STRATEJİK SATIN ALMA UYGULAMALARININ PERFORMANSA OLAN ETKİSİ: TÜRK KONAKLAMA SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ANALİZ

Bu çalışmada stratejik satın alma uygulamalarının otel performansına olan etkileri incelenmektedir. Hipotezleri test etmek için Türkiye’deki 71 otelden anket yolu ile veri toplanmıştır. İlk olarak, tedarikçi seçim ölçütlerinin kümeleme analizi ile incelenmesi ile “geleneksel” ve “stratejik” olarak adlandırılan iki farklı satın alma stratejisi bulunmuştur. Daha sonra, kısmi en küçük kareler yöntemi kullanılarak tedarikçilerle uzun vadeli ilişkilerin, tedarikçi geliştirmenin ve çevresel tedarikçi geliştirmenin otel performansına etkisi test edilmiştir. Bulgular göstermektedir ki, tedarikçilerle uzun vadeli ilişkiler otellerin pazar performansını ve finansal performansını olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Öte yandan, tedarikçi geliştirmenin pazar performansına ve finansal performansa olan olumlu etkisi sadece geleneksel satın alma stratejilerine sahip olan otellerde görülmüştür. Son olarak, çevresel tedarikçi geliştirme uygulamalarının geleneksel satın alma stratejisine sahip otellerde finansal performansa, stratejik satın alma stratejilerine sahip otellerde ise pazar performansına olumlu yönde etkisi olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

THE EFFECTS OF STRATEGIC PURCHASING PRACTICES ON PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS IN THE TURKISH HOSPITALITY SECTOR

In this study, we examine the impact of strategic purchasing practices on hotel performance. Inorder to test our hypotheses, we use survey data from 71 hotels in Turkey. First, we perform acluster analysis and identify two types of purchasing strategies based on supplier selectioncriteria: traditional vs. strategic. Then, via partial least squares (PLS) method, we test the effectof long-term relationships, supplier development and environmental supplier development onhotel performance. Our results show that long-term relationships have a negative effect on bothmarket and financial performance. Additionally, we find that supplier development has apositive effect on performance, but only for hotels with a traditional purchasing strategy.Interestingly, we find that environmental supplier development has a positive effect on financialperformance in hotels with a traditional purchasing strategy, but a positive effect on marketperformance in hotels with a strategic purchasing strategy.

___

  • Aboelmaged, M. (2018). The drivers of sustainable manufacturing practices in Egyptian SMEs and their impact on competitive capabilities: A PLS-SEM model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 207-221.
  • Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M.F., & Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1872-1881.
  • Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514- 538.
  • Apostolova, B.Z., Kroon, M.J., Richter, M., & Zimmer, I.M., (2015). Strategic purchasing: A global perspective. University of Groningen.
  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1200-1210.
  • Carr, A.S., & Pearson, J.N. (2002). The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(9), 1032-1053.
  • Cheraghi, S.H., Dadashzadeh, M., & Subramanian, M. (2004). Critical success factors for supplier selection: An update. Journal of Applied Business Research, 20(2), 91-108.
  • Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling, in: Modern Methods for Business Research, G.A. Marcoulides (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.
  • Das, A., Narasimhan, R., & Talluri, S. (2006). Supplier integration—finding an optimal configuration. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 563-582.
  • Davras, G.M., & Karaatlı, M. (2014). Otel işletmelerinde tedarikçi seçimi sürecinde AHP ve BAHP yöntemlerinin uygulanması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 87-112.
  • De Toni, A. & Nassimbeni, G. (2000). Just-in-time purchasing: An empirical study of Operational Practices, Supplier Development and Performance. Omega, 28, 631-651.
  • Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5–17.
  • Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C.R (2013). Environmental development of emerging economy suppliers: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Logistics, 34, 131-147.
  • Fantazy, K.A., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2010). Supply management practices and performance in the Canadian hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 685-693.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gadde, L.E., & Håkansson, H. (1994). The changing role of purchasing: reconsidering three strategic issues. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 1(1), 27–35.
  • Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13-47.
  • Göçen, S., Albeni, M., Yirik, Ş., Yildiz, H., & Akdere, M. (2017). Competition, market structure and market power within the hotel-supplier sector in Antalya, Turkey: The case for technology integration. Tourism Economics, 23(3), 647-668.
  • Hoyt, J., & Huq, F. (2000). From arms-length to collaborative relationships in the supply chain: An evolutionary process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(9), 750-764.
  • Huang, S.H., & Keskar, H. (2007). Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(2), 510-523.
  • Humphreys, P.K., Li, W.L., & Chan, L.Y. (2004). The impact of supplier development on buyer–supplier performance. Omega, 32(2), 131–143.
  • Kähkönen, A.K., Lintukangas, K., Ritala, P., & Hallikas, J. (2017). Supplier collaboration practices: Implications for focal firm innovation performance. European Business Review, 29(4), 402–418.
  • Kim, B.Y. (2006). The impact of supplier development on financial performance in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 7(4), 81-103.
  • Krause, D.R., Handfield, R B., & Scannell, T.V. (1998). An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 39-58.
  • Krause, D.R., & Scannell, T.V. (2002). Supplier development practices: product- and servicebased industry comparisons. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(2), 13-21.
  • Krause, D.R., Pagell, M., & Curkovic, S. (2001). Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing. Journal of Operations Management, 19(4), 497-512.
  • Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2018). A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 57 (7), 1-19.
  • Landeros, R., & Monczka, R. M. (1989). Cooperative buyer/seller relationships and a firm's competitive posture. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 25(3), 9-18.
  • Lawson, B., Krause, D., & Potter, A. (2014). Improving supplier new product development performance: The role of supplier development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 777–792.
  • Lee, J. S., Hsu, L. T., Han, H., & Kim, Y. (2010). Understanding how consumers view green hotels: How a hotel’s green image can influence behavioural intentions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(7), 901-914.
  • Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698.
  • Modi, S. B., & Mabert, V. A. (2007). Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 42–64.
  • Menezes, V., & da Cunha, S. (2016). Eco-Innovation in global hotel chains: designs, barriers, incentives and motivations. Brazilian Business Review, 13, 108-128.
  • Önder, E., & Kabadayi, N. (2015). Supplier selection in hospitality industry using ANP. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(1).
  • Öztüren, A., & Sevil, G. (2009). Supply chain management as a sustainable performance booster for the accommodation enterprises: evidence from North Cyprus tourism sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 97-111.
  • Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting (1), 739-742.
  • Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011). The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 561-576.
  • Vonderembse, M.A., & Tracey, M. (1999). The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(2), 33-39.
  • Wilkinson, L., Engelman, L., Corter, J., & Coward, M. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. Wilkinson (Ed.), Systat 10 – Statistics I (pp. 65-124). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
  • Zeller, M., & Drescher, F. (2017). Procurement management in the German restaurant industry: A comparison between top 100 restaurants and smaller restaurants. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 15(4), 360-379.
Beykoz Akademi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Beykoz Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

YEŞİL İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİ VE YEŞİL TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Nurten POLAT DEDE

İŞ MODELİ VE TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ İLE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK: TÜRKİYE’DE KAPSAYICI İŞ MODELLERİ ÜZERİNE KEŞFEDİCİ BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Dicle YURDAKUL

ENTEGRE BULANIK ÇKKV YAKLAŞIMIYLA TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ ANALİTİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Gülçin BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Merve GÜLER, Esin MUKUL, Fethullah GÖÇER

STRATEJİK SATIN ALMA UYGULAMALARININ PERFORMANSA OLAN ETKİSİ: TÜRK KONAKLAMA SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ANALİZ

Melek AKIN ATEŞ, Oğuz AKSOY

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ FİRMALARIN YEŞİL TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Banu DEMIREL, Kevser YILMAZ

YEŞİL ve TERSİNE LOJİSTİK DERSİ ALAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN YEŞİL ÜRÜNE YÖNELİK TUTUMLARININ ve SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞLARININ İNCELENMESİ: NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Selda BAŞARAN ALAGÖZ, Abdullah Oktay DÜNDAR, Aygen SEV

BORSA İSTANBUL’DA İŞLEM GÖREN LOJİSTİK İŞLETMELERİNİN ÇALIŞMA SERMAYESİ YÖNETİMİ, PERFORMANS VE PİYASA DEĞERLERİ

Narman KUZUCU

KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN KORUNMASI YASASININ LOJİSTİK ŞİRKETLERİN İNSAN KAYNAKLARI UYGULAMALARINA ETKİLERİ

Ayşe İLAGA ÇAKIR

DOĞAL AFET DURUMU İÇİN CBS TABANLI MAKSİMUM KAPSAMA YERLEŞİM MODELİ: TUNCELİ ÖRNEĞİ

Erkan ÇELİK, Eren ÖZCEYLAN, Süleyman METE, Barış ÖZKAN

ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIĞIN ESNEK ÇALIŞMA VE İŞ DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİNDEKİ ARACILIK ETKİSİ: LOJİSTİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Nurten POLAT DEDE, Fatma TÜRKMEN