Effect of different gonadotropin preparation on ovulatory response and embryo yield in Karayaka ewes

Sunulan çalışmada, Karayaka koyunlarında; oFSH (Ovagen®) ve pFSH (Folltropin®) uygulamalarının, süperovulasyon ve embriyo kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Bu çalışmada toplam 35 baş Karayaka koyunu kullanıldı. Koyunlar rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. Koyunların seksüel siklusları, 14 gün süreyle intravaginal CIDR kullanılarak senkronize edildi. Uygulamanın 12. gününden itibaren, 4 gün süreyle Grup I’e oFSH (GI, n=16), Grup II’ye pFSH (GII, n=19) uygulandı. CIDR çıkartıldıkan 6 gün sonra laparotomik olarak embriyo toplama işlemi ve ovaryum muayenesi yapıldı. Gruplar arasında, korpus luteum, fertilize olmamış oosit, embriyo, dondurulabilecek embriyo sayıları, ovulasyon, fertilizasyon, geri kazanım ve embriyo elde etme oranları arasında istatiksel olarak önemli bir fark bulunmadı. Diğer taraftan; gruplar arasında embriyo kaliteleri karşılaştırıldığında GI’den elde edilen embriyoların kalitesi daha yüksek bulundu (P

Karayaka koyunlarında farklı gonadotropin uygulamalarının embriyo verimleri ve ovulasyon yanıtları üzerine etkileri

In this study, the main goal was to investigate the effect of stimulation with either oFSH (Ovagen®) or pFSH (Folltropin®) on the superovulatory response and embryo quality in Karayaka ewes. Thirty-five ewes were used in this study. The ewes were randomly allocated to two groups. Estrous cycles in ewes were synchronized with the controlled integral drug release dispensers (CIDR®) for 14 days. Starting on day 12 and during 4 consecutive days ewes were treated with oFSH in Group I (GI, n=16) and pFSH in Group II (GII, n=19). Ovarian examination and embryo recoveries were carried out with the aid of laparotomy on day 6 following CIDR withdrawal. There was no significant differences in the number of corpora lutea (CL), unfertilized oocytes (UFOs), total number of embryos (EMBTot), total number of freezable embryos (FEMBTot), ovulation rate (OR), fertilization rate (FR), recovery rate (RR) and embryo recovery rate (ERR) between the groups. On the other hand, embryo quality was better in GI compared to GII (P<0.05). In conclusion, it has been thought that application of oFSH for superovulatory treatment in Karayaka ewes was more effective than pFSH for the quality of embryos.

___

  • 1. FAOSTAT: Total meat produced in Turkey. Food and Agricultural Organization Statistics, 2009. http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/default.aspx#ancor, Accessed: 06.10.2011.
  • 2. Kaymakcı MI, Oğuz C, Un G, Bigen T: Basic characteristics of some Turkish indigenous sheep breeds. Pakistan J Biol Sci 4, 916-919, 2001.
  • 3. Olfaz M, Ocak N, Erener G, Cam MA, Garipoglu AV: Growth, carcass and meat characteristics of Karayaka growing rams fed sugar beet pulp, partially substituting for grass hay as forage. Meat Sci, 70, 7-14, 2005.
  • 4. TURKHAYGEN-I Consortium: In Vitro Conservation and Preliminary Molecular Identification of Some Turkish Domestic Animal Genetic Resources-I, 2011, http://www.turkhaygen.gov.tr/doc/turkhaygenproject_pr_en.pdf, Accessed: 06.10.2011.
  • 5. Gordon I: Embryo Transfer and Associated Techniques in Sheep. In, Gordon I (Ed): Controlled Reproduction in Sheep and Goats. Vol. 2, pp. 280-317, CAB Inter-national, New York, NY. 1997.
  • 6. Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Baird DT, Campbell BK, Cocero MJ, Garcia-Garcia RM, Inskeep EK, Lopez-Sebastian A, McNeilly AS, Santiago-Moreno J, Souza CJH, Veiga-Lopez A: Multiple factors affecting the efficiency of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in sheep and goats. Reprod Fertil Dev, 16, 421-425. 2004.
  • 7. Cognie Y, Baril G: State of the art in sheep-goat embryo transfer, INRA Prod Anim, 15, 199-207, 2002.
  • 8. Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Santiago-Moreno J, Cocero M J, Lopez-Sebastian A: Effects of FSH commercial preparation and follicular status on follicular growth and superovulatory response in Spanish Merino ewes, Theriogenology, 54, 1055-1064, 2000.
  • 9. Taşdemir U, Agaoglu A R, Kaymaz M, Karakaş K: Ovarian response and embryo yield of Angora and Kilis goats given the day 0 protocol for super- ovulation in the non-breeding season. Trop Anim Health Prod, 43 (5): 1035-1038, 2011.
  • 10. Mayorga I, Mara L, Sanna D, Stelletta C, Morgante M, Casu S, Dattena M: Good quality sheep embryos produced by superovulation treatment without the use of progesterone devices, Theriogenology, 75, 1661-1668, 2011.
  • 11. Azawi OI, Al-Mola MKMA: Effect of season and mating system in Awassi ewes superovulated with FSH on fertilization rate and embryo recovery, Iraqi J Vet Sci, 24 (2): 75-79, 2010.
  • 12. Ramon-Ugalde JP, Folch J, Cocero MJ, Piña-Aguilar RE, Alabart JL: Embryo recovery from the oviduct in superovulated ewes: A method to improve MOET systems, Czech J Anim Sci, 53 (4): 145-151, 2008.
  • 13. Thompson JGE, Simpson AC, James RW, Tervit HR: The application of progesterone containing CIRD™ devices to superovulated ewes, Theriogenology, 33 (6): 1297-1304, 1990.
  • 14. Torres S, Sevellec C: Repeated superovulation and surgical recovery of embryos in the ewe. Reprod Nutr Dev, 27, 859-863, 1987.
  • 15. Boland MP, Crosby TF, Gordon I: Ovarian response in ewes following horse anterior pituitary extract and progestagen treatment, Anim Reprod Sci, 6, 119-127, 1983.
  • 16. Dattena M, Vespignani S, Branca A, Gallus M, Ledda S, Naitana S, Cappai P: Superovulatory response and quality of embryos recovered from anestrus ewes after a single injection of porcine FSH dissolved in polyvinylpyrrolidone. Theriogenology, 42, 235-239, 1994.
  • 17. Leoni G, Bogliolo L, Pintus P, Ledda S, Naitana S: Sheep embryos derived from FSH/eCG treatment have a lower in vitro viability after vitrification than those derived from FSH treatment, Reprod Nut Develop, 41, 239-246, 2001.
  • 18. Bettencourt EM, Bettencourt CM, Chagas e Silva J, Ferreira P, Manito CI, Matos CM, Romao RJ, Rocha A: Effect of season and gonadotropin preparation on superovulatory response and embryo quality in Portuguese Black Merinos. Small Rumin Res, 74, 134-139, 2008.
  • 19. Cognie Y, Chupin Y, Saumande J: The effect of modifying the FSH/LH ratio during the superovulatory treatment in ewes. Theriogenology, 25,148,1986.
  • 20. D’Alessandro A, Martemucci G, Colonna MA, Cafueri C, Todeda F: Some affects of adding pLH in defined amounts to purified pFSH to modify FSH/LH ratios during the superovulatory treatment of anoestrus ewes, Anim Reprod Sci, 47, 91-98, 1997.
  • 21. Armstrong DT: Recent advences in superovulation of cattle. Theriogenology, 39, 7-24, 1993.
  • 22. Dixon IE, Hopkins GJ: Superovulation of cattle using porcine pitiuitary gonadotropin preparation (Pluset Serono). In, Pluset Scientific Literature Serono Veterinary, Rome, Italy, 22-23, 1996.
  • 23. Hemming PJ: Hormone therapy and estrus cycle control. In: Comparative Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Lecture 4, 2007, http://art- breedingcenter.com/Articles.php?a=Content/ReproHormones.htm, Accessed: 10.11.2011.
  • 24. Stringfellow DA, Seidel SM (Eds.): Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society, Savoy II, International Embryo Transfer Society, Inc., USA, 1998.
  • 25. Cahill LP, Saumande J, Ravault JP, Blanc M, Thimonier J, Mariana JC, Mauleon P: Hormonal and follicular relationships in ewes of high and low ovulation rates. J Reprod Fertil 62, 141-150, 1981.
  • 26. McNatty KP, Hudson NL, Ball K, Mason A, Simmons MH: Super-ovulation and embryo recovery in goats treated with Ovagen and Folltropin. N Z Vet J, 37, 27-29, 1989.
  • 27. Simonetti L, Forcada F, Rivera OE, Carou N, Alberio RH, Abecia JA, Palacin I: Simplified superovulatory treatments in Corriedale ewes, Anim Reprod Sci, 104 (2-4): 227-237, 2008.
  • 28. Cordeiro MF, Lima-Verde JB, Lopes-Júnior ES, Teixeira DIA, Farias LN, Salles HO, Simplício AA, Rondina D, Freitas VJF: Embryo recovery rate in Santa Inês ewes subjected to successive superovulatory treatments with pFSH, Small Rumin Res, 49, 19-23, 2003.
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Uterine microbiology and histopathology in repeat breeder anatolian water buffaloes: An abattoir study

OKTAY YILMAZ, YAHYA KUYUCUOĞLU, ALPER SEVİMLİ, EBUBEKİR YAZICI, MEHMET UÇAR

Induction of oestrus with single or split ecg administrations in Turkish Van Cats during the non-breeding season

Barış Atalay USLU, FETİH GÜLYÜZ, ÖMER UÇAR

Path analysis for determination of relationships between some body measurements and live weight of german fawn x hair crossbred kids

SONER ÇANKAYA, SAMET HASAN ABACI

Direct role of $α_{2}$-adrenoreceptors in antiulcer effect mechanism of tianeptine in rats

FERİDE KOÇ, Emre KARAKUS, Cennet RAĞBETLİ, Nihal ÇETİN, AKIN KIRBAŞ

Effect of different gonadotropin preparation on ovulatory response and embryo yield in Karayaka ewes

ALİ REHA AĞAOĞLU, MUSTAFA KAYMAZ, ÖZGECAN KORKMAZ AĞAOĞLU, KÜBRA KARAKAŞ ALKAN, İLKNUR PİR YAĞCI, UMUT TAŞDEMİR

Neocallimastix sp. ve orpinomyces sp.’nin enzim üretimleri üzerine karbon kaynaklarının etkisi

Uğur ÇÖMLEKÇİOĞLU, FERİT CAN YAZDIÇ, Sevtap KESER, Bekir Mehmet KELLECİ, Gülay BATTALOĞLU, Emin ÖZKÖSE

Metazoan parasite fauna of conger eel (Conger conger L.) near Gökçeada, Northeasten Aegean Sea, Turkey

Ahmet AKMIRZA

A case of diffuse peritoneal larval mesocestoides corti (syn. m. vogae) cestodiasis in a dog in Turkey

SÜLEYMAN AYPAK, NURAN AYSUL, KEREM URAL, Serap BIRINCIOĞLU, Abidin ATASOY, Onur DERİNCEGÖZ, Tuğrul EPİKMEN, TÜLİN KARAGENÇ

Canonical correlation analysis for estimation of relationships between some traits measured at birth and weaning time in karayaka lambs

YALÇIN TAHTALI, SONER ÇANKAYA, ZAFER ULUTAŞ

Inhibitory effects of different decontamination agents on the levels of listeria monocytogenes in the experimentally ınoculated raw beef samples in the laboratory conditions

MEHMET ELMALI, Hilmi YAMAN, KEMAL KAAN TEKİNŞEN, SÜLEYMAN ÖNER, Erhan ÇEKİN