Özgür BUDAK

Yeni Ekonomi ve Toplumsal Sınırlar: İzmir’de Örgütsüz Kapitalizmin Kültürel Örüntüsü

Esnek istihdam şartları altında ortaya çıkan sosyal ayrışma hatları ile kültürel yatkınlıklar arasındaki bağlarBourdieu sonrası literatürde artan oranda incelenmektedir. Söz konusu incelemede kültürel yatkınlık meslek,istihdam piyasası, organizasyon yapısı gibi daha geniş nesnel konfigürasyonlar göz önüne alınarak analizedilmektedir. Bu açıdan bakıldığında kültürel sınırlar daha geniş mülkiyet ilişkilerinin perspektifinden takipedilmektedir. Bu çalışmada yeni ekonomi ve esnek istihdam koşulları altında kariyer kurmaya çalışan beyazyakalıların kimlik ve sosyal hudutları inşa süreçlerine odaklanılarak bir sosyal tip tanımlanmayaçalışılmaktadır.

New Economy and Social Boundaries: Cultural Patterns of Disorganized Capitalism in İzmir

The post-Bourdieu literature witnesses an increasing attention on the social boundaries and cultural dispositions under the new economy and flexible employment regime. The investigation aims to understand the cultural appropriation and dispositions while retaining a pespective of objective configurations within occupations, labour market, and organizational structure; consequently analyzing the changing cultural boundaries from an angle of property relations. This study aims to analyze the relationship between the new economy and flexible employment by building a social type of a white collar adapting such a social and professional environment.

PDF

___

Bennett T., Savage M., Silva E., Warde A., Gayo‐Cal M. ve Wright D. (2009), Culture, class, distinction, London, ESRC Center, Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1996), Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, London, Routledge.
David, H. (2000), The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change, Oxford: Blackwell.
Di Maggio, P. (1992), Cultural boundaries and structural change: the extension of the high culture model to theatre, opera and dance, In M. Lamont and M. Fournier (Ed.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality, (ss. 21-58), Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Featherstone, M. (1998), Consumer culture and postmodernism, London, Sage Publications.
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1980), Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain, New York : Oxford University Press.
Jackall, R. (2009), Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers, London: Oxford University Press.
Jessop, B. (2002), The future of the capitalist state, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kanter, R. (2004), Men and women of the corporation and the change masters, The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 92-95.
Kurtuluş, H. (Ed.) (2005), İstanbul’da kentsel ayrışma, İstanbul, Bağlam Yayınları.
Kurtuluş, H. (2012), Orta Sınıfların Ortak Paydası Neoliberal Değerler, Express, (127), 10-13.
Lahire, B. (2003), From the Habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions: Towards a sociology at the level of the individual, Poetics, (31), 329‐355.
Lamont, M. (1992), Money, morals and manners: The culture of the French and American Upper‐Middle Class, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lash S. ve Urry J. (1987), The end of organized capitalism, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lash S. ve Urry J. (1994), Economies of signs and space, London: Sage Publications. Mandel, E. (1999), Late capitalism, London: Verso Classics 23.
Peterson, R. ve Kern R.M. (1996), Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore, American Sociological Review, (61), 900-907.
Sennett, R. (1998), The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism, New York: W.W. Norton.
Sennett, R. (2005), The culture of the new capitalism, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smith, N. (1996), The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city, New York: Routledge.
Weber, M. (1978), Economy and society, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wright, E. O. (2005), Approaches to class analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.