5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Çokgenler ve Dörtgenler Konularında Sahip Oldukları Kavram Yanılgılarının Belirlenmesi

Bu çalışmada beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin “Çokgenler”ve “Dörtgenler” konularında sahip oldukları kavramyanılgıları ve bu yanılgılara temel olan düşünme biçimleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan veritoplama yöntemi, kavram yanılgılarını tespit etmekamacıyla hazırlanan teşhis testinden oluşmuştur.Çoktan seçmeli bölümde verilen cevaplarla beraberilgili gerekçe bölümünde verilen cevaplar da dikkatealınmıştır. Çoktan seçmeli soru-İlgili gerekçe tablosuhazırlanmış verilen cevap ve gerekçelerine göre farklıpuanlama yapılmıştır. Çalışmada Aydın ilindeki beşincisınıf öğrencileri evren olarak alınmış, Aydın merkezokullarından 3 tanesindeki 200 tane beşinci sınıföğrencisi örneklem olarak seçilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularında beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin çokgen, üçgen, kare,dikdörtgen, paralelkenar, eşkenar dörtgen, beşgen,altıgen, yamuk, köşegen, yükseklik kavramları ile ilgilisahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları tespit edilmiş vealınması gereken önlemler tartışılmıştır.

Determining the Misconceptions of Fifth Grade Students about Polygons and Quadrilaterals

In this study, it was aimed to determine the misconceptions of fifth grade students about “polygons” and “quadrilaterals” and the thinking styles that are the basis of these misconceptions. The data collection method in this study was composed of the identification test. Multiple-choice questions and Justification section was scored carefully in the test. The fifth grade students in Aydın province were determined as the population and 200 fifth grade students studying in three elementary schools in the central district of Aydın province were determined as the sample. In the research, the misconceptions of fifth grade students in terms of polygon, triangle, square, rectangle, parallelogram, rhombus, pentagon, hexagon, trapezoid, diagonal and height were determined and the precautions were discussed.

___

  • Akdemir, M. (2005). İlköğretim ikinci kademe yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin katı ve sıvıların basıncı konusunda sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları. (Yayımlanmamış yükseklisans tezi), Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir.
  • Al-Rubayea, A. A. M. (1996). An analysis of saudi arabian high school students’ misconceptions about physics concepts. Kansas State University, Dissertation Abstracts International University Microfilms No. 9629018
  • Battista, M. T. (2002). Learning Geometry in A Dynamic Computer Environment. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 633-639
  • Bergeson, T. (2000). Teaching and learning mathematics. State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Washington.
  • Can, Ö. (2009). Veri yapıları eğitimi alan öğrencilerin listeler konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta.
  • Ching-Yuan Chang (1996). A study of the way of students’ constructing geometry concept and the evaluation of the effrectrs of geometry yeaching strategies with ıntegrated cooperative learning, http://www.ceps.com.tw/ec/ecjnlarticleview.aspx
  • Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Cutugno, p. & Spagnolo, fç (2002). Misconception about triangle in elementary school, http://www.math.unipa.it/grim/SiCutugnoSpa.PDF
  • Driver,R.;R, Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms. a review of literature related to concept development ınadolescent science students. Studies in Science Education.61-84.
  • Driver, R; Guesne, E.;Tiberghien, A.(1985). Children's ideas and the learning of science, ın r. driver et al. (eds.) children's ıdeas in science, pp. 1-9, Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Pres.
  • Duatepe, A.-Ersoy, Y. (2001). Teknoloji destekli matematik öğretimi-l: hesap makinesi ve okullarda geometri öğretimi. Matematik Etkinlikleri 2001 Sempozyumu, Ankara,110-119.
  • Fisher, K.M. (1985). A misconception in biology: aminoacids and translation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.22,pp.53-62.
  • Fuys D.J. & Liebov, A (1993). Geometry and spatial sense. in research ideas for the classroom, edited by R. J- Jensen, 219, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
  • Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of chemistry: electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (10), 1079-1099.
  • Gedik, E., Ertepınar, H., Geban, Ö. (2002). Lise öğrencilerinin elektrokimya konusundaki kavramları anlamalarında kavramsal değişim yaklaşımına dayalı gösteri yönteminin etkisi, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Bildirileri, Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, , 16-18 Eylül 2002, Cilt2.
  • Grande, J.(1985).Can grade 2 children’s spatial perception belmproved by ınserting a transformational geometry component into their mathematics program? Ph.D.diss., Institute for Studies in Education(Ontario).
  • Halloun, I A; & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion.American Journal of Physics, 1056-1065
  • Haslam, F. & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two- tier multiple choice Instrument, Journal of Biological Education, 21 (3), 203-211.
  • Helm,H. (1980). Misconcentions in physics amongst south african students. Physics Education, 92-105.
  • Karataş, F.; Köse S.; Ve Coştu B. (2003). Öğrenci yanılgılarını ve anlama düzeylerini belirlemede kullanılan iki aşamalı testler, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Yıl:2003 (1) Sayı:13.
  • Koester, B. A. (2003). Prisms and pyramids: Constructing three-dimensional models to build understanding, Teaching children mathematics, 9(8), 436- 442.
  • Lawson, A. E. And Thompson, L. D., (1988). Formal reasing ability and misconception concerning geneticsand natural selection, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.25: (733–746).
  • Mann, M., Treagust, D. F. (1998). A pencil and paper ınstrument to diagnose students’ conception of breathing, gas exchange and respiration, Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44, 2, 55-59.
  • Mason, M. M (1989). Geometric understanding and misconceptions among gifted fourtheighth graders. American Educational Research Association: San Franmsisco, CA, March 27-31
  • Marek, E. A.; Cawon, C. C. And Cavallo, A. M. L., (1994). Students misconceptions about difusion: how can they be eliminated, The American Biology Teacher, Vol.56: (77)
  • National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (1997). Possible Health Effects of Exposure to Residential Electric and Magnetic Fields. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1997.
  • National Council of Teaching Mathematics. (2007). Retrieved at May 17, 2017 from http://standarts.nctm.org/document/chapter3/geom.htm
  • National Council of Teaching Mathematics. (2007). Retrieved at May 17, 2017 from http://standarts.nctm.org/document/chapter7/geom.htm
  • Novak.J.D.;Gowın,B.D.(1984).Learning how to learn. NewYork: Cambridge University Press
  • Odom, A. L., Barrow, H. L. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biaology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after acourse of ınstruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 45-61.
  • Oberdorf, C., & Taylor-Cox, J. (1999). Shape up! Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 340-345.
  • Özçelik, D. A. (1998). Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları, Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Matbaası.
  • Peterson, R.F., Treagust, D.F., ve Garnett, P.J. (1989). Development and application of covalent bonding and structure following a course of ınstruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26 (4), 301-314.
  • Porter, A. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: The case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher, 18, 9-15
  • PISA(2015). Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • Sutton,C.R.(1980).The learner's rrior knowledge: a critical review of techniques for probing ıts organization. European Journal of ScienceEducation.107-120.
  • Tan, K. C. D., Goh, K. N., Chia, S. L. & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic ınstrument to assess high school students’ understanding of ınorganic chemistry qualitative analysis, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 4, 283-301.
  • Treagust, D. F.(1988), Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science, International Journal of Science Education, vol.10,pp.9,159-169
  • Treagust, D.F., Duit, R. & Fraser, B. (Eds) (1996). Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • TIMMS(2015).International Results in Mathematics (2015).TIMMS PIRLS International Study Center Lynch School of Education, Boston College Publishing, Boston
  • Turgut, M. F. (1995). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Metotları. Ankara: Yargıcı Matbaası.
  • TDK. (2015). Türk Dil Kurumu Türkçe Sözlük, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
  • Tyson, L., Treagust, D. F., Bucat, R. B. (1999). The complexity teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 76 (4), 554- 558.
  • Ubuz, B. (1999). 10. ve 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin temel geometri konularındaki hataları ve kavram yanılgıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16-17: 95-104.
  • Voska, K. W., Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conception used to solve chemical equilibrium problems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 2, 160-176.
  • Yılmaz, Ö.(1998). Kavramsal değişim metinleri ile verilen kavram haritalarının hücre bölünmesi ünitesini anlamadaki etkisi, (Yayımlanmamış yükseklisans tezi), Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Zeilik,M.(2004).İnternetSitesi Retrieved at March 16, 2017 from http://www.flaguide.org/extra/download/cat/diagnostic/diagnostic.pdf
  • Van De Walle, J. (1989). Elementary school mathematics. New York: Longman.