Adaptation of the Energy Literacy Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study*

Adaptation of the Energy Literacy Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study*

The purpose of the current study was to adapt the “Energy Literacy Scale” developed by DeWaters, Qaqish, Graham and Powers (2013) into Turkish and to ensure its reliability and validity for the Turkish context. The items were first translated into Turkish and then back translated into English. In the next stage, the consistency between the translations was checked to analyze any missing in meaning. English lecturer evaluated items’ comprehensibility levels, word and sentence structures and cultural compliance level. The scale was administered to 550 students from middle schools in the city of Muğla. Then, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was firstly conducted to establish the construct validity of the scale. Later, to test the model fit of the item-factor structure obtained from EFA, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was run. Finally, Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was calculated for the whole scale and for each factor. The results appeared a three-factor scale (cognitive, affective and behavioral).Moreover, the internal consistency coefficients for each factor ranged from .72 to .82 as well as the coefficient for the whole scale was found to be .83. Overall,a valid and reliablescalewas developed toevaluatesecondaryschool students’ energy literacy levels of energy education.

___

  • Akitsu, Y.,Ishihara, K. N., Okumura, H., &Yamasue, E. (2017). Investigatingenergyliteracyanditsstructural model forlowersecondarystudents in Japan.International Journal of EnvironmentalandScienceEducation,12(5), 1067-1095.
  • Ajzen, I. &Fishbein, M. (1980). Understandingattitudesandpredictingsocialbehavior.EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Armaroli, N. &Balzani, V. (2007). Thefuture of energysupply: challengesandopportunities. AngewandteChemie International Edition, 46 (1–2), 52–66.
  • Barrow, L. H. &Morrisey, J. T. (1989). Energyliteracy of ninth-gradestudents: A comparisonbetween Maine and New Brunswick. Journal of EnvironmentalEducation, 20(2), 22-25.
  • Bodzin, A. (2012). Investigating urban eight-gradestudents’ knowledge of energyresources. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 34(8), 1255-1275.
  • Bodzin, A.M., Fu, Q., Peffer, T.E., &Kulo, V. (2013). Developingenergyliteracy in US middle-levelstudentsusingthegeospatialcurriculumapproach.International Journal of ScienceEducation,35(9), 1561-1589.
  • Boylan, C. (2008). Exploringelementarystudents’ understanding of energyandclimatechange.International Electronic Journal of ElementaryEducation,1(1), 1-15.
  • Brounen, D., Kok, N., &Quigley, J.M. (2013). Energyliteracy, awareness, andconservationbehavior of residentialhouseholds.EnergyEconomics,38, 42-50.
  • Chen, K.L.,Liu,S.Y., &Chen, P.H. (2015). Assessingmultidimensionalenergyliteracy of secondarystudentsusingcontextualizedassessment.International Journal of EnvironmentalandScienceEducation,10(2), 201-218.
  • Chen, S.J.,Chou, Y.C., Yen, H.Y., &Chao, Y.L. (2015). Investigatingandstructuralmodelingenergyliteracy of highschoolstudents in Taiwan.EnergyEfficiency,8(4), 791-808.
  • Chikaire, J.U., Ani, A.O., Nnadi, F.N., &Godson-Ibeji, C.C. (2015). Energyextensionandenergyliteracyforsustainableenergydevelopment in ruralNigeria.AgriculturalAdvances,4(8), 84-92.
  • Cotton, D.R.E., Miller, W., Winter, J., Bailey, I., &Sterling, S. (2015). Developingstudents’ energyliteracy in highereducation.International Journal of Sustainability in HigherEducation,16(4), 456-473.
  • DeWaters, J. E. &Powers, S. E. (2011). Energyliteracy of secondarystudents in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, andbehavior.Energypolicy,39(3), 1699-1710.
  • DeWaters, J. & Powers, S. (2013). Establishingmeasurementcriteriafor an energyliteracyquestionnaire.TheJournal of EnvironmentalEducation,44(1), 38-55.
  • DeWaters, J.,Qaqish, B., Graham, M., & Powers, S. (2013). Designing an energyliteracyquestionnaireformiddleandhighschoolyouth. Journal of Environment Education, 44(1), 56–78.
  • Fah, L.Y.,Hoon, K.C., Munting, E.T., &Chong, C.A. (2012). Secondaryschoolstudents' energyliteracy: Effect of genderandschoollocation.OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development,3(7), 75-86.
  • Göcük, A. & Şahin, F. (2016). Theeffect of problem basedlearning on 5thgradesstudents’ energyliteracy.Journal of Human Sciences,13(2), 3446-3468.
  • Güven, G. & Sülün, Y. (2017). Pre-service teachers' knowledgeandawarenessaboutrenewableenergy.RenewableandSustainableEnergyReviews,80, 663-668.
  • Hırça, N., Çalık, M., & Akdeniz, F. (2008). Investigatinggrade 8 students’ conceptions of energyandrelatedconcepts. Journal of TurkishScienceEducation, 5(1), 75-85.
  • Horst, D., Harrison, C., Staddon, S., &Wood, G. (2016). Improvingenergyliteracythroughstudent-ledfieldwork–at home.Journal of Geography in HigherEducation,40(1), 67-76.
  • Jin, H. &Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learningprogressionforenergy in socio-ecologicalsystems. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 49(9), 1149-1180.
  • Karpudewan, M.,Ponniah, J., &Zain, A.N.M. (2016). Project-basedlearning: An approachtopromoteenergyliteracyamongsecondaryschoolstudents.TheAsia-Pacific EducationResearcher,25(2), 229-237.
  • Lay, Y. F.,Khoo, C. H., Treagust, D. F., &Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2013). Assessingsecondaryschoolstudents' understanding of therelevance of energy in theirdailylives.International Journal of EnvironmentalandScienceEducation,8(1), 199-215.
  • Lee, L.S.,Chang, L.T., Lai, C.C., Guu, Y.H., & Lin, K.Y. (2015). Energyliteracy of vocationalstudents in Taiwan.EnvironmentalEducationResearch,23(6), 855-873.
  • Lee, H.S. &Liu, O.L. (2010). Assessinglearningprogression of energyconceptsacrossmiddleschoolgrades: Theknowledgeintegrationperspective.ScienceEducation, 94(4), 665-688.
  • Lee, L.S., Lee, Y.F., Altschuld, J.W., &Pan, Y.J. (2015). Energyliteracy: Evaluatingknowledge, affect, andbehavior of students in Taiwan.EnergyPolicy,76, 98-106.
  • Liu, X. &Tang, L. (2004). Theprogression of students’ conceptions of energy: A cross-grade, cross-culturalstudy. CanadianJournal of Science, MathematicsandTechnologyEducation, 4(1), 43-57.
  • Opitz, S. T.,Harms, U., Neumann, K., Kowalzik, K., & Frank, A. (2015). Students’ energyconcepts at thetransitionbetweenprimaryandsecondaryschool.Research in ScienceEducation, 45(5), 691-715.
  • Panwar, N. L.,Kaushik, S. C., &Kothari, S. (2011). Role of renewableenergysources in environmentalprotection: A review. RenewableandSustainableEnergyReviews, 15(3), 1513-1524.
  • Rizaki, A. &Kokkotas, P. (2013). Theuse of historyandphilosophy of science as a corefor a socioconstructivistteachingapproach of theconcept of energy in primaryeducation. Science&Education, 22(5), 1141-1165.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K.,Moosbrugger, H., &Müler, H. (2003). Evaluatingthe fit of structuralequationmodels: Tests of significanceanddescriptivegoodness-of-fit measures. Methods of PsychologicalResearch Online, (8)2, 23-74.
  • Seçer, İ. (2013). SPSS ve Lisrel ile pratik veri analizi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Sovacool, B.K. &Blyth, P.L. (2015). Energyandenvironmentalattitudes in thegreenstate of Denmark: implicationsforenergydemocracy, lowcarbontransitions, andenergyliteracy.EnvironmentalScience&Policy,54, 304-315.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri Analizi (3. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Töman, U. & Odabaşı-Çimer, S. (2013). An investigationintotheconceptionenergyconservation at differenteducationallevels.Journal of EducationalandInstructionalStudies in the World, 3(1), 44-52.
  • Ünal-Çoban, G.,Aktamış, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2007). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin enerjiyle ilgili görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 175-184.
  • Yürümezoğlu, K., Ayaz, S., &Çökelez, A. (2009). Grade 7-9 students’ perceptions of energyandrelatedconcepts. NecatibeyFaculty of Education Electronic Journal of ScienceandMathematicsEducation,3(2), 52-73.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-9967
  • Yayın Aralığı: 3
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Matbaası
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Üstün Yetenekli Öğrenci Velileri ile Üstün Yetenekli Tanısı Koyulmamış Öğrenci Velilerinin Karşılaştırılması: Matematik Eğitiminden Beklenti Örneği

Avni YILDIZ, Serdal BALTACI, Cahit AYTEKİN

Secondary School Students' Equality of Opportunity and Possibility Perceptions for Primary Schools and Secondary Schools

Emine ÖNDER, Hatice PETEK

Primary School Teachers and Teacher Candidates' Perceptions of Efficiency in Designing and Implementing Teaching Based on Individual Differences

Ahmet DOĞANAY, Burcu GÜRKAN

Pedagojik Formasyon Sertifika Programı Öğrencilerinin Eğitim İnançlarının İncelenmesi

Fatma SADIK

Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Alan Uzmanlarının Görüşlerine göre Alanın Sorunları ve Sorunlara Yönelik Çözüm Önerileri

Demet SEVER, Dilruba KÜRÜM YAPICIOĞLU, Derya ATİK KARA

Lise Öğrencilerinin Biyoloji Öğrenmeye Yönelik Motivasyonları

Serap ÖZBAŞ

Evlilik Anlamına İlişkin Metaforik Bir İnceleme

Nilüfer ÖZABACI, Serdar KÖRÜK, Ahmet KARA

Mimariyi-Kenti Anlama ve Yorumlama Yaklaşımında Hermenötik Metin Okuma (Kafamda Bir Tuhaflık Romanının İrdelenmesi)

Özlem ŞENYİĞİT, Tuğba TEFEK

İkinci Kariyer Öğretmenleri: Kariyer Değiştirme Nedenleri ve Uyum Durumları

Mehmet Hilmi KOÇ

Ergenlerde Kişilik Tipleri ile Problem Odaklı Stresle Başaçıkma Tarzı Arasındaki Doğrudan ve Dolaylı İlişkiler: Bilişsel Esnekliğin Aracılık Rolü

Bülent GÜNDÜZ, Öner ÇELİKKALELİ