chart H, Rowe B, Baskerville A, Humphrey TJ: Serological response of chickens to Salmonella enteritidis infection. Epidemiol Infect, 104, 63-71, 1990.
  • 7.Kim CJ, Nagaraja KV, Pomeroy BS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis infection in chickens. Am J Vet Res, 52,1069-1074, 1991.
  • 8.Barrow PA: ELISA’s and the serological analysis of salmonella infections in poultry: A review. Epidemiol Infect, 109, 361369, 1992.
  • 9.OIE: Salmonellosis. In, Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Chapter 2.9.9, 1267-1283, 2008. Available at: http://www.oie.int/Eng/normes/mmanual/ A_index.htm.
  • 10.Nicholas RAJ, Cullen GA: Development and application of an ELISA for detecting antibodies to Salmonella enteritidis in chicken flocks. Vet Rec, 128, 74-76, 1991.
  • 11.Lee EN, Sunwoo HH, Menninen K, Sim JS: In vitro studies of chicken egg yolk antibody (IgY) against Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium. Poultry Sci, 81, 632-641, 2002.
  • 12.Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London), 227, 680-685, 1970.
  • 13. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: Procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 76, 4350-4354, 1979.
  • 14. Ibrahim GF, Fleet GH, Lyons MJ, Walker RA: Method for the isolation of highly purified Salmonella flagellins. J Clin Microbiol, 22, 1040-1044, 1985.
  • 15. McDonough PL, Jacobson RH, Timoney JF, Mutalib A, Kradel DC, Chang YF, Shin SJ, Lein DH, Trock S, Wheeler K: Interpretations of antibody responses to Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis gm flagellin in poultry flocks are enhanced by a kinetics-based enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 5, 550-555, 1998.
  • 16. Zamora BM, Hartung M, Hildebrandt G: Simplified preparation of a specific S. enteritidis antigen for ELISA and other immunological tecniques. J Vet Med B, 46, 1-7, 1999.
  • 17. Chart H, Cheesbrough JS, Waghorn DJ: The serodiagnosis of infection with Salmonella typhi. J Clin Pathol, 53, 851-853, 2000.
  • 18. Chart H, Cheasty T, de Pinna E, Siorvanes L, Wain J, Alam D, Nizami Q, Zulfiqar B, Threlfall EJ: Serodiagnosis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and S. enterica serovars Paratyphi A, B and C human infections. J Med Microbiol, 56, 1161-1166, 2007.
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Analysis of the effects of inhibitor and activator systems (Smad’s proteins) of TGF-βs on chick neural tube closure

NURCAN UMUR, HAFİZE SEDA VATANSEVER, Ahmet Şükrü UMUR, MAHMUT KEMAL ÖZBİLGİN, Mehmet SELÇUKİ

Investigation of superovulation response in Brown Swiss cows after synchronization using progesterone and oestradiol valerate

Bülent BÜLBÜL, Mesut KIRBAŞ, MEHMET KÖSE, ŞÜKRÜ DURSUN

Kırşehir ili Mucur yöresinde sığırlarda görülen Eimeria türlerinin yaygınlığı

ESİN GÜVEN, AYŞE SERPİL NALBANTOĞLU, ÖMER ORKUN, AYTAÇ AKÇAY, Asiye KOÇAK

İneklerin süt, meme başı derisi ve burun mukozalarından izole edilen stafilokok türlerinin antibiyotik direnç profilleri

NİLGÜN ÜNAL, MURAT YILDIRIM

An investigation on fertility Characteristics of sows and growth performances of piglets bred in A commercial farm

FİLİZ AKDAĞ, Hıdır DEMİR, Sebnem G. COREKCI

Fipronil damlatma çözeltisinin kedi ve köpeklerde pirelere ve köpeklerde kenelere etkisi

Erkut TÜZER, MUSTAFA NECATİ MUZ, ZAHİDE BİLGİN, Süleyman ERÇİN, Recep TINAR

Environmental factors affecting kid mortality in Shami goats

Khaled AL-NAJJAR, Solieman SALHAB, Rabeea AL-MERESTANI, Reiad KASEM, Walid AL-AZZAWI, Mahmoud DAWA, Hussain OMED, MUSTAFA SAATCI

The gross anatomy of larynx, trachae and syrinx in goose (Anser anser domesticus)

BURCU ONUK, REŞİDE MERİH HAZIROĞLU, MURAT KABAK

Effect of vitamin $D_3$ and/or zeolite supplementation to laying hen rations added microbial phytase on some blood indices 2. total cholesterol, 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol and oestradiol-17β levels

AYŞEN ALTINER, Tanay BİLAL, Hüseyin ESECELİ, FERAYE ESEN GÜRSEL

Atık sığır fetüslerinde kampilobakteriozisin patolojik immunohistokimyasal mikrobiyolojik ve gerçek zamanlı PZR ile teşhisi

MEHMET TUZCU, ERTAN ORUÇ, Nevin TUZCU, Atila YOLDAŞ, Akın YIĞIN