Comparison of Two and Six-rowed Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions for Yield, Quality and Biotic Stress Tolerance
Comparison of Two and Six-rowed Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions for Yield, Quality and Biotic Stress Tolerance
Barley is an essential crop in the Trakya region and it grows for feed and malting in the region. The experiments were
carried out in the 2016-2017 growing cycle and composed of 36 two-rowed and 36 six-rowed barley genotypes in alphalattice blocks with three replications. The characters such as grain yield, net blotch, scald, plant height, days of heading,
1000-kernel weight (TKW), test weight (TW) and protein ratio and relationship among them were investigated in the
study. The genotypes were screened for scald and net blotch under natural epidemic conditions. According to the results,
there were significant differences among genotypes for the parameters investigated in the study. The means of grain yield
for two-rowed and six-rowed genotypes were 8576 kg ha-1 and 8454 kg ha-1 respectively. In two-rowed genotypes mean
1000-kernel weight was 51.2 g, test weight 72.9 kg and protein ratio 11.6%. In six-rowed genotypes mean TKW was
37.0 g, TW 69.5 kg and protein ratio 10.8%. In two-rowed genotypes based on double-digit scores, a total of 11 barley
genotypes highly tolerant to Net blotch (Pyrenophora teres) scored between 11 and 33. Net blotch effect on grain yield,
1000-kernel weight, test weight and protein ratio were slightly negative for two-rowed genotypes. Scald leaf disease
negatively affected 1000-kernel weight (r=-0.391*) and test weight (r=-0.482**). Scald leaf disease also negatively
affected grain yield. In the study, 5 genotypes from the 2-rowed experiments and 2 genotypes from a 6-rowed experiment
were selected for breeding studies based on parameters investigated.
___
- Bacher J, Wenzig K and Vogler M, (2004). SPSS two-step
cluster - a first evaluation. Univ. Erlangennürnb.
1:1-20
- Chiu T, Fang D, Chen J, Wang Y and Jeris C, (2001).
A robust and scalable clustering algorithm
for mixed type attributes in a large database
environment, in Proceedings of the Seventh
ACM SIGKDD International Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD
’01, (New York, NY: ACM Press), 263-268.
- Couture L, (1980). Assessment of severity of foliage
diseases of cereals in cooperative evaluation tests.
Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 60:8-10.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA, (1984). Statistical
procedures for agricultural research. 2nd Ed. John
Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641.
- Gouis Le J, (1992). A comparison between two and
six-row winter barley genotypes for aboveground dry matter production and distribution.
Agronomie, EDP Sciences, 12(2):163-171.
- Gupta M, Abu-Ghannam N and Gallaghar E, (2010).
Barley for brewing. Characteristic changes
during malting, brewing and applications of its
by-products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food
Science and Food Safety 9:318-328. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00112.x
- Kandic V, Dodig D, Secanski M, Prodanovic S,
Brankovic G and Titan P, (2019). Grain yield,
agronomic traits, and protein content of two- and
six-row barley genotypes under terminal drought
conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural
Research 79(4):648-657.
- Kandic V, Dodig D, Zoric M, Nikolic A, Surlan
Momirovic G, Kaitovic Z, Aleksic G and Duric
N, (2018). Grain filling parameters of two-and
six-rowed barley genotypes in terminal drought
conditions. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology,
23(2):5-14.
- Lang L, Rakszegi M and Bedo Z, (2013). Cereal
production and its characteristics. Engineering
aspects of cereal and cereal-based products. CRC
Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
- Marwat SK, Hashimi M, Usman Khan K, Aslam
Khan M, Shoaib M and Rehman F, (2012).
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) a prophetic food
mentioned in Ahadith and its ethnobotanical
importance. American-Eurasian Journal of
Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.
12:835-841.
- Öztürk İ, (2019). Comparison of two and six-rowed
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes based
on yield and agronomic characters. Agriculture
& Food. 7:75-85.
- Öztürk İ, Avcı R, Girgin VC, Kahraman T, Şili S,
Kılıç TH, Vulchev D, Valcheva D and Goceva
M, (2018). Effect of biomass at different growth
stages on yield and agronomic characters in barley
(Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Agriculture &
Food, 6:15-25. 2018
- Przulj N and Momcilovic V, (2012). Spring barley
performances in the Pannonian zone. Genetika.
44(3):499-512.
- Reid JF, Choo TM, Ho KM, Martin RA and Konishi T,
(2001). Comparisons of two-row and six-row
barley for chemical composition using doubledhaploid lines. Crop Sci. 41:1737-1743.
Saari EE and Prescott JM, (1975). A scale for appraising
the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant. Dis.
Rep. 59:377-380.
- Ward JH, (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an
objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58:236-
244.
- Zadoks J, Chang T and Konzak C, (1974). A decimal
code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed
Research 14:415-421.
- Zwirek M, Waugh R and McKim SM, (2019).
Interaction between row type genes in barley
controls meristem determinacy and reveals
novel routes to improved grain. New Phytologist
221:1950-1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/
nph.15548.