___

• Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In Costner, H. L. (ed.), Sociological Methodology. Jossey—Bass, San Francisco. 17—50.
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefŞcient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98—104.
• Crano, W D., & Brewer, M. B. (1973). Principles of research in social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Cronbach, L.]. (1951). CoefŞcient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
• Cronbach, L. J. & Shavelson R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefŞcient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
• Cronbach, L. J., Schonemann, P., & McKie, D. (1965). Alpha coefŞcients for stratiŞed-parallel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25,29 1-3 12.
• Feldt, L. S. & Qualls, A. L. (1996). Bias in coefŞcient alpha arising from heterogeneity of test content. Applied Measurement in Education. 9(3), 277-286.
• Gorusch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. (1977). Limitations of coefŞcient alpha as an index of text unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827—839.
• Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255-282.
• Iacobucci, D., & Duhachek, A. (2003). Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with conŞdence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 478-487.
• Jackson, P. H., & Agunwamba, C. C. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of total scores on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: I. Algebraic lower bounds. Psychometrika, 42, 567-578.
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
• Komaroff, E. (1997). Effect of simultaneous violations of essential tau-equivalence and uncorrelated error on coefŞcient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 337-348.
• Liu, Y., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). The Impact of Outliers on Cronbach’s CoefŞcient Alpha Estimate of Reliability: Visual Analogue Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 620-634.
• Lucke, J. F. (2005). The (x and a) of congeneric test theory: An extension of reliability and internal consistency to heterogeneous tests. Applied Psychological Measurements. 29(1), 65-81.
• McDonald, R. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
• Miller, M. B. (1995). CoefŞcient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 255-273.
• Osburn, H. G. (2000). CoefŞcient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343-355.
• Poon, W Y, Leung, K, and Lee, S. Y. (2002). The comparison of single item constructs by relative mean and relative variance. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 275-298.
• Rae. G. (2006). Correcting CoefŞcient Alpha for Correlated Errors: Is uK a Lower Bound to Reliability? Applied Psychological Measuremet, 30(1), 56-59.
• Raykov, T. (1997). Scale reliability, Cronbach's coefŞcient alpha, and violations of essential tauequivalence with Şxed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 329-353.
• Raykov, T. (1998). CoefŞcient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 375-385.
• Raykov, T. (2001). Bias of coefŞcient a. for Şxed congeneric measures with correlated errors. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 69-76.
• Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefŞcient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350—353.
• Scholz, U., Gutiérrez Doza , B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efŞcacy a universal construct? Psychometric Şndings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-EfŞcacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37).Windsor, UK: NFER- Nelson.
• Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72a101.
• Traub, E. R. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and Applications. Measurement methods for the social sciences. Sage Publications, 1994.
• van Zyl, J. M., Neudecker, H., & Nel, D. G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelilıood estimator of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 65, 271-280.
• Yuan, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2002). On robustness of the normal-theory cased asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefŞcient estimates. Psychometrika, 67, 251—259.
• Yurdugül, H. (2005). Konjenerik test kuranu ve konjenerik madde analizi: Tek boyutlu çoktan seçmeli testler üzerine bir uygulama. A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(2), 21-47
• Yurdugül, H. (2006). Paralel, eşdeğer ve konjenerik ölçmelerde güvenirlik katsayılanmn karşılaştırılması. A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 15-37.
• Yurdugul, H. (2009). SIMREL: A Software for the coefŞcient alpha and its conŞdence intervals with Monte Carlo studies, Applied Psychological Measurement, 33 (4), 325-328.
• Zimmerman, D. W., Zumbo, B.D. & Lalonde, C. (1993). CoefŞcient Alpha as an estimate of test reliability under violation of two assumptions. Etucational and Psychological Measurement, 53 (1), 33-49.
• Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s oc, Revelle’s, B and McDonalds 0): their relations With each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 1-11.