Kayahan KARAYTUG, Mehmet EKİNCİ, Serkan BAYRAM, Yusuf BAYRAM, Savaş ÇAMUR, Sefa BATİBAY, Mehmet KAPICIOĞLU

Comparison of Mid-term Functional Outcomes of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Conservative versus Surgical Treatment

Amaç: Şizofreni tanılı hastalarda klozapin ile eşzamanlı olarak uygulanan elektrokonvulziv tedavinin daha iyi tedavi yanıtı ve hastanede yatış süresinde kısalmaya neden olma olasılığını incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Kadın psikiyatri servisimizde 5 yıl boyunca (01.02.2014 ve 01.02.2019 arasında) yatarak tedavi gören şizofreni tanılı hastaların tıbbi kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Tedavi yanıtını değerlendirmede Klinik Global İzlem – İyileşme (KGİ-İ) ölçeği kullanılmıştı. Bulgular: EKT ile tedavi edilmiş olan 191 olgu içinde; 8 şizofreni olgusu (K-EKT) EKT ve eşzamanlı klozapin ile tedavi edilmiş ve 14 olguya ise (EKT-Ö) önce EKT uygulanmış, sonrasında klozapin tedavisine başlanmıştı. İki grup arasında EKT seans sayıları ve nöbet süreleri açısından anlamlı fark yoktu (p > 0,05). EKT’ ye yanıt oranının (KGİ-İ: 2 ya da 3), K-EKT grubunda %75 (n=6); EKT-Ö grubunda ise %85,7 (n=12) olduğu görüldü. Ortalama KGİ-İ skorları arasında gruplar arasında anlamlı fark yoktu (p > 0,05). K-EKT grubunun hastanede yatış süresi (37,7  14,44 gün), EKT-Ö grubundan (56,0  19,2 gün) daha kısaydı (p = 0,04). EKT seansları sırasında ya da yatışlar süresince ciddi yan etki görülmedi. Sonuç: Her iki uygulamada da tedaviye iyi yanıt yüksek orandaydı ve anlamlı fark yoktu. EKT ile eşzamanlı klozapin uygulamasının hastanede yatış süresini anlamlı oranda kısaltırken ciddi bir komplikasyona ve yan etki artışına neden olmadığı görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

EKT, Şizofreni, Klozapin

Comparison of Mid-term Functional Outcomes of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Conservative versus Surgical Treatment

Purpose: Determining whether adjunctive electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with clozapine leads to better treatment response and fewer days in hospital for patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Medical records of patients with schizophrenia who were treated with ECT-clozapine combination in our women’s mental health clinic in a period of 5 years (between 01.02.2014 and 01.02.2019) were investigated retrospectively. Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale was used for assessing treatment response. Results: Of the 191 cases treated with ECT, there were 8 cases of schizophrenia who were treated with ECT and concomitant clozapine (C-ECT) and 14 cases who were treated with ECT before the initiation of clozapine (ECT-B). Number of ECT sessions and duration of seizures were not significantly different for both groups (p > 0.05). There was good and mild response (CGI-I score of 2 and 3) in 75% of the patients (n=6) for C-ECT and 85.7% of the patients (n=12) for ECT-B. Mean CGI-I scores between the two groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Duration of hospitalization for the C-ECT group (37.7  14.44 days) was shorter than the duration of hospitalization for the ECT-B group (56.0  19.2 days) (p = 0.04). No serious adverse events were observed during the ECT sessions or during the index hospitalizations Conclusion: Response rate was high and similar with both of the procedures and the duration of hospitalization was shorter for C-ECT group with no major complication and no significant increase in adverse effects.

Keywords:

ECT, Schizophrenia, Clozapine,

___

1. Su WR, Chen WL, Chen RH, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional scapular kinematics and shoulder function in patients with short malunion of clavicle fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2016;21(6):739-44. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.005.
2. Ma X, Wang K, Ma J, et al. Operative treatments compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(2):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.04.002.
3. Goudie EB, Clement ND, Murray IR et al. The Influence of Shortening on Clinical Outcome in Healed Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures after Nonoperative Treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(14):1166-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01010.
4. Malik SS, Tahir M, Jordan RW, et al. Is shortening of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures associated with inferior clinical outcomes following nonoperative management? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(8):1626-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.12.017.
5. Akgül T, Zehir S, Özdemir G, et al.[The results of low profile locking anatomical plate application for the treatment of Edinburg type 2 clavicle diaphysis fractures]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20(4):286-90. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.88303.
6. Hillen RJ, Burger BJ, Pöll RG, et al. The effect of experimental shortening of the clavicle on shoulder kinematics. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(8):777–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.003.
7. Veeger HEJ, van der Helm FCT. Shoulder function: The perfect compromise between mobility and stability. J Biomech. 2007;40(10):2119-29. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.016.
8. Nowak J, Holgersson M, Larsson S. Can we predict long-term sequelae after fractures of the clavicle based on initial findings? A prospective study with nine to ten years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(5):479-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.026.
9. Oroko PK, Buchan M, Winkler A, et al. Does shortening matter after clavicular fractures? Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999;58(1):6–8.
10. Lazarides S, Zafiropoulos G. Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: The relevance of shortening and clinical outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.007.
11. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Smith P, et al. Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(9):2509-47. doi: 10.1007/ s11136-013-0362-4.
12. Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;155:7-20.
13. Conboy VB, Morris RW, Kiss J,et al. An evaluation of the constantMurley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78-B:229-32.
14. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020.
15. Virtanen KJ, Remes V, Pajarinen J, et al. Sling compared with plate osteosynthesis for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):1546-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01999.
16. Woltz S, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. Mid-Term Patient Satisfaction and Residual Symptoms After Plate Fixation or Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(11):e435-e439. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001269.
17. Figueiredo GSDL, Tamaoki MJS, Dragone B et al. Correlation of the degree of clavicle shortening after non-surgical treatment of midshaft fractures with upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:151. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0585-3.
18. Malik A, Jazini E, Song X et al. Positional change in displacement of midshaft clavicle fractures: an aid to initial evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(1):e9-e12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000727.
19. Cunningham BP, McLaren A, Richardson M, et al. Clavicular length: The assumption of symmetry. Orthopedics. 2013;36(3):e343-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-24.
20. Omid R, Kidd C, Yi A, et al. Measurement of clavicle fracture shortening using computed tomography and chest radiography. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8(4):367-372. doi: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.367.
21. Stegeman SA, de Witte PB, Boonstra S et al. Posttraumatic midshaft clavicular shortening does not result in relevant functional outcome changes. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(5):545-52. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1040982.
22. Teubner E, Gerstenberger F, Burgert R. [kinematic consideration of the shoulder girdle and its consequences on common surgical methods]. Unfallchirurg. 1991;94(9):471-7.
23. Mullaji AB, Jupiter JB. Low-contact dynamic compression plating of the clavicle. Injury. 1994;25(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90183-x.
24 Özer M, Ataoğlu MB, Çetinkaya M, et al. Do intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic acromioclavicular joint degeneration vary across age groups? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019;30(1):2-9. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2019.62431.