Yönetim Kurulu Yapısının Sürdürülebilir İnovasyon Yeteneği Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye’de Bir Araştırma

Yoğun rekabet koşulları altında bilgi teknolojisinin sürekli olarak gelişim içerisinde olması ve müşteri taleplerinde ortaya çıkan kısa süreli değişimlere bağlı ürün yaşam döngülerinde meydana gelen kısalmalar, işletmelerin çalışma ortamlarında karmaşıklığa ve belirsizliğe sebebiyet vermektedir. Bu durum, işletmelerin sürdürülebilir inovasyon yeteneklerini ön plana çıkarmakta ve önem arz eder bir konuma getirmektedir. Bu çerçevede çalışmanın amacı, yönetim kurulu yapısının işletmelerin inovasyon yetenekleri üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmektir. Söz konusu amaç doğrultusunda, Borsa İstanbul 100 Endeksi’ nde yer alan şirketlerin 2009 – 2017 yıllarına ait verileri, panel veri analizi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Beck-Katz (1995) tarafından geliştirilen dirençli tahminci kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen regresyon analizi sonucunda; yönetim kurulu cinsiyet çeşitliliğinin ve rol ikiliğinin sürdürülebilir inovasyon yeteneği üzerinde negatif yönde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, yönetim kurulu yabancı üye oranı ve işletme büyüklüğünün sürdürülebilir inovasyon yeteneği üzerinde ise pozitif yönde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür.

The Effect of Board Structure on Sustainable Innovation Capability: A Research on Turkey

The continuous development of information technology under intense competition environment and shortening in the product life cycles based on short-term changes in customer demands lead to complexity and uncertainty in business environments. This situation features the sustainable innovation capabilities of enterprises, highlighting their significance. In this context, the objective of this study is to determine the impact of board structure on the innovation capabilities of businesses. In line with this purpose, the data of the companies included in the Istanbul Stock Exchange 100 Index for the years 2009 – 2017 were examined by panel data analysis method. As a result of regression analysis using the robust estimator developed by Beck-Katz (1995), it was found that gender diversity and role duality in the board of directors had a statistically significant negative impact on sustainable innovation capability. However, it was also observed that the ratio of foreign members in the board of directors and the size of the enterprise had a statistically significant positive impact on sustainable innovation capability.

___

  • Akyos, M. (2005), Ulusal İnovasyon (Yenilikçilik) Sistemi, Ankara, http://www.afcea.org.tr/afceatr/makaleler/100205_Akyos.pdf, E.T.:21.09.2020.
  • Al-kalouti J., V. Kumar, N. Kumar, J. A. Garza-Reyes, A. Upadhyay, J. B. Zwiegelaar (2020), “Investigating Innovation Capability and Organizational Performance in Service Firms”, Strategic Change, 29, 103–113.
  • AlQudah, A. M., M. J. Azzam, M. M. Aleqab, M. Z. Shakhatreh (2019), “The Impact of Board of Directors Characteristics on Banks Performance: Evidence from Jordan”, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(2), 1 – 16.
  • Anagnostopoulou, S. C., M. Levis (2008), “R&D and Performance Persistence: Evidence from the United Kingdom”, The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 293-320.
  • Aramburu, N., J. Sáenz, C. E. Blanco (2015), “Structural Capital, Innovation Capability, and Company Performance in Technology-Based Colombian Firms”, Cuadernos de Gestión, 15(1), 39-60.
  • Aygün, M., S. İç (2010), “Genel Müdürün Aynı Zamanda Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Olması Firma Performansını Etkiler mi?”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 47, 192-201.
  • Azubuike, V. M. U. (2013), “Technological Innovation Capability and Firm’s Performance in New Product Development”, Communications of the IIMA, 13(1), 43-56.
  • Balsmeier, B., F. Lee, M. Gustavo (2017), “Independent Boards and Innovation”, Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 536-557.
  • Baraco, D. G., A. M. Brown (2008), “Corporate Social Reporting and Board Representation: Evidence from The Kenyan Banking Sector”, Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 309-324.
  • Beck, N., J. N. Katz (1995), “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Times-Series–Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics”, American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634– 647.
  • Bhargava, A., L. Franzni, W. Narendranathan (1982), “Serial Correlation and Fixed Effect Mdels”, Review of Economic Studies, 49, 533-549.
  • Blibech, N., S. Berraies (2018), “The Impact of CEO' Duality and Board's Size and Independence on Firms’ Innovation and Financial Performance”, Journal of Business Management and Economics, 9(1), 22-29.
  • Bobillo, A., J. A. Rodríguez-Sanz, F. Tejerina-Gaite (2017), “Corporate Governance Drivers of Firm Innovation Capacity”, Rev Int Econ, 1–21.
  • Boz, D., C. Duran, S. Yurt (2019), “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluk ve Kurumsal Yönetim Arasındaki Etkileşimin Veri Zarflama İle Analizi: BİST Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksindeki Firmalar Üzerinde Bir Uygulama”, Journal of Yaşar University, 14(54), 119-126.
  • Burmaoğlu, S., H. Şeşen (2011), “Türk Firmalarının Organizasyonel İnovasyon Yeteneğini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 66(4), 1-11.
  • Bushman, R., J. S. Abbie (2003), “Transparency, Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance”, Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65-87.
  • Chang, R. D., Y.W. Chang, C. P. Chang, F. Hu (2008), “The Effects of Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Investment Opportunity Set on Firm Performance”, Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(4), 135 – 148.
  • Cheng, E. C. M., S. M. Courtenay (2006), “Board Composition, Regulatory Regime and Voluntary Disclosure”, The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262 – 289.
  • Coad, A., R. Rao (2010), “Firm Growth and R&D Expenditure”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 127-145.
  • Choi, S. B., B. Il Park, P. Hong (2012), “Does Ownership Structure Matter for Firm Technological Innovation Performance?”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 267- 288.
  • Cook, A., C. Glass (2015), “Do Minority Leaders Affect Corporate Practice? Analyzing the Effect of Leadership Composition on Governance and Product Development”, Strategic Organization, 13(2), 117-140.
  • Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2020), The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation?, Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf, E.T.: 21.09.2020.
  • Cumming, B. S. (1998), “Innovation Overview and Future Challenges”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 21-29.
  • Den Hertog, P., R. Bilderbeek, S. Maltha (1997), “Intangibles: The Soft Side of Innovation”, Futures, 29, 33–45.
  • Doğan, M., B. L. Elitaş, V. Ağca, S. Ögel (2013), “The Impact of CEO Duality on Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2), 149-155.
  • Doğan, M., F. Yıldız (2013), “Araştırma ve Geliştirme Harcamaları Firma Karlılığını Etkiler Mi? Türkiye Örneği”, V. International Congress on Entrepreneurship, 5-7 Haziran, Almatı: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, 166-172.
  • Driver, C., M. J. C. Guedes (2012), “Research and Development, Cash Flow, Agency and Governance: UK Large Companies”, Research Policy, 41(9), 1565-1577.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003), Basic Econometrics, New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
  • Güleş, K. H., H. Bülbül (2004), Yenilikçilik: İşletmeler İçin Stratejik Rekabet Aracı, İstanbul: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Güner, M., E. Kurnaz (2019), “Muhasebe Bilgi Sisteminin Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamalarına Etkisi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 297-313.
  • Hall, R. (1993), “A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabiliites to Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 607–618.
  • Higgins, J. M. (1996), “Innovate or Evaporate: Creative Techniques for Strategist”, Long Range Planning, 29(3), 370- 380.
  • Hoang, C.C., B.H. Ngoc (2019), “The Relationship between Innovation Capability and Firm’s Performance in Electronic Companies, Vietnam”, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 295-304.
  • Hopt, P. K. (2000), Modern Company Law Problems: A European Perspective. Company Law Reform in OECD Countries, Stockholm: Sweden.
  • Jermias, J. (2007), “The Effects of Corporate Governance on the Relationship between Innovative Efforts and Performance”, European Accounting Review, 16(4), 827- 854.
  • Jesover, F., G. Kirkpatrick (2005), “The Revised OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and Their Relevance to Non- OECD Countries”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 127-136.
  • Kaya, A. (2014), “Menkul Kıymet Piyasaları Ekonomik Büyümenin Bir Dinamiği midir? Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelere Yönelik Panel Veri Analizi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28 (4), 285-306.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012), “Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve İçsel Unsurları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Laksmana, I. (2008), “Corporate Board Governance and Voluntary Disclosure of Executive Compensation Practices”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (4), 1147-1182.
  • Makkonen, T., A. M. Williams, A. Habersetzer (2018), “Foreign Board Members and Firm Innovativeness: An Exploratory Analysis For Setting A Research Agenda”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1-32.
  • Mallette, P., K. L. Fowler (1992), “Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of ‘Poison Pills”, Academy of Management Journal, 35 (5), 1010–1035.
  • Mat Rabi, N., A. H. Zulkafli, C. M. H. Haat (2010), “Corporate Governance, Innovation Investment and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Public Listed Companies”, Journal of Management, Economia. Seria Management, 13(2), 225-239.
  • Mezghanni, B. S. (2010), “How CEO Attributes Affect Firm R&D Spending? New Evidence from A Panel of French Firms”, Post-Print hal-00479532, HAL.
  • Miller, T., A. C. Triana (2009), “Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity–Firm Performance Relationship”, Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786.
  • Minetti R., P. Murro, M. Paiella (2015), “Ownership Structure, Governance, and Innovation”, European Economic Review, 80(2015), 165-193.
  • Minow, N., A. G. Robert (1996), Corporate Governance (2nd. Ed), USA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Mueller, S. (2004), “Gender Gaps in Potential for Entrepreneurship Across Countries and Cultures”, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9, 199–220.
  • Müller, V. O. (2014), “The Impact of Board Composition on the Financial Performance of FTSE100 Constituents”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(2014), 969 – 975.
  • Na, K., K. Shin (2019), “The Gender Effect on a Firm’s Innovative Activities in the Emerging Economies”, Sustainability, 11, 1 – 24.
  • Nielsen, S. (2010), “Top Management Team Diversity: A Review of Theories and Methodologies”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 301-316.
  • Ocak, M., Arıkboğa, D. (2017), “Kurumsal Yönetişim Bileşenlerinin Tahakkuk Esaslı Kâr Yönetimi Üzerine Etkileri: Bağımsız Üyelerin ve Kadın Üyelerin Önemi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1), 98 – 116.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019), 2019 Innovation Indicators Tables, https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/innovation-indicators-2019.zip E.T.: 12.09.2020.
  • Önder, Ş., N. N. Kavak (2019), “Sigorta Şirketlerinde Kurumsal Yönetim ve Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişki”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 62, 170-183.
  • Public Disclosure Platform (2020). https://www.kap.org.tr/tr/ E.T.: 01.01.2020.
  • Quintana-Garcia, C., C. A. Benavides-Velasco (2016), “Gender Diversity in Top Management Teams and Innovation Capabilities: The Initial Public Offerings of Biotechnology Firms”, Long Range Planning, 49(4), 507 – 518.
  • Rajapathirana, R. P. J., Y. Hui (2018), “Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type, and Firm Performance”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55.
  • Rechner, P. L., D. R. Dalton (1991), “CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (2), 155–160.
  • Saliha, T., A. Abdessatar (2011), “The Determinants of Financial Performance: An Empirical Test Using the Simultaneous Equations Method”, Economics and Finance Review, 10(1), 01 – 19.
  • Samaha, K., K. Dahawy, K. Hussainey, P. Stapleton (2012), “The Extent of Corporate Governance Disclosure and Its Determinants in a Developing Market: The Case of Egypt”, Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28, 168–178.
  • Saunila, M., S. Pekkola, J. Ukko (2014), “The Relationship between Innovation Capability and Performance: The Moderating Effect of Measurement”, International Journal of Productivityand Performance Management, 63(2), 234-249.
  • Shapiro, D., Y. Tang, M. Wang, W. Zhang (2015), “The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms”, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13(4), 311-335.
  • Sunday, O., O. Godvin (2017), “Effects of Board Globalizing on Financial Performance of Banks in Nigeria”, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(4), 1-10.
  • Tan, Ş. (2016), SPSS ve Excel Uygulamalı Temel İstatistik-I. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2016), Panel Veri Ekonometrisi, İstanbul: Beta Yayın.
  • Tırpancı, İ. (2019), “Türkiye'de Kurumsal Yönetim ve Şirketlerin Finansal Performansları Üzerine Etkisi”, Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 29, 115-129.
  • Tribo, J., P. Berrone, J. Surroca (2007), “Do The Type and Number of Blockholders Influence R&D Investments? New Evidence from Spain”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 828-842.
  • Tuan, K. (2019), “Yönetim Kurulu Özelliklerinin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarına Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 36, 233-242.
  • TÜİK (2020), Yenilikçi Girişimler ve Yenilik Türleri İstatistikleri. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist, E.T.: 12.09.2020.
  • Ujunwa, A., I. Nwakoby, C.O. Ugbam (2012), “Corporate Board Diversity and Firm Performance: Evidence from Nigeria”, Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(2), 216-223.
  • Ün, T. (2018), Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi, İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
  • Xu, P., G. Bai (2019), “Board Governance, Sustainable Innovation Capability and Corporate Expansion: Empirical Data from Private Listed Companies in China”, Sustainability, 11, 1-17.
  • Yasser, Q.R., A. Al Mamun, A.R. Suriya (2014), “CEO Duality Structure and Firm Performance in Pakistan”, Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 5, 57–69.
  • Yorgancılar, F. N. (2011), “Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Anlayışı Olarak Yenilik Yeteneği”, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(21), 379-426.
  • YuSheng, K., M. Ibrahim (2020), “Innovation Capabilities, Innovation Types, and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of Ghana”, SAGE Open, 10(2), 1-12.
  • Zhang, J. (2004), The Impact of Innovation Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on Industrial Firms in China's Transitional Economy, University of Wollongong School of Management and Marketing, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Dubai.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1983
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dekanlığı